Cited by 113Pediatric health and respiratory diseasesInfection Control in HealthcareViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Effect of infection control measures on the frequency of diarrheal episodes in child care: a randomized, controlled trial

Roberts, Leslee, Jorm, Louisa, PhD, BVSc, MSc(Epid),, Patel, Mahomed, Smith, Wayne, Douglas, Robert M., McGilchrist, Charles·2000·PEDIATRICS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diarrheal infections are common in children who attend child care, and preventing transmission of disease in this setting depends on actions by child care staff. We set out to discover whether transmission of gastrointestinal infections in child care could be reduced by improved infection control procedures. METHODS: We performed a cluster randomized, controlled trial of an infection control intervention conducted in child care centers for 1 city in Australia. The intervention was training of child care staff about transmission of infection and handwashing and focused on both staff and child behavior. Implementation of the intervention was recorded by an observer. Illness was measured by parent report in telephone interviews every 2 weeks. RESULTS: There were 311 child-years of surveillance for diarrheal episodes. The rate of episodes of diarrhea was 1.9 per child-year in intervention centers and 2.7 per child-year in control centers. Multivariable analysis showed that diarrheal episodes were significantly reduced in intervention center children by 50%. However, the impact of the intervention was confined to children over 24 months of age. For those centers in which children's compliance with handwashing was high, diarrheal episodes were reduced by 66%. CONCLUSIONS: This trial supports education about infection control, for staff and children in child care, as a means of reducing transmission of diarrhea. Reduction in episodes of diarrhea in children in child care was limited to children over 24 months of age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.105.4.743

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, L., Jorm, L., PhD, B., Patel, M., Smith, W., Douglas, R. M., & McGilchrist, C.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, New South Wales Health Department, Australia.
Venue
PEDIATRICS
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
743-746
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1966040440
Cited by
113
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
infection control, diarrhea, daycare centers, hand washing, hand hygiene compliance, childhood diseases
MeSH terms
Child Day Care Centers, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Infantile, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant, Prospective Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Australian Capital Territory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review