Cited by 9Urban Planning and Landscape DesignLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEnvironmental Changes in China

Exploration on Ecological Restoration Model for the Improvement of Ecosystem Services of Yellow River Floodplains —A Case Study of Zhengzhou Yellow River Floodplain Park Planning and Design

Open access
YU, Kongjian, GONG, Yao·2021·Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Abstract

The Yellow River Basin is one of the greatest and most important ecological barrier and economic belt in China. When the Yellow River Basin is seen as an ecosystem in whole, the floodplains in the lower reaches are critical to the basin’s health and biodiversity. However, due to the extreme complexity of the natural environment of the floodplains, current flood control policies, long-term agricultural activities, and extensive rural construction and production dikes, the river ecosystem has suffered from considerable damage and a serious decline of ecosystem services. In the planning and design project of the Zhengzhou Yellow River Floodplain Park, the characteristics of the lower, intermediate, and higher floodplains have been carefully identified, site-specific ecological restoration measures for each floodplain type were implemented, highlighting the authenticity and natural qualities and improving the overall ecosystem services. In addition, a slow traffic system and innovative industries along the Yellow River are introduced to enable high-quality cultural perception and recreational experience of the improved ecosystem services, promote green production and lifestyle. These measures help make the Yellow River a river that truly benefit the locals. In the context of ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River, as a national agenda, the ecological restoration planning strategies proposed in this article provides a reference for the development of ecological management and green economy in other sections of the lower reaches of the Yellow River.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15302/j-laf-1-040025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YU, K., & GONG, Y.
Affiliations
  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences (US)
  • Utah Department of Transportation (US)
Venue
Landscape Architecture Frontiers
Published
2021
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
86
ISSN
  • 2095-5405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2096-336X
OpenAlex
W4232042281
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Landscape Architecture Frontiers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Environmental Changes in China
Keywords
Yellow River floodplain, ecological restoration, ecosystem services, green economy, river ecosystem degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review