Cited by 24Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Impulsivity influences food intake in women with generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Fonseca, Natasha Kim de O. da, Molle, Roberta D., Costa, Marianna de A., Gonçalves, Francine G., Silva, Alice C., Rodrigues, Ylana, Price, Menna, Silveira, Patrícia P. +1 more·2020·Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Eating behavior is affected by psychological and neurocognitive factors. However, little is known about this relationship in anxious patients. Our aim was to investigate the associations between impulsivity, inhibitory control, energy-dense food consumption, and body mass index (BMI) in women with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 51 adult females with GAD answered the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and participated in a go/no-go task using food images. Anthropometric measurements were evaluated. A food frequency questionnaire and a snack test were used to study eating behavior. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were performed to analyze the variables of interest, adjusted by age. RESULTS: Impulsivity predicted intake of sugar (p = 0.016, 95%CI 0.67-6.05), total fat (p = 0.007, 95%CI 0.62-3.71), and saturated fat (p = 0.004, 95%CI 0.30-1.48). The snack test showed a positive correlation between presence of impulsivity and intake of biscuits (R = 0.296; p = 0.051). Response inhibition to food images in the go/no-go task paradigm did not predict BMI or food intake. CONCLUSION: Impulsivity was predictive of higher sugar and saturated fat intake in women diagnosed with GAD. Our findings add to the literature regarding the association between neuropsychological factors and food consumption in this specific population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0556

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fonseca, N. K. D. O. D., Molle, R. D., Costa, M. D. A., Gonçalves, F. G., Silva, A. C., Rodrigues, Y., Price, M., Silveira, P. P., & Manfro, G. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Fonseca, Natasha Kim de O. da
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020-08
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
382-388
ISSN
  • 1516-4446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1809-452X
OpenAlex
W3005742065
Cited by
24
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (478820/2010)
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
impulsivity, generalized anxiety disorder, dietary intake, dietary habits, inhibitory control, response inhibition, energy-dense foods, sugar consumption, saturated fat intake, body mass index, women, go/no-go task, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review