Cited by 145Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

Knowledge and Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Provincial Survey Study of Medical Students

Open access
Mehta, Nishila, Harish, Vinyas, Bilimoria, Krish, Morgado, Felipe, Ginsburg, Shiphra, Law, Marcus, Das, Sunit·2021·MedEdPublish

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background There has been growing acknowledgement that undergraduate medical education (UME) must play a formal role in instructing future physicians on the promises and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI), as these tools are integrated into medical practice. Methods We conducted an exploratory survey of medical students’ knowledge of AI, perceptions on the role of AI in medicine, and preferences surrounding the integration of AI competencies into medical education. The survey was completed by 321 medical students (13.4% response rate) at four medical schools in Ontario. Results Medical students are generally optimistic regarding AI’s capabilities to carry out a variety of healthcare functions, from clinical to administrative, with reservations about specific task types such as personal counselling and empathetic care. They believe AI will raise novel ethical and social challenges. Students are concerned about how AI will affect the medical job market, with 25% responding that it was actively impacting their choice of specialty. Students agree that medical education must do more to prepare them for the impact of AI in medicine (79%), and the majority (68%) believe that this training should begin at the UME level. Conclusions Medical students expect AI will be widely integrated into healthcare and are enthusiastic to obtain AI competencies in undergraduate medical education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15694/mep.2021.000075.1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249830; this version posted January 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint · DOI
  2. American Medical Association Board Report. (2018) Health care augmented intelligence: Where the AMA stands. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-08/ai-2018board-policy-summary.pdf
  3. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249830; this version posted January 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, N., Harish, V., Bilimoria, K., Morgado, F., Ginsburg, S., Law, M., & Das, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Mehta, Nishila
Venue
MedEdPublish
Published
2021
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2312-7996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3151514856
Cited by
145
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • MedEdPublish (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Division of Undergraduate Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, medical students, knowledge and attitudes, undergraduate medical education, AI competencies, AI ethics, societal impact of AI, specialty choice, empathy in patient care, Ontario

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review