Cited by 39Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Clinical and demographic differences between voluntary and involuntary psychiatric admissions in a university hospital in Brazil

Open access
Chang, Tais Michele Minatogawa, Ferreira, Luiz Kobuti, Ferreira, Montezuma Pimenta, Hirata, Edson Shiguemi·2013·Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Abstract

To assess the frequency of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations from 2001 to 2008 and to determine associated clinical and socio-demographic characteristics, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. Adult admission data were collected from a university hospital in Brazil. Hospitalizations were classified as voluntary (VH) or involuntary (IH). Groups were compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for continuous non-parametric variables. The relative risk of certain events was estimated by the odds ratio statistic. Of 2,289 admissions, 13.3% were IH. The proportion of IH increased from 2.5% to 21.2% during the eight year period. IH were more frequently associated with female gender, unmarried status, unemployment, and more than 9 years of schooling. Psychotic symptoms were more common among IH. There were no differences in age, duration of hospitalization, or rate of attendance at first appointment after hospital discharge. Understanding of the characteristics associated with IH is necessary to improve the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/0102-311x00041313

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission.

    “In general, these studies found either no difference in the clinical effects of involuntary admission (27,40–45) or greater improvements in clinical symptoms and functioning than for voluntary patients (46,47).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results (page not specified) report no difference between involuntary and voluntary admissions in hospital-stay duration or attendance at the first appointment after discharge. The paper does not report comparable changes in symptoms or functioning, so those findings support only a narrower claim than no difference in clinical effects. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gonçalves RW, Vieira FS, Delgado PG. Mental health policy in Brazil: federal expenditure evolu- tion between 2001 and 2009. Rev Saúde Pública 2012; 46:51-8.
  2. Riecher-Rössler A, Rössler W. Compulsory admis- sion of psychiatric patients: an international com- parison. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 87:231-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, T. M. M., Ferreira, L. K., Ferreira, M. P., & Hirata, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Published
2013-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
2347-2352
ISSN
0102-311X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052667043
Cited by
39
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric admission, psychiatric hospitalization, sociodemographic factors, psychotic symptoms, gender differences, marital status, unemployment, educational attainment, post-discharge follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Brazil, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review