Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autophosphorylation Within the Atg1 Activation Loop Is Required for Both Kinase Activity and the Induction of Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeh, Yuh-Ying, Wrasman, Kristie, Herman, Paul K·2010·Genetics

Abstract

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved degradative pathway that has been implicated in a number of physiological events important for human health. This process was originally identified as a response to nutrient deprivation and is thought to serve in a recycling capacity during periods of nutritional stress. Autophagy activity appears to be highly regulated and multiple signaling pathways are known to target a complex of proteins that contains the Atg1 protein kinase. The data here extend these observations and identify a particular phosphorylation event on Atg1 as a potential control point within the autophagy pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This phosphorylation occurs at a threonine residue, T226, within the Atg1 activation loop that is conserved in all Atg1 orthologs. Replacing this threonine with a nonphosphorylatable residue resulted in a loss of Atg1 protein kinase activity and a failure to induce autophagy. This phosphorylation required the presence of a functional Atg1 kinase domain and two known regulators of Atg1 activity, Atg13 and Atg17. Interestingly, the levels of this modification were found to increase dramatically upon exposure to conditions that induce autophagy. In addition, T226 phosphorylation was associated with an autophosphorylated form of Atg1 that was found specifically in cells undergoing the autophagy process. In all, these data suggest that autophosphorylation within the Atg1 activation loop may represent a point of regulatory control for this degradative process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.110.116566

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 477, 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0413 · DOI
  2. 2001, Chem. Rev., 101, 2271, 10.1021/cr000230w · DOI
  3. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 20663, 10.1074/jbc.M400272200 · DOI
  4. 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 13933, 10.1073/pnas.0501046102 · DOI
  5. 2009, Mol. Cell. Biol., 29, 157, 10.1128/MCB.01082-08 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2001, Genetics, 157, 17, 10.1093/genetics/157.1.17 · DOI
  7. 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 2004, 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1250 · DOI
  8. 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 668, 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0826 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2006, Genetics, 173, 1909, 10.1534/genetics.106.059238 · DOI
  10. 2009, Genetics, 182, 529, 10.1534/genetics.109.102178 · DOI
  11. 1997, Gene, 192, 207, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00031-0 · DOI
  12. 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 12297, 10.1074/jbc.M900573200 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2002, Nature, 418, 387, 10.1038/nature00935 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1995, FASEB J., 9, 576, 10.1096/fasebj.9.8.7768349 · DOI
  15. 1988, Science, 241, 42, 10.1126/science.3291115 · DOI
  16. 2008, J. Cell Biol., 181, 497, 10.1083/jcb.200712064 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2002, Cell, 109, 275, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00741-9 · DOI
  18. 2006, IUBMB Life, 58, 312, 10.1080/15216540600746393 · DOI
  19. 1996, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6, 762, 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80005-4 · DOI
  20. 1996, Cell, 85, 149, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81092-2 · DOI
  21. 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 1992, 10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1249 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 2544, 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0669 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2000, J. Cell Biol., 150, 1507, 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2010, Mol. Cell. Biol., 30, 1049, 10.1128/MCB.01344-09 · DOI
  25. 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 2039, 10.1091/mbc.e07-10-1048 · DOI
  26. 2002, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 14, 468, 10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00343-5 · DOI
  27. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 152, 51, 10.1083/jcb.152.1.51 · DOI
  28. 1989, EMBO J., 8, 2241, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08348.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 1992, J. Cell Biol., 119, 287, 10.1083/jcb.119.2.287 · DOI
  30. 1991, Science, 253, 407, 10.1126/science.1862342 · DOI
  31. 2005, Cell, 120, 159
  32. 2008, Cell, 132, 27, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2005, Cell, 121, 925, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.034 · DOI
  34. 2006, Mol. Cell, 24, 627, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.009 · DOI
  35. 1997, Gene, 192, 245, 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00084-X · DOI
  36. 2007, Autophagy, 3, 106, 10.4161/auto.3595 · DOI
  37. 2009, Autophagy, 5, 649, 10.4161/auto.5.5.8249 · DOI
  38. 2008, Methods Enzymol., 451, 33, 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03203-5 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 3963, 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3963 · DOI
  40. 1995, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 210, 126, 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1636 · DOI
  41. 2004, Mol. Cell, 15, 661, 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.024 · DOI
  42. 2007, Trends Biochem. Sci., 32, 351, 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.06.004 · DOI
  43. 2006, J. Mol. Biol., 361, 312, 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.06.017 · DOI
  44. 2007, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 6, 304, 10.1038/nrd2272 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 12304, 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12304 · DOI
  46. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 29889, 10.1074/jbc.M404399200 · DOI
  47. 2006, Autophagy, 2, 146, 10.4161/auto.2.2.2485 · DOI
  48. 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 17049, 10.1073/pnas.0903316106 · DOI
  49. 2007, FEBS Lett., 581, 2156, 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.096 · DOI
  50. 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5971, 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971 · DOI
  51. 1993, FEBS Lett., 333, 169, 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80398-E · DOI
  52. 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 5742, 10.1128/MCB.21.17.5742-5752.2001 · DOI
  53. 2007, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 1102, 10.1038/ncb1007-1102 · DOI
  54. 1981, J. Biol. Chem., 256, 10837, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68519-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yeh, Y.-Y., Wrasman, K., & Herman, P. K.
Affiliations
Department of Molecular Genetics , The Ohio State University, Columbus Ohio 43210 and
Venue
Genetics
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
185
Issue
3
Pages
871-882
ISSN
1943-2631
Cited by
94
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review