Cited by 4Hallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Some consideration about auditory verbal hallucinations in the clinical field

Open access
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, Iudici, Antonio, Turchi, Gianpiero, Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy, Faccio, Elena, Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy·2020·Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15557/pipk.2020.0010

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It can be difficult to identify and recruit nonclinical voice-hearers because it may be uneasy to share their own experience, probably fearing encountering stigma or to be isolated by other people.

    “Furthermore, it can be difficult to identify and recruit nonclinical voice-hearers, because it may be uneasy to share their own experience, probably fearing encountering stigma [18, 24] or to be isolated by other people [25–27].”

    From The “common” experience of voice-hearing and its relationship with shame and guilt: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The main text (pp. 77–79) says that some people who hear voices avoid services because they fear being seen as “deranged or insane,” and it discusses stigma associated with schizophrenia. It does not say that nonclinical voice-hearers are reluctant to share their experiences or that this makes them difficult to identify and recruit. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Department of Philosophy, S., Iudici, A., Turchi, G., Department of Philosophy, S., Faccio, E., & Department of Philosophy, S.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Iudici, Antonio
Venue
Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
77-79
ISSN
  • 1644-6313 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-0645
OpenAlex
W3033965277
Cited by
4
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, clinical evaluation, psychosis, schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review