Cited by 4Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Weathering the Storm: Supernatural Belief and Cooperation in an Insecure World

Open access
McNamara, Rita Anne·2020·Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Religious and supernatural beliefs may facilitate social life by promoting and sustaining cooperation, but the specific cooperation problems each society faces may lead to unique belief systems adapted to local socioecological conditions. As societies mix and belief systems spread, local and introduced belief systems may present conflicting solutions to the same social problem. How do we choose among these different solutions? The present study recruits participation from villagers living on Yasawa Island, Fiji (n = 179) who espouse both Christian and Traditional beliefs that promote different expectations about local and distant others. This study focuses on the relationships among existential/resource insecurity and supernatural beliefs across these belief systems using an experimental priming procedure and a dictator game to allocate food resources. Though reminders of insecurity had no impact on allocations, the effects of being reminded of Christian or Traditional belief depended on (was moderated by) how worried participants were about resource availability and beliefs about the Christian God’s tendency toward punishment or forgiveness. Analyses of interview data suggest Christian and Traditional imagery may evoke different conceptions of gods as either supportive (Christian) or authoritarian (Traditional). Results highlight belief content as key for sustaining different social support networks and traditional belief/ knowledge systems as a source of community resilience against threats like natural disasters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1558/jsrnc.38538

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptive dynamics of individual socio-ecological settings create locally specific forms of religious belief systems that simultaneously support social life within local conditions and with interaction across more diverse groups.

    “This then allows for the adaptive dynamics of individual socio-ecological settings to create locally specific forms of religious belief systems that simultaneously support social life within local conditions and with interaction across more diverse groups (Purzycki and McNamara 2016; McNamara 2020; McNamara et al. 2021; McNamara and Henrich 2017a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamara, R. A.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Rita Anne
Venue
Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture
Published
2020-08-05
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
12-44
ISSN
  • 1749-4907 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4915
OpenAlex
W3047683631
Cited by
4
References
84
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
supernatural beliefs, Christian faith, traditional beliefs, religious pluralism, resource insecurity, existential insecurity, dictator game, social support networks, community resilience, natural disasters, Fiji

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review