CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impartial Institutions, Pathogen Stress and the Expanding Social Network

Hruschka, Daniel, Efferson, Charles, Jiang, Ting, Falletta-Cowden, Ashlan, Sigurdsson, Sveinn, McNamara, Rita, Sands, Madeline, Munira, Shirajum, Slingerland, Edward, Henrich, Joseph·2014·Human Nature
DOI 10.1007/s12110-014-9217-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Anthropologists have documented substantial cross-society variation in people's willingness to treat strangers with impartial, universal norms versus favoring members of their local community. Researchers have proposed several adaptive accounts for these differences. One variant of the pathogen stress hypothesis predicts that people will be more likely to favor local in-group members when they are under greater infectious disease threat. The material security hypothesis instead proposes that institutions that permit people to meet their basic needs through impartial interactions with strangers reinforce a tendency toward impartiality, whereas people lacking such institutions must rely on local community members to meet their basic needs. Some studies have examined these hypotheses using self-reported preferences, but not with behavioral measures. We conducted behavioral experiments in eight diverse societies that measure individuals' willingness to favor in-group members by ignoring an impartial rule. Consistent with the material security hypothesis, members of societies enjoying better-quality government services and food security show a stronger preference for following an impartial rule over investing in their local in-group. Our data show no support for the pathogen stress hypothesis as applied to favoring in-groups and instead suggest that favoring in-group members more closely reflects a general adaptive fit with social institutions that have arisen in each society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-014-9217-0

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cues of belief and belonging from adoption of religious belief systems ride on the signalling systems utilised in ritual displays to convey information about a potential interaction partner without the benefit of direct connection through kinship or interpersonal contact and reputation.

    “The cues of belief and belonging from adoption of these religious belief systems ride on the signalling systems utilised in ritual displays to convey information about a potential interaction partner without the benefit of direct connection through kinship or interpersonal contact and reputation (McNamara and Henrich 2017a; Hruschka et al. 2014).”

    From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as Hruschka et al. 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hruschka, D., Efferson, C., Jiang, T., Falletta-Cowden, A., Sigurdsson, S., McNamara, R., Sands, M., Munira, S., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Field Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Hruschka, Daniel
ORCID
Venue
Human Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-10-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
567-579
ISSN
  • 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4776
DOI
10.1007/s12110-014-9217-0
OpenAlex
W1967450864
Cited by
123
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
32.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Human Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
impartiality, in-group favoritism, social institutions, government quality, food security, social networks, cross-cultural variation
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Government, Humans, Residence Characteristics, Social Support, Stress, Physiological, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review