Cited by 13Food Supply Chain TraceabilityFood Safety and HygieneConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumers value healthy eating and environmental responsibility: how negative food contexts aid decision-making

Open access
DANG, Huy Duc, TRAN, Giang Thanh·2020·Food Science and Technology

Abstract

The research aims to explore consumers’ intention toward traceable food in the dual context of the animal disease outbreak (i.e. African Swine Fever - ASF) and the current food safety issues. An extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) model was used to predict purchase intention/attitude toward traceable pork. The study employed the structural equation modeling (SEM) to extract insights from the dataset of 230 students in Vietnam. The current detrimental context of food safety deemed promoting the consumption of traceable food, a risk-mitigating alternative. Healthy and environmentally responsible consumers held positive standpoints toward traceable pork as a solution to fulfill their responsibility with the environment and healthy eating lifestyle. The extended model was promising in explaining 52% of the variance of the purchase intention. The study confirmed both the positive impacts of the long-lasting unsafe food issues and the short-term animal disease outbreak on intention toward traceable food. To promote traceable food, industry food marketers should tailor their marketing and communication strategies to target healthy and responsible eaters.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/fst.28120

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 2019, Việt Nam chống chọi với dịch tả heo Châu Phi, BBC News
  2. Buaprommee N., 2016, The antecedents of purchase intention of meat with traceability in Thai consumers, Asia Pacific Management Review, 21, 161, 10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.03.001 · DOI
  3. Chen M. F., 2009, Attitude toward organic foods among Taiwanese as related to health consciousness, environmental attitudes, and the mediating effects of a healthy lifestyle, British Food Journal, 111, 165, 10.1108/00070700910931986 · DOI
  4. Chen M. F., 2013, The impacts of the food traceability system and consumer involvement on consumers’ purchase intentions toward fast foods, Food Control, 33, 313, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.03.022 · DOI
  5. Choe Y. C., 2009, Effect of the food traceability system for building trust: price premium and buying behavior, Information Systems Frontiers, 11, 167, 10.1007/s10796-008-9134-z · DOI
  6. Choi J., 2013, The effects of consumers’ perceived risk and benefit on attitude and behavioral intention: A study of street food, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30, 222, 10.1080/10548408.2013.774916 · DOI
  7. Dang D. H., 2019, Vietnamese consumers’ preferences for traceable food and safety attributes: The case of water spinach, Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 26, 47
  8. Demirtas B., 2019, Assessment of the impacts of the consumers’ awareness of organic food on consumption behavior, Food Science and Technology, 39, 881, 10.1590/fst.10518 · DOI
  9. Fornell C., 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hair Jr. J. F., 2014, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research, European Business Review, 26, 106, 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hsu C.-L., 2014, Explaining consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward organic food: contributions from regulatory fit and consumer characteristics, Food Quality and Preference, 35, 6, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.005 · DOI
  12. Hsu S.-Y., 2016, An analysis of purchase intentions toward organic food on health consciousness and food safety with/under structural equation modeling, British Food Journal, 118, 200, 10.1108/BFJ-11-2014-0376 · DOI
  13. Jacintho C. L. A. B., 2020, Brazilian food labeling: a new proposal and its impact on consumer understanding, Food Science and Technology, 40, 222, 10.1590/fst.39518 · DOI
  14. Jitrawang P., 2019, Factors influencing purchase intention of organic rice in Thailand, Journal of Food Products Marketing, 25, 805, 10.1080/10454446.2019.1679690 · DOI
  15. Kock N., 2011, Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: mediating effects, control and second order variables, and algorithm choices, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7, 1, 10.4018/jec.2011070101 · DOI
  16. Kock N., 2015, Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11, 1, 10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kock N., 2012, Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3, 546, 10.17705/1jais.00302 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lobb A. E., 2007, Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour, Food Quality and Preference, 18, 384, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.004 · DOI
  19. Menozzi D., 2015, Motives towards traceable food choice: a comparison between French and Italian consumers, Food Control, 49, 40, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.006 · DOI
  20. Muringai V., 2018, Trust and consumer risk perceptions regarding BSE and chronic wasting disease, Agribusiness, 34, 240, 10.1002/agr.21524 · DOI
  21. My N. H. D., 2017, Consumers’ familiarity with and attitudes towards food quality certifications for rice and vegetables in Vietnam, Food Control, 82, 74, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.011 · DOI
  22. Nguyen N. K., 2019, The effects of perceived risk on consumer attitudes, intentions, and behavior regarding pork purchases in Ho Chi Minh City, DLU Journal of Science, 9, 18
  23. Nguyen V. N., 2015, Sustainability in pig value chain in Dong Nai, Viet Nam: a viewpoint from social perspective – food safety, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 4, 35
  24. Prakash G., 2017, Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: a study on developing nation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116 · DOI
  25. Schuch A. F., 2019, Chicken nuggets packaging attributes impact on consumer purchase intention, Food Science and Technology, 39, 152, 10.1590/fst.41317 · DOI
  26. Singh A., 2017, Factors influencing Indian consumers’ actual buying behaviour towards organic food products, Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 473, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.106 · DOI
  27. Spence M., 2018, Exploring consumer purchase intentions towards traceable minced beef and beef steak using the theory of planned behavior, Food Control, 91, 138, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.035 · DOI
  28. Teng C.-C., 2016, Organic food consumption in Taiwan: motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty, Appetite, 105, 95, 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.006 · DOI
  29. Teng C.-C., 2015, Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions, British Food Journal, 117, 1066, 10.1108/BFJ-12-2013-0361 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Van Loo E. J., 2013, Consumer attitudes, knowledge, and consumption of organic yogurt, Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 2118, 10.3168/jds.2012-6262 · DOI
  31. Van Rijswijk W., 2012, Consumer needs and requirements for food and ingredient traceability information, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 282, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01001.x · DOI
  32. Wee C. S., 2014, Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products, Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3, 378
  33. Yadav R., 2016, Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation, Appetite, 96, 122, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.017 · DOI
  34. Yazdanpanah M., 2015, Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food, Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 342, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071 · DOI
  35. Yeung R., 2010, The effects of risk-reducing strategies on consumer perceived risk and on purchase likelihood, British Food Journal, 112, 306, 10.1108/00070701011029174 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DANG, H. D., & TRAN, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
  • Nong Lam University, Vietnam
Venue
Food Science and Technology
Published
2020-10-19
ISSN
  • 0101-2061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1678-457X
OpenAlex
W3094058003
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
purchase intention, food safety, animal disease outbreaks, African swine fever, healthy eating, environmental responsibility, theory of planned behavior, consumer attitudes, food marketing strategy, risk mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review