Cited by 53Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCognitive Abilities and Testing

Methylphenidate as a cognitive enhancer in healthy young people

Open access
Batistela, Silmara, Bueno, Orlando Francisco Amodeo, Vaz, Leonardo José, Galduróz, José Carlos Fernandes·2016·Dementia & Neuropsychologia

Abstract

ABSTRACT The so-called cognitive enhancers have been widely and increasingly used by healthy individuals who seek improvements in cognitive performance despite having no pathologies. One drug used for this purpose is methylphenidate, a first-line drug for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Objective: The aim of the present study was to test the effect of acute administration of varying doses of methylphenidate (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg and placebo) on a wide range of cognitive functions in healthy young people. Methods: A total of 36 young university students and graduates participated in the study. The participants underwent tests of attention and of episodic, and working memory. Results: No differences in performance were observed on any of the tests. There was a dose-dependent (40 mg > placebo) effect on self-reported wellbeing. Conclusions: According to the recent literature, psychostimulant medications, such as methylphenidate, improve performance when cognitive processes are below an optimal level, which was not the case for the subjects of the present study. We suggest the impression that methylphenidate enhances cognitive performance in healthy young people, justifying its use, may be due to improvements in subjective wellbeing promoted by the drug.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1002009

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six prior studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication, including no improvements for working memory, response inhibition, vigilance, cognitive processing speed, planning, set-shifting, interference control, and distraction suppression.

    “Six studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication.”

    From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as Batistela et al., 2016

    The Discussion reports no effect of methylphenidate on cognitive functioning in this study of healthy young people, and it describes another study with no improvement in attention or working memory. It does not establish the citing sentence’s count of six studies; it also reports improvements in visuo-spatial memory and planning in one prior study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies examining the effects of stimulant medication using neuropsychological measures have also used this waiting period length.

    “Other studies examining the effects of stimulant medication using neuropsychological measures have also used this waiting period length (e.g., Batistela et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Maslen H Faulmüller N Savulescu J Pharmacological cognitive enhancement-how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate Front Syst Neurosci 2014 8 107 1 12 24999320 PMC4052735
  2. [2]Sahakian B Morein-Zamir S Professor's little helper Nature 2007 450 1157 1159 18097378
  3. [3]Lanni C Lenzken SC Pascale A Del Vecchio I Racchi M Pistoia F Govoni S Cognition enhancers between treating and doping the mind Pharmacological Research 2008 57 196 213 18353672
  4. [4]Normann C Berger M Neuroenhancement status quo and perspectives Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008 258 Suppl 5 S110 S114 18985306
  5. [5]Repantis R Schlattmann P Laisney O Heuser I Modafinil and methylphenidate in healthy individuals A systematic review Pharmacol Res 2010 62 187 206 20416377
  6. [6]Finger G Silva EG Falavigna A Uso de metilfenidato entre estudantes de medicina revisão sistemática Rev Assoc Méd Bras 2013 59 3 285 289 23680277
  7. [8]Greely H Campbell P Sahakian B Harris J Kessler RC Gazzaniga M Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy Nature 2008 456 702 705 19060880
  8. [9]Mirko D Garasic MD Lavazza A Moral and social reasons to acknowledge the use of cognitive enhancers in competitive-selective contexts BMC Medical Ethics 2016 17 18 1 12 27025299 PMC4812634
  9. [10]Harris J Chatterjee A Is it acceptable for people to take methylphenidate to enhance performance BMJ 2009 338 1532 1533 19541706
  10. [11]Shook JR Galvagni L Giordano J Cognitive enhancement kept within contexts neuroethics and informed public policy Front SystNeurosci 2014 228 8 1 8 PMC4256981 25538573
  11. [12]Swanson JM Volkow ND Serum and brain concentrations of methylphenidate implications for use and abuse Neurosci Biobeha Rev 2003 27 615 621 14624806
  12. [14]Beyer C Staunton C Moodley K The implications of Methylphenidate use by healthy medical students and doctors in South Africa BMC Medical Ethics 2014 15 20 20 24592964 PMC3974029
  13. [16]Gorenstein C Andrade L Validation of a Portuguese version of the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in Brazilian subjects Braz J Med Biol Res 1996 29 4 453 457 8736107
  14. [18]Greenwood MH Lader MH Kantamaneni BD The acute effect of oral tryptophan in human subjects Br J Clin Pharmacol 1975 2 165 172 1234498 PMC1402514
  15. [20]Lezak MD Howieson DB Loring DW Neuropsychological Assessment 4 ed 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press
  16. [23]Jahanshahi M Saleem T Ho AK Dirnberger G Fuller R Random number generationas as in index of controlled processing Neuropsychology 2006 20 4 391 399 16846257
  17. [29]Linssen AMW Sambeth A Vuurman EFPM Riedel WJ Cognitive effects in healthy volunteers a review of single doses studies Int JNeuropsychopharmacol 2014 17 961 977 24423151
  18. [30]Turner DC Blackwell AD Dowson JH McLean A Sahakian BJ Neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate in adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder Psychopharmacology 2005 178 286 295 15338103
  19. [31]Mattay V Callicott J Bertolino A Heaton I Frank J Coppola R Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation Neuroimage 2000 12 268 275 10944409
  20. [34]Wetzel D Squire LR Janowsky DS Methylphenidate impairs learning and memory in normal adults Behav Neural Biol 1981 31 413 424 7259709
  21. [35]Brignell CM Rosenthal J Curran HV Pharmacological manipulations of arousal and memory for emotional material effects of a single dose of methylphenidate or lorazepam J Psychopharmacol 2007 21 7 673 683 17606475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batistela, S., Bueno, O. F. A., Vaz, L. J., & Galduróz, J. C. F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Dementia & Neuropsychologia
Published
2016-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
134-142
ISSN
1980-5764 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2467706629
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Dementia & Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
methylphenidate, nootropic drugs, psychostimulants, healthy young adults, attention, working memory, episodic memory, dose-dependent effects, subjective well-being, ADHD medication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review