Cited by 53Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Video consultations as add-on to standard care among patients with type 2 diabetes not responding to standard regimens: a randomized controlled trial

Hansen, Caroline Raun, Perrild, Hans, Koefoed, Birgitte Gade, Zander, Mette·2017·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether video consultations preceded by measurements of blood glucose, weight and blood pressure as add-on to standard care could contribute to achieving and maintaining good diabetes control among patients with poorly regulated type 2 diabetes (T2D). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: 165 patients with T2D were randomized 1:1 to telemedicine intervention as add-on to clinic-based care or control (clinic-based care). The intervention consisted of monthly video conferences with a nurse via a tablet computer and lasted for 32 weeks. Regularly self-monitored measurements of blood sugar, blood pressure and weight were uploaded and visible to patient and nurse. Both groups were followed up six months after the end of the intervention period. Primary endpoint: HbA1c after eight months. Results: Video conferences preceded by uploads of measurements as add-on to clinic-based care led to a significant reduction of HbA1c compared to that in standard care (0.69% vs 0.18%, P = 0.022). However, at six-month follow-up, the inter-group difference in HbA1c-reduction was no longer significant. Non-completers had higher HbA1c levels at baseline and a lower degree of education. Conclusion: Video consultations preceded by uploading relevant measurements can lead to clinically and statistically significant improvements in glycemic control among patients who have not responded to standard regimens. However, continuing effort and attention are essential as the effect does not persist when intervention ends. Furthermore, future studies should focus on differentiation as the most vulnerable patients are at greater risk of non-adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-16-0811

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, C. R., Perrild, H., Koefoed, B. G., & Zander, M.
Affiliations
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • 2Healthcare Centre NørrebroCopenhagen NV, Denmark
Corresponding author
Hansen, Caroline Raun
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2017-06
Volume
176
Issue
6
Pages
727-736
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2602402691
Cited by
53
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, video consultation, telemedicine, glycemic control, HbA1c, uncontrolled diabetes, nurse-led care, self-monitoring of blood glucose, intervention adherence, digital health
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Combined Modality Therapy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Body Mass Index, Videoconferencing, Overweight, Telenursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review