Cited by 212Advanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic ModelingSemantic Web and Ontologies

TorusE: Knowledge Graph Embedding on a Lie Group

Open access
Ebisu, Takuma, Ichise, Ryutaro·2018·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Knowledge graphs are useful for many artificial intelligence (AI) tasks. However, knowledge graphs often have missing facts. To populate the graphs, knowledge graph embedding models have been developed. Knowledge graph embedding models map entities and relations in a knowledge graph to a vector space and predict unknown triples by scoring candidate triples. TransE is the first translation-based method and it is well known because of its simplicity and efficiency for knowledge graph completion. It employs the principle that the differences between entity embeddings represent their relations. The principle seems very simple, but it can effectively capture the rules of a knowledge graph. However, TransE has a problem with its regularization. TransE forces entity embeddings to be on a sphere in the embedding vector space. This regularization warps the embeddings and makes it difficult for them to fulfill the abovementioned principle. The regularization also affects adversely the accuracies of the link predictions. On the other hand, regularization is important because entity embeddings diverge by negative sampling without it. This paper proposes a novel embedding model, TorusE, to solve the regularization problem. The principle of TransE can be defined on any Lie group. A torus, which is one of the compact Lie groups, can be chosen for the embedding space to avoid regularization. To the best of our knowledge, TorusE is the first model that embeds objects on other than a real or complex vector space, and this paper is the first to formally discuss the problem of regularization of TransE. Our approach outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches such as TransE, DistMult and ComplEx on a standard link prediction task. We show that TorusE is scalable to large-size knowledge graphs and is faster than the original TransE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11538

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TorusE projects points into a torus to solve the regularization issue of TransE.

    “TorusE [13] was motivated by the observation that the regularization used in TransE forces entity embeddings to lie on a hypersphere, thus limiting their capability to satisfy the translational constraint. To solve this problem, TorusE projects each point 𝒙 of the traditional open manifold R 𝑑 into a [ 𝒙 ] point on a torus T 𝑑 .”

    From Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Angeli, G.; Premkumar, M. J. J.; and Manning, C. D. 2015. Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 344-354.
  2. Auer, S.; Bizer, C.; Kobilarov, G.; Lehmann, J.; Cyganiak, R.; and Ives, Z. G. 2007. DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In The Semantic Web, 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference , 722735.
  3. Bollacker, K.; Evans, C.; Paritosh, P.; Sturge, T.; and Taylor, J. 2008. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data , 1247-1250.
  4. Bordes, A.; Usunier, N.; Garc´ ıa-Dur´ an, A.; Weston, J.; and Yakhnenko, O. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2787-2795.
  5. Dong, X.; Gabrilovich, E.; Heitz, G.; Horn, W.; Lao, N.; Murphy, K.; Strohmann, T.; Sun, S.; and Zhang, W. 2014. Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In Proceedings of The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 601-610.
  6. Ebisu, T., and Ichise, R. 2017. Triple prediction from texts by using distributed representations of words. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems Vol.E100-D(12):30013009.
  7. Fader, A.; Soderland, S.; and Etzioni, O. 2011. Identifying relations for open information extraction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 1535-1545.
  8. Lin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Luan, H.; Sun, M.; Rao, S.; and Liu, S. 2015a. Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 705-714.
  9. Lin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Sun, M.; Liu, Y .; and Zhu, X. 2015b. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2181-2187.
  10. Mausam; Schmitz, M.; Bart, R.; Soderland, S.; and Etzioni, O. 2012. Open language learning for information extraction. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning , 523-534.
  11. Mikolov, T.; Sutskever, I.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G. S.; and Dean, J. 2013b. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 3111-3119.
  12. Miller, G. A. 1995. Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11):39-41.
  13. Nickel, M.; Rosasco, L.; and Poggio, T. A. 2016. Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 1955-1961.
  14. Nickel, M.; Tresp, V.; and Kriegel, H. 2011. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning , 809-816.
  15. Socher, R.; Chen, D.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. Y. 2013. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 926-934.
  16. Suchanek, F. M.; Kasneci, G.; and Weikum, G. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web , 697-706.
  17. Trouillon, T.; Dance, C. R.; Welbl, J.; Riedel, S.; Gaussier, ´ E.; and Bouchard, G. 2017. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization. CoRR abs / 1702.06879.
  18. Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Feng, J.; and Chen, Z. 2014. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 1112-1119.
  19. Xiao, H.; Huang, M.; and Zhu, X. 2016. TransG : A generative model for knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics .
  20. Yang, B.; Yih, W.; He, X.; Gao, J.; and Deng, L. 2014. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. CoRR abs / 1412.6575.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebisu, T., & Ichise, R.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
  • National Institute of Informatics (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2018-04-25
Volume
32
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2963203544
Cited by
212
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
knowledge graph embedding, Lie groups, TransE, regularization, link prediction, compact Lie groups, knowledge graph completion, negative sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review