Cited by 12Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The association between perceived coercion on admission and formal coercive practices in an inpatient psychiatric setting

Open access
O'Callaghan, Aoife K., Plunkett, Róisín, Kelly, Brendan D.·2021·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Involuntary care is a feature of mental health services around the world. In addition to involuntary admission and treatment, specific coercive practices include seclusion and physical restraint. Our study aimed to determine the relationships, if any, between these practices and perceived coercion on admission among psychiatry inpatients in Ireland, as well as any relationships between perceived coercion on admission and variables such as age, gender and diagnosis. We included 107 psychiatry inpatients aged 18 years or over who were admitted to the acute psychiatry admission units in Tallaght University Hospital and Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period between September 2017 and February 2020. Over a quarter (27.1%) of participating patients had involuntary status; nine (8.4%) had experienced at least one episode of seclusion, and ten (9.3%) had experienced at least one episode of restraint. Perceived coercion on admission was significantly associated with involuntary status and female gender; perceived negative pressures on admission were significantly associated with involuntary status and positive symptoms of schizophrenia; perceived procedural injustice on admission was significantly associated with fewer negative symptoms, involuntary status, cognitive impairment and female gender; and negative affective reactions to hospitalisation on admission were significantly associated with birth in Ireland and being employed. Total score across these four subscales was significantly associated with involuntary status and positive symptoms, and had borderline significant associations with birth in Ireland, being employed and female gender. Overall, perceived coercion on admission, assessed in retrospect by the patient, is more closely associated with involuntary status and symptoms than it is with subsequent formal coercive practices, such as seclusion and restraint. The role of gender merits particular attention in future research, especially in relation to procedural injustice on admission and perceived coercion on admission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101680

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being employed was associated with lower perceived coercion in three studies.

    “Being employed was associated with lower perceived coercion in three studies [116,117,137].”

    From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [137]

    In Results §3.3 (page unavailable), employment had a negative association with the overall Admission Experience Survey score, but the paper describes it as borderline significant (p = 0.047). Employment was not significantly associated with the survey’s perceived-coercion subscale (Table 2). This supports a qualified association with the overall admission-experience measure, not the claim that employment was associated with lower perceived coercion in this study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People are less satisfied with involuntary care as measured by measures of humiliation and negative affective response.

    “In general, most literature indicates that people are less satisfied with involuntary care as measured by structured assessment tools including the Client Assessment of Treatment Scale or the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (10,13,66,104–110) and measures of humiliation and negative affective response (24,110,111).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 3.3 reports that involuntary status was associated with greater perceived coercion, negative pressures and procedural injustice on admission, supporting a less positive experience of involuntary care. But it does not measure satisfaction or humiliation, and it associates negative affective reactions with birthplace and employment rather than involuntary status. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Involuntary treatment was associated with an increased risk of the admission being perceived as coercive or procedurally unfair when compared to those receiving voluntary care.

    “Involuntary treatment is by definition associated with objective coercion, but it was also associated with an increased risk of the admission being perceived as coercive (for example experiencing a lack of control or agency) or procedurally unfair when compared to those receiving voluntary care (10,11,15,18–31).”
  • Two studies found no association between seclusion or restraint and perceived coercion at admission.

    “However, two studies found no association between seclusion or restraint and perceived coercion at admission [137,151]”
  • While most studies did not find significant associations, ten did report higher levels of perceived coercion among women.

    “While most studies did not find significant associations, ten did report higher levels of perceived coercion among women [35,36,45,71,89,94,96,99,112,137].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Callaghan, A. K., Plunkett, R., & Kelly, B. D.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Galway (IE)
  • Tallaght University Hospital (IE)
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
75
Pages
101680
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132232109
Cited by
12
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, involuntary admission, seclusion, physical restraint, coercive practices, psychiatric inpatients, procedural injustice, gender differences, schizophrenia symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Coercion, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Psychiatry, Restraint, Physical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review