Cited by 355Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use

Wood, David, Schmitt, Norbert·2006·TESOL Quarterly

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40264535

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, D., & Schmitt, N.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wood, David
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
457
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154391246
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
formulaic language, language acquisition, language processing, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review