Cited by 4Food composition and propertiesSeed and Plant BiochemistryFood and Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Germinated Different Colored Bean Flours as Functional Ingredients on Technological, Bioactive and Sensory Quality of Rice Flour Muffins

Open access
Cakir, Elif, Kahraman, Sibel, Ozgolet, Muhammet, Karasu, Salih·2025·Italian Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Legumes are seen as an alternative protein source in the future. Germinated bean flours are increasingly incorporated into food formulations owing to their enhanced nutritional profiles. This study focuses on the development of novel gluten-free rice flour muffins enriched with five types of germinated bean flours: haricot bean, kidney bean, black bean, mung bean, and red bean flours. The research examines the impact of these germinated bean flours on the rheological properties of the muffin batter, as well as the physicochemical, bioactive, and sensory characteristics of the resulting muffins. It was found that adding germinated bean flours did not change the water retention capacity of rice flours but increased their oil retention capacity. Moisture content differed with germinated bean flours, and the lowest moisture content was determined in muffins containing kidney beans. The ash and protein ratio was found to be higher in muffins containing germinated legume flour. Protein content ranged between 8.82% and 13.56%, with the highest protein content determined in MMB muffins. The highest total phenolic content (TPC) values were determined in the muffin samples containing germınated mung bean flour, with the lowest observed in the control rıce muffın samples. The germınated harıcot bean and black bean flour-containing samples had similar phenolic content, with the highest determined in the germinated mung bean flour muffin samples. The antioxidant activities of the muffins were found to be statistically significant, with DPPH results in the 8.67 to 50.25 range. All n values of the batters were found below 1, also indicating non-Newtonian shear-thinning behavior. Germinated bean flours increased the consistency and viscoelastic structure of the batters. The batters of MRB muffins showed the highest regeneration and stiffness properties. Although germinated legume flours increased the hardness of the muffins during storage, it was determined that it was lower than the control wheat muffins and contributed positively to chewiness. MHB, MWC, and MBB were liked the most and were checked against MRC muffins, receiving higher scores. Germinated flour addition had a slowing effect on yeast and mold proliferation in muffins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15586/ijfs.v37i2.2880

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensory analysis of products made with bean composite flours generally shows better consumer acceptance when moderate amounts of bean flour are included.

    “Sensory analysis of products made with bean composite flours generally shows better consumer acceptance when moderate amounts of bean flour are included.”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Sensory properties of muffins section reports that muffins with haricot or black bean flour received higher overall acceptability scores than the rice-flour control. However, the study tested one bean-flour proportion (20%) in muffins, not whether moderate amounts generally improve acceptance across products or proportions. Its sensory panel comprised trained panelists, not a consumer sample (Sensory analysis section). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Muffins made from composite flour of different beans have a higher specific volume compared to muffins made with rice flour and a softer crumb than wheat flour muffins, although hardness increases with higher levels of germinated bean flour.

    “Cakir et al. [41], working with muffins made from composite flour of different beans, observed a higher specific volume compared to muffins made with rice flour and a softer crumb than wheatflour muffins, although hardness increased with higher levels of germinated bean flour.”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A muffin with 20% mung bean flour had a total phenolic content of 3.09 ± 0.04 GAE/g, and DPPH inhibition was 27.06% for muffins with 20% black bean flour and 50.25% for those with 20% mung bean flour.

    “A muffin with 20% mung bean flour had a total phenolic content of 3.09 ± 0.04 (gallic acid equivalent/g), and the DPPH inhibition was 27.06% for muffins with 20% black bean flour and 50.25% for those with 20% mung bean flour.”
  • Muffins made with germinated bean flour exhibit higher antioxidant activity than those made with wheat or rice flour.

    “Cakir et al. [41] found that muffins made with germinated bean flour exhibited higher antioxidant activity than those made with wheat or rice flour.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Balighi, F., Alami, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2024). Effect of replacing rice flour with raw and sprouted mung bean flour on the physico- chemical characteristics of gluten-free batter and cake. Food Research Journal, 34(3), 117-132.
  2. Lovis, L. (2003). Alternatives to wheat flour in baked goods. Cereal Foods World, 48(2), 61.
  3. Hafidh, R. R., Abdulamir, A., Vern, L. S., Bakar, F. A., Abas, F., Jahanshiri, F., & Sekawi, Z. (2011). Novel in-vitro antimicrobial activity of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek against highly resistant bac- terial and fungal pathogens. J. Med. Plants Res, 5(16), 3606-3618.
  4. jf060002o · DOI
  5. Yaver, E., & Bilgiçli, N. (2020). Effect of transglutaminase on quality attributes of noodle enriched with germinated mung bean flour. Gıda, 45(6), 1097-1108. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida. · DOI
  6. GD20069 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cakir, E., Kahraman, S., Ozgolet, M., & Karasu, S.
Affiliations
  • Istanbul Aydın University (TR)
  • Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Venue
Italian Journal of Food Science
Published
2025-01-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
65-81
ISSN
1120-1770 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409062804
Cited by
4
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Italian Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Yildiz Technical University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
legume flour, gluten-free bakery products, mung bean flour, red bean flour, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, batter rheology, protein content, sensory acceptability, storage stability, yeast and mold growth, alternative protein sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review