Cited by 55Adolescent Health and BehaviorsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Contribution of Level of Cognitive Complexity and Pubertal Timing to Behavioral Risk in Young Adolescents

Orr, Donald P., Ingersoll, Gary M.·1995·Pediatrics

Abstract

Purpose To determine the unique contributions of cognitive complexity and pubertal timing to participation in behavioral risk (substance use, sexual activity, school and legal problems) among young adolescents. Design Cross-sectional with cohort replication. Methods Two cohorts of middle school students in grades eight and nine in a midwestern school district completed a self-report questionnaire in 1987 and 1989. Measures of behavioral and emotional risk, cognitive complexity and pubertal timing relative to peers were included. Results Complete data were available for 817 and 796 students in each cohort year. Gender, race, level of cognitive complexity and pubertal timing each contributed significantly to the variance in behavioral risk independent of chronological age (P Implications Pediatricians should consider adolescents at lower levels of cognitive complexity (concrete thinking) and those who begin puberty earlier at greater risk for participation in health risk behaviors. Preventive health counseling tailored to the needs of this group may be most beneficial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.95.4.528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent brain development may explain characteristic adolescent traits such as mood swings, impulsivity, risk taking, and peer-directed social interactions.

    “Thereby, brain development may be responsible for characteristic adolescent traits—uncontrollable mood swings, impulsivity, risk taking, and peer-directed social interactions (Orr and Ingersoll 1995; Spear 2000; Galvan et al. 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orr, D. P., & Ingersoll, G. M.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
1995-04-01
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
528-533
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W1952294136
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (MCJ 189596)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
cognitive complexity, pubertal timing, adolescent risk behavior, substance use, adolescent sexual activity, school problems, legal issues, concrete thinking, gender differences, racial differences, peer comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Puberty, Risk-Taking, Thinking, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review