Cited by 6Island Studies and Pacific AffairsDigital Education and SocietyOnline and Blended Learning

Pacific relationalities in a critical digital space: The Wellington southerlies as a leadership experience

Open access
Sanga, Kabini, Reynolds, Martyn, Ormond, Adreanne, Southon, Pine·2021·Waikato Journal of Education

Abstract

Understanding, articulating and managing relationality, the state of being related, is a central feature of research, teaching and other people-centred matters in the Pacific. Although various groups in this diverse region, Indigenous and otherwise, bring their own concepts and protocols to relationships, physical, social and spiritual connection are salient. Connection is most visible between people but also extends to other entities, including land. Recent events have accelerated the significance of connections constructed in virtual space, such as through conference calls augmented to facilitate presentation and discussion. This phenomenon, relatively new in Pacific academic practice, re-draws attention to relationality in a novel context. In this article we look at one such initiative through the lens of relational leadership to understand the role of leadership in the deliberate curation of a virtual space. The setting is the inaugural Wellington southerlies virtual tok stori. This event, attended by over 90 students and academics from across the region, is discussed through the experiences of four of the events' instigators who were also active during the session as co-presenters, chair and Hautohu Matua or advisor. The discussion examines how the experience of Pacific orality affected our (re)framing of leadership in a digital space. Our learning points to ways relationality may be invoked, enabled and shaped by dialogic, relational leadership in virtual spaces so as to mediate limitations and construct new possibilities in a world where technology is fast affecting the ways we gather information and communicate one with another.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15663/wje.v26i1.780

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge transmission and knowledge repositories take place within Pacific relationalities.

    “Furthermore, knowledge transmission and knowledge repositories take place within Pacific relationalities (Anae, 2019; Pacific Early Career Researchers Collective et al., 2022; Sanga et al., 2021).”

    From Decolonising Qualitative Analysis: Collectively Weaving Understanding Using Talanoa and Fa'afaletui Pacific-Indigenous Research Methods (2024) · cites this paper as Sanga et al., 2021

    The Introduction and Pacific oralities sections (page numbers unavailable) describe Pacific methodologies as relational and tok stori as dialogue in a relationally constructed space. This supports knowledge being shared within Pacific relationalities, but the paper does not address knowledge repositories or establish that they exist within those relationships. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Jones, S. H. (2017). Autoethnography. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731. · DOI
  2. Affonso, D. D., Mayberry, L., Inaba, A., Matsuno, R., & Robinson, E. (1996). Hawaiian-style "talkstory": Psychosocial assessment and intervention during and after pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 25(9), 737-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1996.tb01489.x · DOI
  3. Baice, T., Lealaiauloto, B., Meiklejohn-Whiu, S., Fonua, S. M., Allen, J. M., Matapo, J., Iosefo, F., & Fa'avae, D. (2021). Responding to the call: talanoa, va-vā, early career network and enabling academic pathways at a university in New Zealand. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1852187 · DOI
  4. Blakesley, S. (2010). Storytelling as an insightful tool for understanding educational leadership in Indigenous Yukon contexts. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 111. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ907029.pdf
  5. Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2009), Autoethnography. Geography Compass, 3, 1660-1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00279.x · DOI
  6. Carling, J., Erdal, M. B., & Ezzati, R. (2014). Beyond the insider-outsider divide in migration research. Migration Studies, 2(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa016 · DOI
  7. Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. (2016). Collaborative autoethnography. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315432137 · DOI
  8. Cobb, D. J., Couch, D., & Fonua, S. M. (2019). Exploring, celebrating, and deepening Oceanic relationalities. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 18(2), 1-10.
  9. Crossa, V. (2012). Relational positionality: Conceptualizing research, power, and the everyday politics of neoliberalization in Mexico City. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 11(1), 110-132. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084663-9 · DOI
  10. Davidson, A. J. (2012). Enlarging the field of credible experience: Supporting young Solomon Islanders as agents of positive change in their communities [Doctoral thesis].
  11. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273-290.
  12. Enari, D., & Matapo, J. (2020). Pasifika education innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic. MAI Journal, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.20507/MAIJournal.2020.9.4.2 · DOI
  13. Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 104-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003 · DOI
  14. Evans, T., Guy, R., Honan, E., Paraide, P., & Muspratt, S. (2010). Reflections on conducting educational research projects in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 4(2), 72-89.
  15. Fasavalu, T. I., & Reynolds, M. (2019). Relational positioning and a learning disposition: Shifting the conversation. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 18, 11-25.
  16. Gold, M., Swann, J., & Chief, I. Y. (2002). Keeping it flexible: Integrating technology into distance education in the South Pacific. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 55-59.
  17. Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514 · DOI
  18. Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960801976321 · DOI
  19. Hau'ofa, E. (1994). Our sea of islands. The Contemporary Pacific, 6(1), 148-161.
  20. Henry, E., & Wolfgramm, R. (2018). Relational leadership-An indigenous Māori perspective. Leadership, 14(2), 203-219.
  21. Houston, J. (2007). Indigenous autoethnography: Formulating our knowledge, our way. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004695 · DOI
  22. Inckle, K. (2010). Telling tales? Using ethnographic fictions to speak embodied 'truth'. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348681 · DOI
  23. Jones, S. H. (2007). Autethnography. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518. · DOI
  24. Kabutaulaka, T. (2015). Re-presenting Melanesia: Ignoble savages and Melanesian alter-natives. The Contemporary Pacific, 27(1), 110-145. https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2015.0027 · DOI
  25. Kempf, W. (2017). Climate change, Christian religion and songs: Revisiting the Noah story in the central Pacific. In E. Dürr & A. Pascht (Eds.), Environmental transformations and cultural responses: Ontologies, discourses, and practices in Oceania (pp. 19-48). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53349-4_2 · DOI
  26. Kenyon, M., Chevalier, C., Gagahe, V., & Sisiolo, R. (2000). The community in the classroom: Designing a distance education community health course for nurses in Solomon Islands. Pacific Health Dialog, 7(2), 76-80.
  27. Ketokivi, K. (2010). The relational self, the social bond and the dynamics of personal relationships: A sociological analysis (vol. 263). Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Finland.
  28. Kincheloe, J., & Mclaren, P. (2011). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In K. Hayes S. R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 285-326). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-397-6_23 · DOI
  29. MacDonald, L., & Reynolds, M. (2017). It's all part of the job: Everyday silencing in the life of a secondary school teacher. MAI Journal, 6(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.20507/MAIJournal.2017.6.1.4 · DOI
  30. McCormick, A., & Johannson-Fua, S. (2019). Perspectives on comparative and international education in Oceania. In C. C. Wolhuter & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Comparative and international education: Survey of an infinite field (pp. 229-248). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479- 367920190000036013 · DOI
  31. Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370120490 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Oc, B., & Bashshur, M. R. (2013). Followership, leadership and social influence. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 919-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Paulsen, I., & Spratt, R. (2020). When evaluation and learning are the intervention. In S. Johannson- Fua, R. Jesson, R. Spratt, & E. Coxon (Eds.), Relationality and learning in Oceania (pp. 135-153). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004425316_009 · DOI
  34. Raturi, S., Hogan, R., & Thaman, K. H. (2011). Learners' access to tools and experience with technology at the University of the South Pacific: Readiness for e-learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.952 · DOI
  35. Sanga, K., Maebuta, J., Johansson-Fua, S., & Reynolds, M. (2020). Re-thinking contextualisation in Solomon Islands school leadership professional learning and development. Pacific Dynamics, 4(1), 17-29.
  36. Sanga, K., & Reynolds, M. (2017). To know more of what it is and what it is not: Pacific research on the move. Pacific Dynamics, 1(2), 199-204.
  37. Sanga, K., & Reynolds, M. (2019). Melanesian tok stori in leadership development: Ontological and relational implications for donor-funded programmes in the Western Pacific. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 17(4), 11-26.
  38. Sanga, K., Reynolds, M., Paulsen, I., Spratt, R., & Maneipuri, J. (2018). A tok stori about tok stori: Melanesian relationality in action as research, leadership and scholarship. Global Comparative Education, 2(1), 3-19. https://www.theworldcouncil.net/uploads/8/6/2/1/86214440/gce_wccesjournal_vol2-no1.pdf
  39. Thomas, R. (2005). Honouring the oral traditions of my ancestors through storytelling. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches (vol. 237, pp. 237-254). Canadian Scholars Press.
  40. Van Heekeren, D. (2014). Naming, mnemonics, and the poetics of knowing in Vula'a oral traditions. Oceania, 84(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5050 · DOI
  41. Whelan, R. (2008). Use of ICT in education in the South Pacific: Findings of the Pacific eLearning Observatory. Distance Education, 29(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004845 · DOI
  42. Wolfgramm-Foliaki, E., Smith, H., & Hattori, M. (2018). Indigenous methodologies: Charting our collective journey. A talanoa panel [Paper presentation]. The (Re) Mapping Indigenous & Settler Geographies in the Pacific Conference. https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/45503

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanga, K., Reynolds, M., Ormond, A., & Southon, P.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Venue
Waikato Journal of Education
Published
2021-07-05
ISSN
1173-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185372292
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waikato journal of education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Victoria University of Wellington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
relationality, relational leadership, virtual space, indigenous leadership, digital communication, dialogic leadership, virtual conference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review