Cited by 102Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Clinical outcomes after estimated versus calculated activity of radioiodine for the treatment of hyperthyroidism: systematic review and meta-analysis

de Rooij, A, Vandenbroucke, J P, Smit, J W A, Stokkel, M P M, Dekkers, O M·2009·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Background: Despite the long experience with radioiodine for hyperthyroidism, controversy remains regarding the optimal method to determine the activity that is required to achieve long-term euthyroidism. Objectives: To compare the effect of estimated versus calculated activity of radioiodine in hyperthyroidism. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the databases Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized and nonrandomized studies, comparing the effect of activity estimation methods with dosimetry for hyperthyroidism. The main outcome measure was the frequency of treatment success, defined as persistent euthyroidism after radioiodine treatment at the end of follow-up in the dose estimated and calculated dosimetry group. Furthermore, we assessed the cure rates of hyperthyroidism. Results: Three randomized and five nonrandomized studies, comparing the effect of estimated versus calculated activity of radioiodine on clinical outcomes for the treatment of hyperthyroidism, were included. The weighted mean relative frequency of successful treatment outcome (euthyroidism) was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.16) for estimated versus calculated activity; the weighted mean relative frequency of cure of hyperthyroidism (eu- or hypothyroidism) was 1.03 (95% CI 0.96–1.10). Subgroup analysis showed a relative frequency of euthyroidism of 1.03 (95% CI 0.84–1.26) for Graves' disease and of 1.05 (95% CI 0.91–1.19) for toxic multinodular goiter. Conclusion: The two main methods used to determine the activity in the treatment of hyperthyroidism with radioiodine, estimated and calculated, resulted in an equally successful treatment outcome. However, the heterogeneity of the included studies is a strong limitation that prevents a definitive conclusion from this meta-analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-09-0286

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Rooij, A., Vandenbroucke, J. P., Smit, J. W. A., Stokkel, M. P. M., & Dekkers, O. M.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Dekkers, O M
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2009-11
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
771-777
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2099188249
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
radioiodine therapy, hyperthyroidism, euthyroidism, Graves' disease, toxic multinodular goiter, treatment success
MeSH terms
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Iodine Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review