Cited by 43Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being Studies

Social support network and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients

Open access
Costa, David Castro, Sá, Maria José, Calheiros, José Manuel·2017·Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To analyse the relationship between the social support network (SSN) and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods The sample comprised 150 consecutive MS patients attending our MS clinic. To assess the socio-demographic data, a specifically designed questionnaire was applied. The HRQOL dimensions were measured with the Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire-SF36 and the SSN with the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. Spearman’s correlation was used to compare the magnitude of the relationship between the SSN and HRQOL. Results The mean patient age was 41.7 years (± 10.4; range: 18–70 yr); the mean Expanded Disability Status Score was 2.5 (±2.4; range: 0–9). There was a statistically significant correlation between the structure of the SSN and the HRQOL. Conclusion The composition of the SSN, social group membership and participation in voluntary work have an important role in the HRQOL of patients with MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0004-282x20170036

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, D. C., Sá, M. J., & Calheiros, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital de São João (PT)
  • Centro Hospitalar São João, Portugal; Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Portugal
  • University of Beira Interior (PT)
Venue
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Published
2017-05
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
267-271
ISSN
0004-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2624279206
Cited by
43
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, social support networks, health-related quality of life, social group membership, volunteering, SF-36, MOS Social Support Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review