The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Views of Participatory Design
Open accessAbstract
Professor Henry Sanoff is an internationally respected scholar who has been studying, publishing, and working with participatory design for more than forty years.His books and articles appear in several languages, and he has taught and served as a consultant all over the world.This article discusses the historical background of participatory design, its role in a democracy and in building community, and the different types of participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Traditionally, supporting mutual understanding between different stakeholders has been one of the key missions of participatory processes (Sanoff, 2011).”
From Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design (2023) · cites this paper as Sanoff, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Tocqueville, A., Mansfield, H. C., & Winthrop, D. (2000) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118011690.ch12 · Cited by 6,287
(2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412953948.n339 · Cited by 3,237
Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology
Rappaport, J. (1987) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00919275 · Cited by 2,679
Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets
Kretzman, J. P., & McKnight, J. (1993) · Cited by 2,146
Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge
Chung, K. H., & Ouchi, W. G. (1982) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257316 · Cited by 1,696
Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5341 · Cited by 1,544
ADVOCACY AND PLURALISM IN PLANNING
Davidoff, P. (1965) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366508978187 · Cited by 1,471
Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning
Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412205286160 · Cited by 1,354
Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge
Ouchi, W. G. (1981) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(81)90031-8 · Cited by 1,216
(2005) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 1,064
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Casrson, L. 2003. Building Sustainable Democracies. Paper presented at "Now We Are People Conference", University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
- Rosener, J. 1978. Matching Method to Purpose: The Challenges of Planning Citizen Participation Activities. In S. Langton (ed.) Citizen Participation in America. New York: Lexington Books, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–120 of 120
DRS2016: Future-Focused Thinking
Lloyd, P. A., & Bohemia, E. (2016) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2016.v4
(2019) · Advances in civil and industrial engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8958-7.ch007
Putting Participation into Practice: Strategies for Evolving Architecture
Dubyoski, J. (2020) · Schools of Thought Conference · doi:10.15763/11244/335072
Бондаренко, К. А. (2022) · Humanities science current issues · doi:10.24919/2308-4863/49-1-9
TERLEMEZ, A. K., & Hacıhasanoğlu, O. (2015) · International Journal of Architecture and Design · doi:10.17932/iau.arch.2015.017/arch_v08i1001
A collaboration process to produce a natural playscape
Ryan, K., Bruya, L. D., Shumate, B. T., Woytovech, C. J., Woytovech, A., Martensen, B., Malkusak, A., & Sievers, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Kinesiology & Wellness · doi:10.56980/jkw.v1i1.37
Cui, Y., Marques, B., & Gjerde, M. (2022) · ISOCARP World Planning Congress · doi:10.47472/snzed2q3
Katılımcı tasarımda kamusal alan dinamikleri: Lucien Kroll
Bengü, D. (2024) · Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.56723/dyad.1422826
Nunes, V. D. G. A., & Zurlo, F. (2024) · Estudos em Design · doi:10.35522/eed.v32i2.1976
A Comprehensive Guide to Participatory Methods in Urban Planning
Amimi, M. O., Guidat, C., & Bary, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice/itmc61926.2024.10794384
Partisipasi Masyarakat Borgo-Babontehu dalam pembangunan kembali pesisir Manado Utara
Howan, A. C. (2024) · KRITIS · doi:10.24246/kritis.v33i2p126-149
Liss, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93233-5_1
Metodologías participativas para la transformación de espacios públicos: el barrio de las Palmeras
Martinez, F. J., García, E. P., & Delgado-Serrano, M. M. (2025) · Cuadernos de Vivienda y Urbanismo · doi:10.11144/javeriana.cvu18.mpte · Cited by 1
Enhancing universal design through co-design: perceptions of practice, process and outcomes
Watchorn, V., Tucker, R., Hitch, D., & Frawley, P. (2026) · International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR · doi:10.1108/arch-08-2025-0340
Lyng, H. B., Haraldseid-Driftland, C., Lungu, D. A., Viksveen, P., Akerjordet, K., Glette, M. K., Ree, E., Guise, V., Haver, A., Bergerød, I. J., et al. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/73701
A Methodology for Human-Centred Architectural Design
Attaianese, E., & Sarmento, T. S. (2026) · Springer series in design and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21834-6_2
Framework for user-centred design and pre-occupancy design evaluation of higher education buildings
Nazeer, F. S., Kamardeen, I., & Hasan, A. (2026) · Construction Innovation · doi:10.1108/ci-12-2025-0554
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanoff, H.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sanoff, Henry
- ORCID
- Sanoff, Henry
- Venue
- Focus
- Publisher
- Robert E. Kennedy Library, Cal Poly
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1549-3776 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096124464
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Focus The Journal of Planning Practice and Education (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
- Keywords
- participatory design, democracy, community building, types of participation, community planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
