The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate Prediction of Genetic Values for Complex Traits by Whole-Genome Resequencing
Open accessAbstract
Whole-genome resequencing technology has improved rapidly during recent years and is expected to improve further such that the sequencing of an entire human genome sequence for $1000 is within reach. Our main aim here is to use whole-genome sequence data for the prediction of genetic values of individuals for complex traits and to explore the accuracy of such predictions. This is relevant for the fields of plant and animal breeding and, in human genetics, for the prediction of an individual's risk for complex diseases. Here, population history and genomic architectures were simulated under the Wright–Fisher population and infinite-sites mutation model, and prediction of genetic value was by the genomic selection approach, where a Bayesian nonlinear model was used to predict the effects of individual SNPs. The Bayesian model assumed a priori that only few SNPs are causative, i.e., have an effect different from zero. When using whole-genome sequence data, accuracies of prediction of genetic value were >40% increased relative to the use of dense ∼30K SNP chips. At equal high density, the inclusion of the causative mutations yielded an extra increase of accuracy of 2.5–3.7%. Predictions of genetic value remained accurate even when the training and evaluation data were 10 generations apart. Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of SNP effects does not take full advantage of the genome sequence data, and nonlinear predictions, such as the Bayesian method used here, are needed to achieve maximum accuracy. On the basis of theoretical work, the results could be extended to more realistic genome and population sizes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 2008, Nat. Genet., 40, 955, 10.1038/ng.175 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, PLoS ONE, 3, e3395, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Mol. Ecol., 13, 2505, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02254.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Genetica, 136, 245, 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Nat. Rev. Genet., 10, 381, 10.1038/nrg2575 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Genetics, 177, 2389, 10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Genet. Sel. Evol., 33, 209, 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 · Paper page
- 2007, Genetics., 177, 1725, 10.1534/genetics.106.069088 · DOI
- 2002, Bioinformatics, 18, 337, 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.337 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Hum. Mol. Genet., 17, R166, 10.1093/hmg/ddn250 · DOI · Paper page
- 1969, Genetics, 61, 893, 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893 · DOI · Paper page
- 1982, J. Appl. Probab., 19A, 27
- 2008, Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet., 9, 387, 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Genet. Sel. Evol., 41, 35, 10.1186/1297-9686-41-35 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Genetics, 157, 1819, 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Growth. Mamm. Genome, 15, 83, 10.1007/s00335-003-2312-x · DOI
- 2006, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 78, 629, 10.1086/502802 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 1135, 10.1038/nbt1486 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, J. Dairy Sci., 88, 1865, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72861-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, J. Mol. Diagn., 10, 484, 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080027 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, J. Dairy Sci., 92, 16, 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Kell, D. B. (2011) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcr175 · Cited by 439
Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection
Voss-Fels, K. P., Cooper, M., & Hayes, B. J. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3270-8 · Cited by 381
The FAANG Consortium, Andersson, L., Archibald, A. L., Bottema, C. D., Brauning, R., Burgess, S. C., Burt, D. W., Casas, E., Cheng, H. H., Clarke, L., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0622-4 · Cited by 357
Accelerating Improvement of Livestock with Genomic Selection
Meuwissen, T., Hayes, B., & Goddard, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103705 · Cited by 339
Self-citationIntegrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation
Technow, F., Messina, C. D., Totir, L. R., & Cooper, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130855 · Cited by 265
“[4], Kärkkäinen 5 and Sillanpää [5], Technow and Melchinger [6]), increasing the marker density used 6 (Meuwissen and Goddard [7], Erbe et al.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Meuwissen, T., & Goddard, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 623-631
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2154670965
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate Prediction of Genetic Values for Complex Traits by Whole-Genome Resequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1534/genetics.110.116590
- The paper
- Meuwissen, T., & Goddard, M. (2010). Accurate Prediction of Genetic Values for Complex Traits by Whole-Genome Resequencing. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.116590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.