Cited by 20Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Current challenges in adopting machine learning to critical care and emergency medicine

Open access
Kang, Cyra-Yoonsun, Yoon, Joo Heung·2023·Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Over the past decades, the field of machine learning (ML) has made great strides in medicine. Despite the number of ML-inspired publications in the clinical arena, the results and implications are not readily accepted at the bedside. Although ML is very powerful in deciphering hidden patterns in complex critical care and emergency medicine data, various factors including data, feature generation, model design, performance assessment, and limited implementation could affect the utility of the research. In this short review, a series of current challenges of adopting ML models to clinical research will be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15441/ceem.23.041

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reasons for the AI chasm include lack of necessary expertise, lack of funding, underappreciation of clinical research, disregard for early stages, and poor reporting and evaluations.

    “Reasons proposed for this so-called AI chasm [18] are lack of necessary expertise needed for translating a tool into practice, lack of funding available for translation, underappreciation of clinical research as a translation mechanism, disregard for the potential value of the early stages of clinical evaluation and the analysis of human factors [19], and poor reporting and evaluations [2, 8, 20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Davis J Goadrich M The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves Cohen WW Moore A Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning 2006 Jun 25-29 Pittsburgh, PA, USA Association for Computing Machinery 2006 233 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, C.-Y., & Yoon, J. H.
Affiliations
  • John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Yoon, Joo Heung
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Published
2023-05-15
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
132-137
ISSN
2383-4625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376642915
Cited by
20
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
US National National Institutes of Health (K23GM138984)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
machine learning adoption, intensive care, emergency medicine, clinical implementation, clinical data quality, feature construction, model design, performance evaluation, clinical translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review