Cited by 247Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong

Open access
Wang, Pengcheng, Zhao, Meng, Wang, Xingchao, Xie, Xiaochun, Wang, Yuhui, Lei, Li·2017·Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Abstract

Background and aims: Adolescent smartphone addiction has received increased attention in recent years, and peer relationship has been found to be a protective factor in adolescent smartphone. However, little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this relation. The aim of this study was to investigate (a) the mediating role of self-esteem in the association between student–student relationship and smartphone addiction, and (b) the moderating role of the need to belong in the indirect relationship between student–student relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction. Methods: This model was examined with 768 Chinese adolescents (mean age = 16.81 years, SD = 0.73); the participants completed measurements regarding student–student relationship, self-esteem, the need to belong, and smartphone addiction. Results: The correlation analyses indicated that student–student relationship was significantly negatively associated with adolescent smartphone addiction, and the need to belong was significantly positively associated with adolescent smartphone addiction. Mediation analyses revealed that self-esteem partially mediated the link between student-student relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction. Moderated mediation further indicated that the mediated path was weaker for adolescents with lower levels of the need to belong. Discussion and conclusion: High self-esteem could be a protective factor against smartphone addiction for adolescents with a strong need to belong as these students appeared to be at elevated risk of developing smartphone addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2006.6.2017.079

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphone users frequently and unconsciously check information on their devices due to FoMO, leading to information overload behaviors.

    “It has been found that smartphone users frequently and unconsciously check the information on their devices due to the influence of FoMO, leading to information overload behaviors (Wang et al., 2017).”

    From Fear of missing out and psychological well-being: Examining the dual pathways of problematic social media use and digital burnout (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2017

    The Introduction and the subsection on the need to belong discuss adolescent smartphone addiction and social motivation, but neither addresses FoMO, unconscious information checking, or information overload. Searches for those terms and related checking behavior found no passage supporting the attributed causal chain; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jiang G. R. (2002). Research on classroom social ecology environment. Wuhan, China: Central China Normal University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Zhao, M., Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., & Lei, L.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Beijing Municipal Administration of Education and Correction, Beijing, China
  • Northeast Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lei, Li
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2017-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
708-717
ISSN
  • 2062-5871 (ISSN-L)
  • 2063-5303
OpenAlex
W2780164011
Cited by
247
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8
FWCI
44.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
peer relationships, self-esteem, need to belong, mediation, moderated mediation, protective factors, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, China, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Self Concept, Psychological Distance, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review