Cited by 111Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseAgriculture and Farm Safety

Suicide Rates by Occupational Group — 17 States, 2012

McIntosh, Wendy LiKamWa, Spies, Erica, Stone, Deborah M., Lokey, Colby N., Trudeau, Aimée-Rika T., Bartholow, Brad·2016·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

In 2012, approximately 40,000 suicides were reported in the United States, making suicide the 10th leading reported cause of death for persons aged ≥16 years (1). From 2000 to 2012, rates of suicide among persons in this age group increased 21.1%, from 13.3 per 100,000 to 16.1 (1). To inform suicide prevention efforts, CDC analyzed suicide by occupational group, by ascribing occupational codes to 12,312 suicides in 17 states in 2012 from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) (2). The frequency of suicide in different occupational groups was examined, and rates of suicide were calculated by sex and age group for these categories. Persons working in the farming, fishing, and forestry group had the highest rate of suicide overall (84.5 per 100,000 population) and among males (90.5); the highest rates of suicide among females occurred among those working in protective service occupations (14.1). Overall, the lowest rate of suicide (7.5) was found in the education, training, and library occupational group. Suicide prevention approaches directed toward persons aged ≥16 years that enhance social support, community connectedness, access to preventive services, and the reduction of stigma and barriers to help-seeking are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm6525a1This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paramedics and emergency service workers have higher rates of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and associated psychological morbidities, as well as a higher risk of burnout and higher risk of mortality.

    “Paramedics and emergency service workers have been reported to have higher rates of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and associated psychological morbidities, as well as a higher risk of burnout and higher risk of mortality (Blau, 2011; Clompus & Albarran, 2016; McIntosh et al., 2016; Sterud, Ekeberg, & Hem, 2006).”

    From Understanding the Occupational Factors that Influence Paramedic Health and Wellbeing (2024) · cites this paper as McIntosh et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McIntosh, W. L., Spies, E., Stone, D. M., Lokey, C. N., Trudeau, A.-R. T., & Bartholow, B.
Corresponding author
McIntosh, Wendy LiKamWa
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
65
Issue
25
Pages
641-645
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W2468515517
Cited by
111
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
26.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
Keywords
suicide, occupational groups, suicide rates, suicide prevention, National Violent Death Reporting System, sex differences, age groups, help-seeking, stigma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Suicide, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review