Cited by 204Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

A Randomized Comparison of Radioiodine Doses in Graves’ Hyperthyroidism

Leslie, William D., Ward, Linda, Salamon, Elizabeth A., Ludwig, Sora, Rowe, Richard C., Cowden, Elizabeth A.·2003·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The optimal method for determining iodine-131 treatment doses for Graves' hyperthyroidism is unknown, and techniques have varied from a fixed dose to more elaborate calculations based upon gland size, iodine uptake, and iodine turnover. Patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism (n = 88) who had not been previously treated with radioactive iodine were randomized to one of four dose calculation methods: low-fixed, 235 MBq; high-fixed, 350 MBq; low-adjusted, 2.96 MBq (80 micro Ci)/g thyroid adjusted for 24 h radioiodine uptake; and high-adjusted, 4.44 MBq (120 micro Ci)/g thyroid adjusted for 24 h radioiodine uptake. Subjects were followed for mean of 63 months (range, 10-94 months) for the following clinical outcomes: euthyroid without medication, hyperthyroid requiring further radioiodine, and hypothyroid requiring life-long L-T(4). Mean treatment doses were similar in the different outcome groups. We could not demonstrate any advantage to using an adjusted dose method. Survival analysis did not demonstrate any difference in the time to outcome between the fixed and adjusted dose methods. The use of a fixed dose method simplifies the approach to treatment with potential cost savings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2002-020805

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, W. D., Ward, L., Salamon, E. A., Ludwig, S., Rowe, R. C., & Cowden, E. A.
Affiliations
St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Leslie, William D.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2003-03
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
978-983
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2136386868
Cited by
204
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
Graves' hyperthyroidism, radioiodine therapy, iodine-131 dose, dose calculation methods, fixed dose, hypothyroidism, recurrence, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Graves Disease, Humans, Iodine Radioisotopes, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiotherapy Dosage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review