Cited by 68Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxious attachment and excessive acquisition: The mediating roles of anthropomorphism and distress intolerance

Open access
Norberg, Melissa M., Crone, Cassandra, Kwok, Cathy, Grisham, Jessica R.·2018·Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Abstract

Background and aims: Most individuals with hoarding disorder (HD) are prone to excessively acquiring new possessions. Understanding the factors that contribute to this collecting behavior will allow us to develop better treatment approaches for HD. The aim of this study was to test our assumption that an anxious attachment style is associated with a tendency to anthropomorphize comforting objects and an inability to tolerate distress, which in turn leads to excessive acquisition. Methods: A total of 361 participants with subclinical to clinical acquisition problems (77.8% female) completed a series of self-report measures. Results: As expected, greater anxious attachment was related to greater distress intolerance and stronger tendencies to anthropomorphize inanimate objects. In turn, greater distress intolerance and anthropomorphism were related to more excessive buying and greater acquisition of free items. Examination of the pathways and indirect effects showed support for double mediation rather than serial mediation, as distress intolerance did not predict anthropomorphism. Discussion and conclusion: These novel findings, if replicated, suggest that adding treatment modules that target improving distress tolerance and reducing anthropomorphism to standard treatment for HD may lead to further reductions in excessive acquiring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2006.7.2018.08

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Fromm E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics (Vol. 57). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  3. Hayes S. C. Strosahl K. D. Wilson K. G. (2016). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Keefer L. A. (2016). Is there anybody out there?: Trait anthropomorphism predicts the psychological benefits of a favorite belonging. Journal of Individual Differences, 37(4), 231– 238. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000210 · DOI
  5. Linehan M. M. (2014). DBT® skills training manual (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  6. Timpano K. Exner C. Glaesmer H. Rief W. Keshaviah A. Brähler E. Wilhelm S. (2011). The epidemiology of the proposed DSM-5 hoarding disorder: Exploration of the acquisition specifier, associated features, and distress. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72(6), 780– 786. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06380 21733479 · DOI
  7. Waytz A. Cacioppo J. Epley N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219– 232. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336 24839457 PMC4021380 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Weissman M. M. Markowitz J. C. Klerman G. L. (2017). The guide to interpersonal psychotherapy (updated and expanded Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norberg, M. M., Crone, C., Kwok, C., & Grisham, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Norberg, Melissa M.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2018-02-14
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
171-180
ISSN
  • 2062-5871 (ISSN-L)
  • 2063-5303
OpenAlex
W2786661541
Cited by
68
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hoarding disorder, attachment anxiety, anthropomorphism, distress intolerance, inanimate objects, dual mediation, attachment styles, treatment goals
MeSH terms
Hoarding Disorder, Anxiety, Compulsive Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Psychological Tests, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence, Self Report, Hoarding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review