The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Stochastic Grammar of Images
Abstract
This exploratory paper quests for a stochastic and context sensitive grammar of images. The grammar should achieve the following four objectives and thus serves as a unified framework of representation, learning, and recognition for a large number of object categories. (i) The grammar represents both the hierarchical decompositions from scenes, to objects, parts, primitives and pixels by terminal and non-terminal nodes and the contexts for spatial and functional relations by horizontal links between the nodes. It formulates each object category as the set of all possible valid configurations produced by the grammar. (ii) The grammar is embodied in a simple And–Or graph representation where each Or-node points to alternative sub-configurations and an And-node is decomposed into a number of components. This representation supports recursive top-down/bottom-up procedures for image parsing under the Bayesian framework and make it convenient to scale up in complexity. Given an input image, the image parsing task constructs a most probable parse graph on-the-fly as the output interpretation and this parse graph is a subgraph of the And–Or graph after making choice on the Or-nodes. (iii) A probabilistic model is defined on this And–Or graph representation to account for the natural occurrence frequency of objects and parts as well as their relations. This model is learned from a relatively small training set per category and then sampled to synthesize a large number of configurations to cover novel object instances in the test set. This generalization capability is mostly missing in discriminative machine learning methods and can largely improve recognition performance in experiments. (iv) To fill the well-known semantic gap between symbols and raw signals, the grammar includes a series of visual dictionaries and organizes them through graph composition. At the bottom-level the dictionary is a set of image primitives each having a number of anchor points with open bonds to link with other primitives. These primitives can be combined to form larger and larger graph structures for parts and objects. The ambiguities in inferring local primitives shall be resolved through top-down computation using larger structures. Finally these primitives forms a primal sketch representation which will generate the input image with every pixels explained. The proposal grammar integrates three prominent representations in the literature: stochastic grammars for composition, Markov (or graphical) models for contexts, and sparse coding with primitives (wavelets). It also combines the structure-based and appearance based methods in the vision literature. Finally the paper presents three case studies to illustrate the proposed grammar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
The Representation and Matching of Pictorial Structures
Fischler, M. A., & Elschlager, R. A. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1973.223602 · Cited by 1,322
Cited by
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges
Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., Mofijur, M., Shawkat Ali, A. B. M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 · Cited by 1,079
50 Years of object recognition: Directions forward
Andreopoulos, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2013) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2013.04.005 · Cited by 347
A Diagram is Worth a Dozen Images
Kembhavi, A., Salvato, M., Kolve, E., Seo, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_15 · Cited by 290
A Deep Structured Model with Radius–Margin Bound for 3D Human Activity Recognition
Lin, L., Wang, K., Zuo, W., Wang, M., Luo, J., & Zhang, L. (2016) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0876-z · Cited by 104
Deep Nets: What have They Ever Done for Vision?
Yuille, A. L., & Liu, C. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01405-z · Cited by 98
Progressively Parsing Interactional Objects for Fine Grained Action Detection
Ni, B., Yang, X., & Gao, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.116 · Cited by 69
Wasserstein Introspective Neural Networks
Lee, K., Xu, W., Fan, F., & Tu, Z. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00390 · Cited by 56
Meta-Sim: Learning to Generate Synthetic Datasets
Kar, A., Prakash, A., Liu, M.-Y., Cameracci, E., Yuan, J., Rusiniak, M., Acuna, D., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00465 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, S.-C., & Mumford, D.
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 259-362
- ISSN
- 1572-2740 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-2759
- OpenAlex
- W4205969993
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.