Cited by 7Advanced Authentication Protocols SecurityWireless Body Area NetworksSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks

Protection of data confidentiality and patient privacy in medical sensor networks

Sankar, R., Le, X.H., Lee, S., Wang, D.·2013·Implantable Sensor Systems for Medical Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1533/9780857096289.2.279

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sankar, R., Le, X. H., Lee, S., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Venue
Implantable Sensor Systems for Medical Applications
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2013
Pages
279-298
OpenAlex
W101529875
Cited by
7
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
medical sensor networks, data confidentiality, patient privacy, implantable sensors, wearable sensors, mutual authentication, lightweight authentication protocol, malicious node detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review