The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture
Open accessAbstract
The authors exploit an unusual policy experiment to evaluate the effects of increased public access to information as a tool to reduce capture and corruption of public funds. In the late 1990s, the Ugandan government initiated a newspaper campaign to boost schools'and parents'ability to monitor local officials'handling of a large school-grant program. The results were striking: capture was reduced from 80 percent in 1995 to less than 20 percent in 2001. The authors use distance to the nearest newspaper outlet as an instrument for exposure to the campaign. Proximity to a newspaper outlet is positively correlated with the head teachers'knowledge about rules governing the grant program and the timing of releases of funds from the center, but uncorrelated with test scores of general ability. A strong (reduced-form) relationship exists between proximity to a newspaper outlet and reduction in capture of school funds since the newspaper campaign started. This pattern contrasts sharply with the outcomes in the five-year period prior to the campaign. Instrumenting for head teachers'knowledge about the grant program, the authors find that public access to information is a powerful deterrent to capture at the local level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/601447 · Cited by 2,038
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
Cited by
No Taxation without Information: Deterrence and Self-Enforcement in the Value Added Tax
Pomeranz, D. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20130393 · Cited by 822
Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?
Fox, J. A. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011 · Cited by 803
Björkman, M., & Svensson, J. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735 · Cited by 739
“…India; right to information on public works and public hearings or jan sunwais in Rajasthan, India; public information campaign to reduce capture of school funds in Uganda; and community scorecards in Malawi (see Reinikka and Svensson, 2004; World Bank, 2003; Paul, 2002; and Singh and Shah, 2002).”
Self-citationFighting Corruption to Improve Schooling: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign in Uganda
Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2005) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.259 · Cited by 719
Self-citationTransparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications
Kaufmann, D., & Bellver, A. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.808664 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J.
- Venue
- World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks
- Publisher
- World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- Published
- 2003-12
- OpenAlex
- W1501908285
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/1813-9450-3239
- The paper
- Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2003). The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.