Cited by 20Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Determining the chronology of an archaeological site using radiocarbon: Minimizing uncertainty

Boaretto, Elisabetta·2007·Israel Journal of Earth Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1560/ijes.56.2-4.207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in EB I chronology are mostly due to how 14C dates are associated with archaeological contexts, which Egyptian chronology is used, and how correlations with south Levantine chronology are interpreted.

    “The differences in chronology for the EB I are mostly due to how the 14 C dates are associated with the archaeological contexts they purport to date (Boaretto 2007), which Egyptian chronology is used, and the way their correlations with south Levantine chronology are interpreted.”
  • Only a correct association of a sample to an archaeological context means that the date will provide meaningful results.

    “only a correct association of a sample to an archaeological context means that the date will provide meaningful results (Boaretto 2007).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boaretto, E.
Corresponding author
Boaretto, Elisabetta
Venue
Israel Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
207-216
ISSN
0021-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979106412
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Israel Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, archaeological site chronology, uncertainty reduction, radiocarbon calibration, stratigraphic dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review