Cited by 990Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorStudent Stress and Coping

The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students

Lepp, Andrew, Barkley, Jacob E., Karpinski, Aryn C.·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lepp, Andrew
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
31
Pages
343-350
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998146685
Cited by
990
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 14
FWCI
116.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
mobile phone use, text messaging, academic performance, anxiety, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, university students, GPA, mental health, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review