Cited by 1,304Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting

Open access
Bateson, Melissa, Nettle, Daniel, Roberts, Gilbert·2006·Biology Letters

Abstract

We examined the effect of an image of a pair of eyes on contributions to an honesty box used to collect money for drinks in a university coffee room. People paid nearly three times as much for their drinks when eyes were displayed rather than a control image. This finding provides the first evidence from a naturalistic setting of the importance of cues of being watched, and hence reputational concerns, on human cooperative behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G.
Affiliations
  • Evolution and Behaviour Research Group, School of Biology and Psychology, University of Newcastle upon TyneHenry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2006-06-27
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
412-414
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2103958511
Cited by
1,304
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 54
FWCI
68.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Natural Field Experiments (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
eye images, cooperation, reputational concerns, honesty, naturalistic settings
MeSH terms
Attitude, Cooperative Behavior, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Social Behavior, Beneficence, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review