Cited by 141Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Meta-analysis of rare and adverse event data

Sutton, Alexander J, Cooper, Nicola J, Lambert, Paul C, Jones, David R, Abrams, Keith R, Sweeting, Michael J·2002·Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Abstract

Potentially beneficial drugs may have side effects. Such adverse events may be serious but rare, making their effect difficult to quantify, or even their identification problematic within randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis provides a means of combining such outcome data across a series of studies and provides a more powerful analysis than is possible from a single study. However, meta-analysis of adverse event data presents some unique methodological challenges. Procedural issues pertaining to study selection and the inclusion of both randomized and observational data are discussed. The statistical problem of combining rare outcomes is also considered at length. Model choice, continuity corrections, exact statistics, Bayesian methods and sensitivity analysis are all covered. The application of results from adverse event meta-analyses to clinical and economic decision models is also considered. A number of examples are presented to illustrate the key points.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/14737167.2.4.367

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutton, A. J., Cooper, N. J., Lambert, P. C., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Sweeting, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Venue
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Published
2002-08
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
367-379
ISSN
  • 1473-7167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8379
OpenAlex
W2122849467
Cited by
141
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
adverse drug reactions, rare outcomes, meta-analysis methodology, study selection, continuity correction, Bayesian analysis, sensitivity analysis, model selection, economic decision models, clinical decision model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review