Reliability and validity of the Mongolian version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview
Open accessAbstract
[Purpose] Our study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of the translated Mongolian version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI). [Participants and Methods] We obtained the basic information of patients and their caregivers when they were hospitalized (Study 1). Subsequently, after the hospital discharged the patients, the caregivers answered the ZBI by telephone during the 4th and 5th weeks (Studies 2 and 3, respectively). To evaluate reliability, we calculated the correlation coefficient, compared the total scores of the ZBI obtained in Studies 2 and 3, and calculated Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To evaluate validity, we calculated the correlation coefficient of the score of item 22 and the sum of the scores of items 1-21. [Results] The correlation coefficient for reliability was high, and the difference between the two studies was insignificant. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92. The correlation coefficient was high for validity as well. [Conclusion] The Mongolian version of the ZBI has high reliability and validity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CQOLC scale has adequate psychometric properties: test-retest reliability of 0.95, internal consistency of 0.9, and a four-factor structure.
“Esta herramienta presentó adecuadas propiedades psicométricas, con una confiabilidad test-retest de 0,95, consistencia interna de 0,9 y análisis factorial de estructura de cuatro factores (28-30).”
From Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results and Discussion report psychometric findings for the Mongolian Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI), not the CQOLC. They give a test–retest correlation of 0.95 and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.92 for the ZBI; the paper does not report a four-factor structure for CQOLC. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Zarit Burden scale has been validated in several countries, including China, Croatia, Italy, Jamaica, Brazil, Spain, and Portugal.
“La escala EZ ha sido validada en varios países, como China (19), Croacia (20), Italia (21), Jamaica (22), Brasil (23), España y Portugal (24).”
From Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation is attached to Spain and Portugal. The Introduction and Discussion discuss validation in other languages, but our copy does not mention Spanish or Portuguese validation; searches for Spain, Portugal, Spanish, and Portuguese found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hébert, R., Bravo, G., & Préville, M. (2000) · Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · doi:10.1017/s0714980800012484 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview
Arai, Y., Kudo, K., Hosokawa, T., Washio, M., Miura, H., & Hisamichi, S. (1997) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.1997.tb03199.x · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview: Development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version.
Lu, L., Wang, L., Yang, X., & Feng, Q. (2009) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.02019.x · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Taub, A., Andreoli, S. B., & Bertolucci, P. H. F. (2004) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2004000200004 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Rajabi‐Mashhadi, M. T., Mashhadinejad, H., Ebrahimzadeh, M. A., Golhasani‐Keshtan, F., Ebrahimi, H., & Zarei, Z. (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Parpa, E., Katsantonis, N., Tsilika, E., Galanos, A., Papazoglou, I., & Mystakidou, K. (2017) · International Journal of Mental Health & Psychiatry · doi:10.4172/2471-4372.1000145 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Reliability and Validity of the Abbreviated Turkish Version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview
Yıldız, G. B., Yaci, O., Akça, Z. K., & Kulaksızoğlu, I. B. (2016) · Bezmialem Science · doi:10.14235/bs.2016.489 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Support of Physical Therapy Education in Mongolia
Nakazawa, R., Sakamoto, M., & Oidov, B. (2011) · The Kitakanto Medical Journal · doi:10.2974/kmj.61.537 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation[The Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview].
Arai, Y. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [4]Baast G: Developments in the medical system and international exchange in Mongolia. J Int Univ Health Welf, 2018, 23: 86– 94.
- 7) Ishikura K: Education, medical and social welfare for disabled persons in Mongolia. Hyogo University of Teacher Education Journal, 2012, 40: 37– 50.
- [18]Sakamoto M Ogawa N: Welfare culture in Mongolia and in Japan: a comparative view. Bull North Reg Res Cent Hum Serv Stud, 2002, 8: 65– 74.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domínguez-Vergara, J., Santa-Cruz-Espinoza, H., & Chávez-Ventura, G. (2023) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe13020029 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
RetractedWalkowiak, D., Jabkowski, P., & Domaradzki, J. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03391-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Armah, E. D., & Ali, I. S. (2024) · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) · doi:10.3991/ijep.v14i5.47841 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado
Hernández Castillo, C. I., Muñoz Medina, S. E., & Sánchez Pedraza, R. (2024) · Avances en Enfermería · doi:10.15446/av.enferm.v42n1.106557 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yamaguchi, M., Uga, D., Nakazawa, R., & Sakamoto, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Rehabilitation, Mie Respiratory Swallowing Rehabilitation Clinic: 14-7 Iris, Kameyama, Mie 519-0171, Japan
- Jobu University (JP)
- Gunma University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamaguchi, Maika
- ORCID
- Sakamoto, Masaaki
- Venue
- Journal of Physical Therapy Science
- Publisher
- Society of Physical Therapy Science
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 449-453
- ISSN
- 0915-5287 (ISSN-L)
- 2187-5626
- PMC
- PMC7344279
- OpenAlex
- W3040157610
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Physical Therapy Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Zarit Burden Interview, caregiver burden, Mongolian translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability statistics, validity, psychometric properties, family caregivers, hospitalized patients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
