Cited by 13Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPatient Dignity and PrivacyPsychiatric care and mental health services

Dignity, coercion and involuntary psychiatric care: A study of involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients in Dublin

Plunkett, R., O’Callaghan, A. K., Kelly, B. D.·2022·International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of research about psychiatric inpatients' experience of dignity. Most of the limited literature on this topic is qualitative. Our study provides quantitative data about self-rated dignity among involuntary and voluntary psychiatry inpatients. We explore relationships between perceived dignity and legal status, coercion, level of insight, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance, among other parameters. METHODS: We recruited 107 participants aged 18 years or over from two inpatient psychiatric units in Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period. Interviews consisted of structured, validated assessment tools. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patient charts. RESULTS: Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) score was non-normally distributed (skewed to the right), with a median score of 63.0 out of 125 (inter-quartile range: 40.0-80.0). On multi-variable testing, lower self-rated dignity was associated with higher perceived coercion, better insight and more negative symptoms. There was no association between dignity and gender, employment status, marital status, ethnicity, age, admission status, diagnosis, working alliance, positive symptoms or cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of dignity is linked with perceived coercion and negative symptoms, and is seen in patients with better insight. These links merit further study if we are to understand patient dignity in a more nuanced and useful way.KEYPOINTSWe interviewed psychiatric inpatients using the Patient Dignity Inventory and other structured assessment tools.There was no significant difference between voluntary and involuntary patient groups' self-rated dignity.Less self-rated dignity was seen in patients with higher levels of perceived coercion.Patients with better insight reported lower dignity.Dignity scores were not significantly associated with age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis or length of stay in hospital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13651501.2021.2022162

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Involuntary treatment was generally associated with longer length of stay than was voluntary care.

    “Involuntary treatment was generally associated with longer length of stay than was voluntary care (58,68,89,117–120), with the exception of one study (121).”
  • Other factors such as logistical and bureaucratic issues or bed availability may also affect length of stay for involuntary patients.

    “This may be in part because involuntary treatment is often used for people with more severe illness or with conditions such as psychosis that take a greater period of time to resolve (89,118,119), although other factors such as logistical and bureaucratic issues or bed availability may also affect length of stay for involuntary patients (64,68,120).”
  • Higher perceived coercion scores were associated with lower self-dignity ratings by patients.

    “Additionally, higher perceived coercion scores were associated with lower self-dignity ratings by patients [144]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plunkett, R., O’Callaghan, A. K., & Kelly, B. D.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Plunkett, R.
Venue
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Published
2022-01-09
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
269-276
ISSN
  • 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1788
OpenAlex
W4206685030
Cited by
13
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
patient dignity, involuntary psychiatric treatment, coercion, psychiatric inpatients, Patient Dignity Inventory, insight, negative symptoms, therapeutic relationship, voluntary admission, legal status
MeSH terms
Respect, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review