The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incremental Sampling-based Algorithms for Optimal Motion Planning
Open accessAbstract
During the last decade, incremental sampling-based motion planning algorithms, such as the Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRTs), have been shown to work well in practice and to possess theoretical guarantees such as probabilistic completeness.However, no theoretical bounds on the quality of the solution obtained by these algorithms, e.g., in terms of a given cost function, have been established so far.The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap, by designing efficient incremental samplingbased algorithms with provable optimality properties.The first contribution of this paper is a negative result: it is proven that, under mild technical conditions, the cost of the best path returned by RRT converges almost surely to a non-optimal value, as the number of samples increases.Second, a new algorithm is considered, called the Rapidly-exploring Random Graph (RRG), and it is shown that the cost of the best path returned by RRG converges to the optimum almost surely.Third, a tree version of RRG is introduced, called RRT * , which preserves the asymptotic optimality of RRG while maintaining a tree structure like RRT.The analysis of the new algorithms hinges on novel connections between sampling-based motion planning algorithms and the theory of random geometric graphs.In terms of computational complexity, it is shown that the number of simple operations required by both the RRG and RRT * algorithms is asymptotically within a constant factor of that required by RRT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
Khatib, O. (1986) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498600500106 · Cited by 7,894
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343 · cited 2×
“In practical applications, the class of sampling-based motion planning algorithms, including, for instance, Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRMs) [17], [28], and Rapidly-exploring Random ar X iv :1 00 5.”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Polynomial Trajectory Planning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight in Dense Indoor Environments
Richter, C., Bry, A., & Roy, N. (2016) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28872-7_37 · Cited by 747
Learning Model Predictive Control for Iterative Tasks. A Data-Driven Control Framework
Rosolia, U., & Borrelli, F. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2017.2753460 · Cited by 341
Affordances from Human Videos as a Versatile Representation for Robotics
Bahl, S., Mendonca, R., Chen, L., Jain, U., & Pathak, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01324 · Cited by 119
Augmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Tasks
Nasiriany, S., Liu, H., & Zhu, Y. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812140 · Cited by 91
Towards learning-based planning: The nuPlan benchmark for real-world autonomous driving
Karnchanachari, N., Geromichalos, D., Tan, K. S., Li, N., Eriksen, C., Yaghoubi, S., Mehdipour, N., Bernasconi, G., Fong, W. K., Guo, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610077 · Cited by 46
Fair navigation planning: A resource for characterizing and designing fairness in mobile robots
Brandão, M., Jirotka, M., Webb, H., & Luff, P. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103259 · Cited by 35
Trumpp, R., Javanmardi, E., Nakazato, J., Tsukada, M., & Caccamo, M. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801657 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems VI
- Published
- 2010-06-27
- OpenAlex
- W1777783943
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.