The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Social Norms the Best Predictor of Outcomes Among Heavy-Drinking College Students?
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This research was designed to evaluate the relative contribution of social norms, demographics, drinking motives, and alcohol expectancies in predicting alcohol consumption and related problems among heavy-drinking college students. METHOD: Participants included 818 (57.6% women) first-year undergraduates who reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the previous month. In addition to providing demographic information (gender and fraternity/sorority membership) participants completed Web-based assessments of social norms (perceived descriptive norms regarding typical student drinking, injunctive norms regarding friends' and parents' approval), motives (social, enhancement, coping, and conformity), and expectancies and evaluations of positive and negative alcohol effects. RESULTS: Regression results indicated that descriptive and injunctive norms were among the best predictors of college student drinking. With respect to alcohol problems, results indicated that coping motives accounted for the largest proportion of unique variance. Finally, results revealed that alcohol consumption mediated the relationships between predictors and problems for social norms, whereas coping motives, negative expectancies, and evaluation of negative effects were directly associated with alcohol problems despite having relatively weak or null unique associations with consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study substantiate social norms as being among the best predictors of alcohol consumption in this population and suggest that drinking to cope is a better predictor of problems. The findings are discussed in terms of practical prevention and treatment implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,737
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e560352009-001 · Cited by 6,921
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model.
Cooper, M. L. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.6.2.117 · Cited by 2,398
Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.53.2.189 · Cited by 1,980
Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
Mackinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x9301700202 · Cited by 1,937
Cited by
Acceptance and commitment therapy for problematic internet pornography use: A randomized trial
Crosby, J. M., & Twohig, M. P. (2016) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.001 · Cited by 184
Dotson, K. B., Dunn, M. E., & Bowers, C. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139518 · Cited by 181
Howell, A. N., Leyro, T. M., Hogan, J., Buckner, J. D., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.07.003 · Cited by 163
Descriptive Drinking Norms: For Whom Does Reference Group Matter?
Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., LaBrie, J. W., Atkins, D. C., Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., Kilmer, J. R., Kaysen, D. L., Pedersen, E. R., Montoya, H., et al. (2011) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2011.72.833 · Cited by 97
Self-citationCox, M. J., DiBello, A. M., Meisel, M. K., Ott, M. Q., Kenney, S. R., Clark, M. A., & Barnett, N. P. (2019) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000455 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Neighbors, C., Lee, C. M., Lewis, M. A., Fossos, N., & Larimer, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 556-565
- ISSN
- 1937-1888 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4114
- OpenAlex
- W2134425595
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Social Norms the Best Predictor of Outcomes Among Heavy-Drinking College Students? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556
- The paper
- Neighbors, C., Lee, C. M., Lewis, M. A., Fossos, N., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Are Social Norms the Best Predictor of Outcomes Among Heavy-Drinking College Students? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.