Cited by 35Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Referral bias in female functional hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovary syndrome

Luque-Ramírez, Manuel, Alpañés, Macarena, Sanchón, Raul, Fernández-Durán, Elena, Ortiz-Flores, Andrés E, Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F·2015·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) seeking health care in the United States may be more obese and hyperandrogenic than those present in the general population. We aimed to assess the impact of referral bias on European women with functional androgen excess disorders. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We studied two groups of patients: i) 368 consecutive patients referred to our clinic for the study of functional hyperandrogenism (FH) (referral patients); ii) 57 consecutive premenopausal patients identified by screening during blood donation (unselected patients). We compared the anthropometric data from the groups of patients with those of two control populations: iii) a group of unselected premenopausal healthy female blood donors (unselected controls); and iv) data available from the local general premenopausal female population. RESULTS: Referral patients with FH were more hirsute, had a higher percentage of hyperandrogenemia, and fulfilled PCOS criteria more frequently than unselected patients. The prevalence of obesity in unselected controls was similar to that observed in the general population, whereas referral patients and unselected patients were more frequently obese. The prevalence of obesity was also higher among referral patients compared to unselected patients. CONCLUSION: Referral bias influences the phenotype of patients with FH. Patients studied at the clinical setting may show more severe hyperandrogenic and obese phenotypes than patients from the general population, even though PCOS appears to be associated with weight excess also in the general European population. This fact should be considered when establishing reference values and control populations for clinical and research purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-15-0646

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luque-Ramírez, M., Alpañés, M., Sanchón, R., Fernández-Durán, E., Ortiz-Flores, A. E., & Escobar-Morreale, H. F.
Affiliations
Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
Corresponding author
Escobar-Morreale, Héctor F
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2015-11
Volume
173
Issue
5
Pages
603-610
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2176715857
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
referral bias, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenemia, obesity, hirsutism, blood donor screening, reference population, phenotypic selection, premenopausal women
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hirsutism, Humans, Obesity, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Referral and Consultation, Spain, Hyperandrogenism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review