Cited by 102Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNeonatal skin health care

Maternal and birth attendant hand washing and neonatal mortality in southern Nepal

Open access
Rhee, Victor, Mullany, Luke C., Khatry, Subarna K., Katz, Joanne, LeClerq, Steven C., Darmstadt, Gary L., Tielsch, James M.·2008·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 95% of neonatal deaths occur in developing countries, approximately 50% at home. Few data are available on the impact of hand-washing practices by birth attendants or caretakers on neonatal mortality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between birth attendant and maternal hand-washing practices and neonatal mortality in rural Nepal. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Sarlahi District in rural southern Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Newborn infants were originally enrolled in a community-based trial assessing the effect of skin and/or umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in southern Nepal. A total of 23,662 newborns were enrolled and observed through 28 days of life. MAIN EXPOSURES: Questionnaires were administered to mothers on days 1 and 14 after delivery to identify care practices and risk factors for mortality and infection. Three hand-washing categories were defined: (1) birth attendant hand washing with soap and water before assisting with delivery, (2) maternal hand washing with soap and water or antiseptic before handling the baby, and (3) combined birth attendant and maternal hand washing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality within the neonatal period. RESULTS: Birth attendant hand washing was related to a statistically significant lower mortality rate among neonates (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.99), as was maternal hand washing (adjusted RR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82). There was a 41% lower mortality rate among neonates exposed to both hand-washing practices (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Birth attendant and maternal hand washing with soap and water were associated with significantly lower rates of neonatal mortality. Measures to improve or promote birth attendant and maternal hand washing could improve neonatal survival rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.162.7.603

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Handwashing reduces neonatal mortality, trachoma, and parasitic worm infections.

    “Handwashing also reduces neonatal mortality,15 trachoma,16 and parasitic worm infections.17”

    From Hygiene: new hopes, new horizons (2011) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results and Discussion report significantly lower neonatal mortality associated with maternal and birth-attendant handwashing in southern Nepal. The source does not establish that handwashing caused the reduction; the Discussion acknowledges possible residual confounding. Trachoma and parasitic worm infections have separate citations in the citing sentence and are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]WHO Care of the Umbilical Cord: A Review of the Evidence 1998 World Health Organization Geneva

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhee, V., Mullany, L. C., Khatry, S. K., Katz, J., LeClerq, S. C., Darmstadt, G. L., & Tielsch, J. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2008-07-07
Volume
162
Issue
7
Pages
603
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166016624
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD038753, HD 38753, HD 44004, R01HD044004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Neonatal skin health care
Keywords
hand washing, birth attendants, neonatal mortality, neonatal care practices, soap and water, rural Nepal, Sarlahi District, neonatal infection prevention
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Antisepsis, Chlorhexidine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Male, Midwifery, Mothers, Nepal, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Skin, Umbilicus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review