The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication
Abstract
Until recently no linguistic research had been carried out on Australian Sign Language (Auslan) with regard to its use in healthcare settings, although anecdotal information suggests that the health lexicon of Auslan is strikingly under-developed. This paper describes a study that examined health terminology from the perspective of deaf people. Based on a thematic analysis of focus group data, the paper outlines strategies that deaf Australians report using when communicating about health concepts that do not have established signs in Auslan. Participants described a variety of communicative strategies – including the use of fingerspelling, depiction and explanations – that they employ in order to circumnavigate lexical gaps when talking about health. The study provides a crucial starting point for a discussion of the implications of lexical gaps in Auslan and highlights issues of particular relevance for interpreters who take responsibility for brokering health terms and mediating health communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939
Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction
Kleinsasser, R. C., & Silverman, D. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329190 · Cited by 6,866
Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature
Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m · Cited by 2,430
Sign Language and Linguistic Universals
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139163910 · Cited by 1,415
Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language
Liddell, S. K. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615054 · Cited by 1,387
Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication
Angelelli, C. V. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511486616 · Cited by 905
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2461 · Cited by 762
Toward Understanding Practices of Medical Interpreting: Interpreters' Involvement in History Taking
BOLDEN, G. B. (2000) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445600002004001 · Cited by 585
Hale, S. B. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230593442 · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Major, G., Napier, J., Ferrara, L., & Johnston, T.
- Venue
- Communication & Medicine
- Published
- 2013-02-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-47
- ISSN
- 1612-1783 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-3625
- OpenAlex
- W1992910934
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 119.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1558/cam.v9i1.37
- The paper
- Major, G., Napier, J., Ferrara, L., & Johnston, T. (2013). Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication. Communication & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v9i1.37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.