The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Tasks
Open accessAbstract
Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have found limited success beyond simulated applications, and one main reason is the absence of safety guarantees during the learning process. Real world systems would realistically fail or break before an optimal controller can be learned. To address this issue, we propose a controller architecture that combines (1) a model-free RL-based controller with (2) model-based controllers utilizing control barrier functions (CBFs) and (3) online learning of the unknown system dynamics, in order to ensure safety during learning. Our general framework leverages the success of RL algorithms to learn high-performance controllers, while the CBF-based controllers both guarantee safety and guide the learning process by constraining the set of explorable polices. We utilize Gaussian Processes (GPs) to model the system dynamics and its uncertainties. Our novel controller synthesis algorithm, RL-CBF, guarantees safety with high probability during the learning process, regardless of the RL algorithm used, and demonstrates greater policy exploration efficiency. We test our algorithm on (1) control of an inverted pendulum and (2) autonomous carfollowing with wireless vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and show that our algorithm attains much greater sample efficiency in learning than other state-of-the-art algorithms and maintains safety during the entire learning process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have been increasingly adopted by the robotics community over the past years to control complex robots or multi-robot systems [1], [2], or provide end-to-end policies from perception to control [3].”
From Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
(1995) · Cited by 10,558
Trust region policy optimization
Schulman, J., Levine, S., Moritz, P., Jordan, M. I., & Abbeel, P. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.05477 · Cited by 4,578 · cited 13×
“Furthermore, if we use TRPO for the RL algorithm, then the control law Proof.”
MethodInfluentialDeterministic Policy Gradient Algorithms
Silver, D., Lever, G., Heess, N., Degris, T., Wierstra, D., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · HAL · Cited by 3,275
Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems
Ames, A. D., Xu, X., Grizzle, J. W., & Paulo Tabuada, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2638961 · Cited by 2,920 · cited 1×
“The existence of a CBF implies that there exists a deterministic controller u CBF : S → A such that the set C is forward invariant for system (1) (Agrawal and Sreenath 2017; Ames et al. 2017).”
BackgroundApprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning
Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015430 · Cited by 2,855 · cited 1×
“Previous approaches to safe reinforcement learning include reward-shaping , policy optimization with constraints (Gaskett 2003; Moldovan and Abbeel 2012; Achiam et al. 2017; Wachi et al. 2018), or teacher advice (Abbeel and Ng 2004; Abbeel, Coates, and Ng 2010; Tang et al. 2010).”
Background(2015) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 1,119
Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control
Duan, Y., Chen, X., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.06778 · Cited by 1,114 · cited 1×
“This method has been successfully applied to continuous control tasks (Duan et al. 2016; Lillicrap et al. 2015) where controllers have learned to stabilize complex robots (after many policy iterations).”
MethodReinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients
Peters, J., & Schaal, S. (2008) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.02.003 · Cited by 831
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 603
Data-Driven Analysis for Disturbance Amplification in Car-Following Behavior of Automated VehiclesPreprint
Zhou, Y., Zhong, X., Chen, Q., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4213496 · Cited by 30
Safe Navigation in Human Occupied Environments Using Sampling and Control Barrier Functions
Majd, K., Yaghoubi, S., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2021) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636406 · Cited by 29
Safety of Dynamical Systems With Multiple Non-Convex Unsafe Sets Using Control Barrier Functions
Notomista, G., & Saveriano, M. (2021) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2021.3089097 · Cited by 29
“[4], navigation [5], [6], and autonomy [7], [8] have been extensively studied; safe reinforcement learning [9], [10] in”
BackgroundOnline Optimal Control with Affine Constraints
Li, Y., Das, S., & Li, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17035 · Cited by 29
“…and safe learning-based control that studies how to learn optimal policies without violating constraints and without knowing the system (Fisac et al. 2018; Aswani et al. 2013; Wabersich and Zeilinger 2018; Garcıa and Fernández 2015; Cheng et al. 2019; Zanon and Gros 2019; Fulton and Platzer 2018).”
BackgroundYu, P., Zhang, H., & Song, Y. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121396 · Cited by 29
Meng, Y., Li, Y., Fitzsimmons, M., et al. (2022) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110478 · Cited by 28
“tems received considerable attention, primarily motivated by safety-critical control applications, such as in autonomous cyber-physical systems and robotics [1,7,11,20,2,34].”
BackgroundA Fixed-Time Stable Adaptation Law for Safety-Critical Control under Parametric Uncertainty
Black, M., Arabi, E., & Panagou, D. (2021) · European Control Conference (ECC) · doi:10.23919/ecc54610.2021.9655080 · Cited by 28
“within a specified set, CBFs have proven to be effective both in correcting some potentially unsafe control action [3], [4] and as a constraint in optimization-based control [5], [6].”
BackgroundSafe Multiagent Motion Planning Under Uncertainty for Drones Using Filtered Reinforcement Learning
Safaoui, S., Vinod, A. P., Chakrabarty, A., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2024.3387010 · Cited by 27
“[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].”
BackgroundLearning Control Barrier Functions with High Relative Degree for Safety-Critical Control
Wang, C., Meng, Y., Li, Y., Smith, S. L., & Liu, J. (2021) · European Control Conference (ECC) · doi:10.23919/ecc54610.2021.9655206 · Cited by 26
“The authors in [7] also use Gaussian process to estimate the model but focusing on the safety during the training process.”
MethodReinforcement Learning for MPC: Fundamentals and Current Challenges
Kordabad, A. B., Reinhardt, D., Anand, A. S., et al. (2023) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.548 · Cited by 25
Learning Deep Neural Network Controllers for Dynamical Systems with Safety Guarantees: Invited Paper
Deshmukh, J. V., Kapinski, J. P., Yamaguchi, T., & Prokhorov, D. V. (2019) · doi:10.1109/iccad45719.2019.8942130 · Cited by 26
“For example in [5], [6], [9], the authors assume a Gaussian”
BackgroundModel-Free design of control systems over wireless fading channels
Lima, V., Eisen, M., Gatsis, K., et al. (2022) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108540 · Cited by 25
“That is different from the traditional view in areas such as safe reinforcement learning, where one typically wants to ensure that the agent does not visit unsafe regions during training [34].”
BackgroundRobust Model Predictive Control with Data-Driven Koopman Operators
Mamakoukas, G., Cairano, S. D., & Vinod, A. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc53348.2022.9867811 · Cited by 25
Evaluating Model-Free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-Critical Tasks
Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Li, S., Yuan, B., Wang, X., & Tao, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26786 · Cited by 36
Combining Control Barrier Functions and Behavior Trees for Multi-Agent Underwater Coverage Missions
Özkahraman, Ö., & Ögren, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9304151 · Cited by 25
Conservative and Adaptive Penalty for Model-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning
Ma, Y. J., Shen, A., Bastani, O., & Dinesh, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20478 · Cited by 24
“…class of approaches incorporates Lagrangian constraint regularization into the policy updates in policy-gradient algorithms (Achiam et al. 2017; Ray, Achiam, and Amodei 2019; Tessler, Mankowitz, and Mannor 2018; Dalal et al. 2018; Cheng et al. 2019; Zhang, Vuong, and Ross 2020; Chow et al. 2019).”
BackgroundRobust Sampling-Based Control of Mobile Manipulators for Interaction With Articulated Objects
Rizzi, G., Chung, J. J., Gawel, A., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3233343 · Cited by 24
“In [26], CBFs are instead used to guide the learning process.”
BackgroundKasaura, K., Miura, S., Kozuno, T., et al. (2023) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3284378 · Cited by 24
“Examples of algorithms that adopt this approach encompass differentiable optimization layers [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [11], Neural Frank-Wolfe Policy Optimization (NFWPO) [8], and α-projection [12].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLiu, P., Zhang, K., Tateo, D., Jauhri, S., Hu, Z., Peters, J., & Chalvatzaki, G. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161548 · Cited by 23
“approaches are based on either Lyapunov functions [7], [24], [25], Hamilton-Jacobi reachability [26], Control Barrier Functions [27], [28], constraint linearization [29], [30] or planning [31], [32].”
MethodSafe Control Against Uncertainty: A Comprehensive Review of Control Barrier Function Strategies
Wang, S., & Wen, S. (2025) · IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine · doi:10.1109/msmc.2024.3431789 · Cited by 23
Conflict-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Meta-Cognitive Learning Framework
Mazouchi, M., Nageshrao, S. P., & Modares, H. (2021) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2021.1004353 · Cited by 23
Reinforcement learning with guarantees: a review
Osinenko, P., Dobriborsci, D., & Aumer, W. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.619 · Cited by 26
Adaptive Safety with a RISE-Based Disturbance Observer
Isaly, A., Patil, O. S., Sweatland, H. M., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2024.3358210 · Cited by 22
“For example, the authors of [14] and [15] leverage GPs to obtain probabilistic safety guarantees, but use the standard deviation of the GP in a worst-case fashion.”
BackgroundComputationally Efficient Safe Reinforcement Learning for Power Systems
Tabas, D., & Zhang, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc53348.2022.9867652 · Cited by 22
Yao, Y., Ding, J., Zhao, C., et al. (2022) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105345 · Cited by 22
SRL-TR 2 : A Safe Reinforcement Learning Based TRajectory TRacker Framework
Wang, C., Wang, L., Lu, Z., Chu, X., Shi, Z., Deng, J., Su, T., Shou, G., & Wen, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3250720 · Cited by 23
“Inspired by [25], we propose the framework SRL-TR 2 , which utilizes an MPC controller to restrain the RL controller.”
MethodLearn Zero-Constraint-Violation Safe Policy in Model-Free Constrained Reinforcement Learning
Ma, H., Liu, C., Li, S. E., Zheng, S., Sun, W., & Chen, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3348422 · Cited by 26
“Nevertheless, it is difficult to find the safe projection, for example, projecting the output to a safe set on the action space [26], [53], [54], or adding a safe layer to the policy network [33].”
InfluentialProbabilistic Constraint for Safety-Critical Reinforcement Learning
Chen, W., Subramanian, D., & Paternain, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2024.3379246 · Cited by 22
“This makes them often not suitable for safety-critical applications [35], [36], [37].”
BackgroundLi, Z., Zhou, Y., Chen, D., et al. (2024) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104576 · Cited by 22
Safe Controller Synthesis for Data-Driven Differential Inclusions
Ahmadi, M., Israel, A., & Topcu, U. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2020.2969713 · Cited by 22
“Recently, it was demonstrated that control barrier functions can be used in reinforcement learning to ensure safety in continuous control tasks [25].”
BackgroundSafe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Action GovernorPreprint
Li, Y., Li, N., Tseng, H. E., Girard, A., Filev, D., & Kolmanovsky, I. V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.10643 · Cited by 22
“On the other hand, unlike safe RL approaches based on the use of control barrier functions (Cheng et al., 2019; Sloth et al., 2012), our RAG is formulated based on discrete-time models from the start and thereby can be more directly applied in a digital setting (e.”
BackgroundLearning Deep Energy Shaping Policies for Stability-Guaranteed Manipulation
Khader, S. A., Yin, H., Falco, P., & Kragic, D. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3111962 · Cited by 21
“Methods such as [3], [5], [4] require good nominal dynamics models and can only tolerate disturbances to some extent.”
BackgroundMethodLearning-Based Safe Control for Robot and Autonomous Vehicle Using Efficient Safety Certificate
Zheng, H., Chen, C., Li, S., et al. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2023.3280573 · Cited by 21
“…learning-based research can be divided into three main categories: (1) learning safe control policies with known feasible energy function [17], [18], [22]; (2) learning to synthesize energy functions with known dynamic models or controller [21], [23], [28], [29], [30]; and (3) joint synthesis…”
BackgroundZhang, Z.-L., Han, S., Wang, J., & Miao, F. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161216 · Cited by 21
Reinforcement Learning for Safe Robot Control using Control Lyapunov Barrier Functions
Du, D., Han, S., Qi, N., et al. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160991 · Cited by 21
“5 Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. controller [8], [10], [13], a model predictive control (MPC) controller [14], etc.”
BackgroundMethodSafe reinforcement learning for industrial optimal control: A case study from metallurgical industry
Jun, Z., Jia, R., Liu, S., et al. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119684 · Cited by 21
Episodic Koopman Learning of Nonlinear Robot Dynamics with Application to Fast Multirotor Landing
Folkestad, C., Pastor, D., & Burdick, J. W. (2020) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197510 · Cited by 21
Self-citationData-Efficient and Safe Learning for Humanoid Locomotion Aided by a Dynamic Balancing Model
Ahn, J., Lee, J., & Sentis, L. (2020) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2020.2990743 · Cited by 23
“For safe exploration in the learning process under uncertain dynamics, the work in [20] employed a Gaussian Process (GP) to approximate the unknown part of the dynamics from the dataset by learning a mean estimate μd(s) and an uncertainty σ(2)d(s) in tandem with the policy update with probability confidence intervals…”
MethodSafe Off-policy Reinforcement Learning Using Barrier Functions
Marvi, Z., & Kiumarsi, B. (2020) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147584 · Cited by 21
“…for complete knowledge of the system dynamics in the CBF approach and thus to partially bridge the gap between safety and learning-based control design, Gaussian process (GP) has been used in [7], [8] in which a nominal model is assumed to be known and the disturbances are learned by GP.”
Feasible Actor-Critic: Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Ensuring Statewise SafetyPreprint
Ma, H., Guan, Y., Li, S. E., Zhang, X., Zheng, S., & Chen, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.10682 · Cited by 44
“With these control-based approaches to compute a a safe set U at a specific state, some RL studies projects the policy output into U achieve safety of current state [7, 9].”
Auto-Scaling Containerized Applications in Geo-Distributed Clouds
Shi, T., Ma, H., Chen, G., & Hartmann, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2023.3317262 · Cited by 20
“The performance constraint of the LACS problem motivates us to adopt safe RL, which aims to learn a policy that maximizes the expected return while ensuring (or encouraging) the satisfaction of some safety constraints [25].”
BackgroundStable and Safe Reinforcement Learning via a Barrier-Lyapunov Actor-Critic Approach
Zhao, L., Gatsis, K., & Papachristodoulou, A. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc49753.2023.10383742 · Cited by 19
“Similar to [7], [8], we use a Gaussian process (GP) to estimate the unknown dynamics d from data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZhang, Y., Ge, S. S., Liang, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3355564 · Cited by 19
“Recently, the control barrier functions (CBFs) have raised great attention that can be suitably employed for the state-variables constraints formulation for optimization problems with known nominal model [13], [14], [15].”
Formal Verification for Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning in Trajectory Generation
Corsi, D., Marchesini, E., Farinelli, A., & Fiorini, P. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) · doi:10.1109/irc.2020.00062 · Cited by 19
“Typical Safe DRL approaches [13], [14] address the safety of the model introducing constraints in the training phase or well-defined reward functions, but they are not designed to formally guarantee the correct behavior of the network.”
Marvi, Z., & Kiumarsi, B. (2021) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2021.1004347 · Cited by 19
Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical ConstraintsPreprint
Hasanbeig, M., Abate, A., & Kroening, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.12156 · Cited by 38
“Recent approaches on this problem [8, 25, 27, 38, 41] are either computationally expensive or require explicit, strong assumptions about the model of agentenvironment interactions.”
BackgroundSafe Reinforcement Learning of Control-Affine Systems with Vertex NetworksPreprint
Zheng, L., Shi, Y., Ratliff, L. J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.09488 · Cited by 19
Samavi, S., Han, J. R., Shkurti, F., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2024.3484634 · Cited by 18
“…advancements, existing interactive solutions are not designed to satisfy explicit safety constraints, and either couple the often opposing objectives of safety and performance (e.g. in collision-avoiding RL [16]), or need to rely on post-processing to ensure safety (e.g. via safety filters [17]).”
BackgroundSystematic Design of Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functions Using Maximal Output Admissible Sets
Freire, V., & Nicotra, M. M. (2023) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2023.3282888 · Cited by 18
“Although DECBFs have been successfully implemented in discrete-time applications [12], [13], they suffer from similar drawbacks as continuous-time CBFs: finding a DECBF for arbitrary constraint sets is challenging, and resorting to candidate DECBFs can lead to infeasibility issues in the DECBF-based…”
BackgroundLin, K., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Li, D., Shi, X., & Chen, S. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120261 · Cited by 19
Constrained reinforcement learning with statewise projection: a control barrier function approach
Jin, X., Li, K., & Jia, Q. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3872-9 · Cited by 18
“Current efforts use it to design a modified controller for stability [26] or to enhance the efficiency of the learning process with Gaussian assumption [27].”
BackgroundNeural Control Barrier Functions for Safe Navigation
Harms, M., Kulkarni, M., Khedekar, N., Jacquet, M., & Alexis, K. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802694 · Cited by 18
“A first approach to mention is Safe RL, where a CBF is jointly learned during training to guide the policy to implicitly encode the underlying safety mechanism [22].”
Bayesian Safe Learning and Control with Sum-of-Squares Analysis and Polynomial Kernels
Devonport, A., Yin, H., & Arcak, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9304397 · Cited by 18
“The practice of collecting data from a dynamical system for a learning model while keeping the system safe is called safe learning, and has been investigated both from the perspective of both robust control [1], [2] and reinforcement learning [3]–[6].”
BackgroundShieldNN: A Provably Safe NN Filter for Unsafe NN Controllers
Ferlez, J., Elnaggar, M. M., Shoukry, Y., & Fleming, C. H. (2025) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc63710.2025.11107610 · Cited by 21
“Control Barrier Functions (CBF) [1] and the associated idea of controller shielding [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] have become important tools in the design of safety-critical control systems, especially those that incorporate learning-enabled components such as Neural Networks (NNs).”
Deep Constrained Q-learningPreprint
Kalweit, G., Hügle, M., Werling, M., & Boedecker, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.09398 · Cited by 32
“Robust control methods are able to model constraints on the short-term horizon and ensure their long-term satisfaction through constraints on terminal costs [26]–[28].”
BackgroundLuo, Y., & Ma, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01846 · Cited by 18
“Another line of work utilizes ideas from control theory and model-based approach [Cheng et al., 2019, Berkenkamp et al., 2017, Taylor et al., 2019, Zeng et al., 2020].”
MethodHou, Z., Liu, W., & Knoll, A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2024.3463468 · Cited by 17
“There has been rising interest in integrating CBF with RLtoguaranteesystemsafety[23],[24].”
Safe Reinforcement Learning for Urban Driving using Invariably Safe Braking Sets
Krasowski, H., Zhang, Y., & Althoff, M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc55140.2022.9922166 · Cited by 17
“For the first approach, usually, a penalty is given in case a correction is necessary [16], [17], [25], [26].”
BackgroundMethodSafe reinforcement learning under temporal logic with reward design and quantum action selection
Cai, M., Xiao, S., Li, J., & Kan, Z. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28582-4 · Cited by 17
“In other words, only the best action is selected when measuring this quantum state, as shown in Equation (28).”
BackgroundInfluentialData-Driven Safe Control of Uncertain Linear Systems Under Aleatory Uncertainty
Modares, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3267019 · Cited by 17
“CBF-based approaches have also been used to certify the safety of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].”
MethodSafety reinforcement learning control via transfer learning
Zhang, Q., Wu, C., Tian, H., et al. (2024) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111714 · Cited by 17
Niu, Z., & He, H. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123861 · Cited by 17
Off-Policy Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems
Jha, M., & Kiumarsi, B. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128677 · Cited by 16
Toward Scalable Multirobot Control: Fast Policy Learning in Distributed MPC
Zhang, X., Pan, W., Li, C., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2025.3531818 · Cited by 16
“Few works have been dedicated to the safe multiagent policy learning [31], [32], drawing inspiration from cost-shaping-based RL [27], [28].”
Li, M., Jie, Y., Kong, Y., & Cheng, H. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812163 · Cited by 16
“Moreover, the effects of action correction from the optimization module are nontrivial in RL as it may break the Markov assumption [12, 13].”
BackgroundYu, C., Ni, A., Luo, J., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Qin-qin, C., & Tu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1155/2022/8351543 · Cited by 16
“)is is just a soft constraint and cannot guarantee complete safety since RL is likely to take unsafe behaviors without a hard constraint [42].”
A hierarchical long short term safety framework for efficient robot manipulation under uncertainty
He, S., Zhao, W., Hu, C., et al. (2023) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102522 · Cited by 16
Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zou, W., Chen, J., Yin, Y., & Li, S. E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3336263 · Cited by 16
“The infeasible region of π is defined as The above-defined feasible regions are related to the concept of “safe set” in CBF literature [13], [14], [19], which is used to refer to the forward invariant set of CBF.”
BackgroundMethodBejarano, F. P., Brunke, L., & Schoellig, A. P. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3512374 · Cited by 24
“The absence of a model of the system also tends to limit the sample efficiency of these methods [3], [18].”
Zero-Shot Policy Transfer in Autonomous Racing: Reinforcement Learning vs Imitation Learning
Hamilton, N. P., Musau, P., Lopez, D. M., & Johnson, T. T. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA) · doi:10.1109/icaa52185.2022.00011 · Cited by 16
Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Wasserstein Distributionally Robust MPC and Chance Constraint
Kordabad, A. B., Wiśniewski, R., & Gros, S. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3228922 · Cited by 16
“A safe RL-CBF framework has been developed to guarantee safety and improve exploration in [28].”
MethodLearning Safe Neural Network Controllers with Barrier Certificates
Zhao, H., Zeng, X. L., Chen, T., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62822-2_11 · Cited by 16
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic ShieldsPreprint
Jansen, N., Könighofer, B., Junges, S., Serban, A. C., & Bloem, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06096 · Cited by 22
Lagrangian-based online safe reinforcement learning for state-constrained systems
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Bhasin, S. (2025) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112458 · Cited by 15
“Based on this mathematical formulation, some common approaches to ensuring safety for RL-based con-trol include - using control barrier functions (CBF) [7,8], model predictive control (MPC) [9,10,11], temporal logic (TL) specifications [12,13], and using Gaussian processes [14,15], to name a few.”
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Bhatti, U. A., & Huang, M. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031198 · Cited by 15
“[12] proposed that other types of utility, including risk, should be within certain given boundaries, taking such constraint-system states as fence functions and strategy space constraints or boundaries.”
BackgroundTAG: Teacher-Advice Mechanism With Gaussian Process for Reinforcement Learning
Lin, K., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, S., Liu, Q., Gao, J., Jin, Y., & Gong, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3262956 · Cited by 16
“Cheng et al. [40] proposed an end-to-end safe RL algorithm based on the teacher-advice framework, where a control barrier function (CBF) was used to build the teacher model.”
MethodSafe reinforcement learning for high-speed autonomous racing
Evans, B., Jordaan, H. W., & Engelbrecht, H. A. (2023) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.002 · Cited by 15
“Control barrier functions (CBFs) have been used to enforce safety limits within a safe set, rather than a static limit [31,32] .”
BackgroundOnline Shielding for Stochastic Systems
Könighofer, B., Rudolf, J., Palmisano, A., Tappler, M., & Bloem, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76384-8_15 · Cited by 15
“We refer to [8,14,17,16,18] for some interesting approaches.”
BackgroundGaussian Control Barrier Functions: Safe Learning and Control
Khan, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9303753 · Cited by 15
“An RL algorithm combined with CBF guarantees safety while learning the set of explorable policies as shown in [16].”
MethodShielded Reinforcement Learning for Hybrid Systems
Brorholt, A. H., Jensen, P. G., Larsen, K. G., Lorber, F., & Schilling, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46002-9_3 · Cited by 16
“Several works are based on barrier certificates and adversarial examples [14,38] or Lyapunov functions [25].”
Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning through Decentralized Multiple Control Barrier FunctionsPreprint
Cai, Z., Cao, H., Lu, W., Zhang, L., & Xiong, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.12553 · Cited by 34
“However, the major issue of these approaches is that safety is not guaranteed during initial learning interactions [12].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialControl Barrier Function Augmentation in Sampling-based Control Algorithm for Sample Efficiency
Tao, C., Kim, H., Yoon, H., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc53348.2022.9867832 · Cited by 14
“In [17], the author uses CBF to guide the reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to explore a safe policy set.”
MethodVerified Probabilistic Policies for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Bacci, E., & Parker, D. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06773-0_10 · Cited by 14
“As discussed above, other approaches to assuring safety in reinforcement learning include shielding [1,4,51,30,24] and constrained or safe RL [16,20,12,44,21,36,25,22].”
BackgroundLiu, S., Liu, L., & Yu, Z. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.10.058 · Cited by 14
Safe Reinforcement Learning via a Model-Free Safety Certifier
Modares, A., Sadati, N., Esmaeili, B., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3264815 · Cited by 14
“…optimization problem is typically solved under which the constraints act as a shield to certify the safety of the RL actions before being deployed [11]: where the constraint is a barrier certification constraint that guarantees invariance of the set described by C s = { x : h ( x ) ≥ 0 } .”
BackgroundBarrier Functions Inspired Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning
Nilaksh, N., Ranjan, A., Agrawal, S., Jain, A., Jagtap, P., & Kolathaya, S. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610391 · Cited by 21
“Safety : [23] introduces a framework that combines model-free reinforcement learning with model-based CBF controllers and learned system dynamics to ensure safety during exploration.”
MethodResultContinuous-Time Safe Learning with Temporal Logic Constraints in Adversarial Environments
Sun, C., & Vamvoudakis, K. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc45564.2020.9147939 · Cited by 14
“The authors in [11]–[13] exploited control barrier function (CBF) where neural networks (NN) and learning are used.”
BackgroundReinforced approximate robust nonlinear model predictive control
Karg, B., & Lucia, S. (2021) · International Conference on Process Control · doi:10.1109/pc52310.2021.9447448 · Cited by 14
Safety-Critical Control Synthesis for Unknown Sampled-Data Systems via Control Barrier Functions
Niu, L., Zhang, H., & Clark, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683019 · Cited by 14
“Recent works have demonstrated the success of CBF- and/or CLFbased method along with learning algorithms [10], [11], [16], [17].”
MethodWan, X., Sun, M., Chen, B., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25660 · Cited by 13
“Compared with the Lyapunov-based methods (Berkenkamp et al. 2017; Chow et al. 2018), barrier function-based approaches (Cheng et al. 2019) relax the condition to guarantee the forward invariant property in the safe set and significantly increase the feasibility.”
MethodSafety-Guaranteed Learning-Based Flocking Control Design
Liu, M., & Chen, Y. (2023) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2023.3347809 · Cited by 13
“A CBF-based guiding control with reinforcement learning, including DDPG and TRPO, was proposed to achieve safe and efficient learning [18].”
BackgroundMethodXu, J., Wang, J., Zhong, Y., Rao, J., & Wu, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3344883 · Cited by 13
“This approach has garnered widespread adoption in recent years [17], [18], [19], [20].”
BackgroundClosing the Loop on Runtime Monitors with Fallback-Safe MPC
Sinha, R., Schmerling, E., & Pavone, M. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc49753.2023.10383965 · Cited by 13
“Many such algorithms have been proposed in recent years, for example by using robust MPC [15], control barrier functions (CBFs) [16] and Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis [17], [18].”
BackgroundMethodHamilton-Jacobi Reachability in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Ganai, M., Gao, S., & Herbert, S. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems · doi:10.1109/ojcsys.2024.3449138 · Cited by 20
“This approach of using the backup safe policy to override the tasking-solving policy is known as the least restrictive control law or shielding in Alshiekh et al. [6], Fisac et al. [46] and also examined in Cheng et al. [28], Leung et al. [72].”
MethodSafe Reinforcement Learning for Event-Triggered Control of Automated Vehicles With Uncertainty
Hu, F., Fu, X., & Huang, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3533578 · Cited by 13
“CBFs have been used to develop a new kind of CBF-based SRL method to achieve vehicle speed control [33], trajectory tracking control [34] and platoon control [35], and have shown superiority with lower collision risks and faster training speed than traditional DRL-based methods [36].”
Aksaray, D., Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Asarkaya, A. S. (2021) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636598 · Cited by 13
Learning Observation-Based Certifiable Safe Policy for Decentralized Multi-Robot Navigation
Cui, Y., Lin, L., Huang, X., et al. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811950 · Cited by 13
“Therefore, these algorithms are usually used in specifically structured state-based problems or single-agent scenarios [18] [19].”
BackgroundMethodGuaranteed Performances for Learning-Based Control Systems Using Robust Control Theory
Németh, B., & Gáspár, P. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77939-9_4 · Cited by 13
Control Barrier Functions for Safe CPS Under Sensor Faults and Attacks
Clark, A., Li, Z., & Zhang, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc42340.2020.9303766 · Cited by 13
“CBFs for safe reinforcement learning were introduced in [35].”
BackgroundSafe control of nonlinear systems in LPV framework using model-based reinforcement learning
Bao, Y., & Velni, J. M. (2022) · International Journal of Control · doi:10.1080/00207179.2022.2029945 · Cited by 13
“…have been developed for safe RL, such as constrained RL (Yu et al., 2019), control barrier functions based compensating control with model-free RL (Cheng et al., 2019), using reachability analysis in (Akametalu et al., 2014) or Lyapunov stability verification in (Berkenkamp et al., 2017) to…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, R., Orosz, G., Murray, R. M., & Burdick, J. W.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 3387-3395
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2966735560
- Semantic Scholar
- adcd4bfd88213da0c33d3cb7057411dd15b72c7a
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 25.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.aaai.org/ (unspecified)
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Keywords
- safe reinforcement learning, control barrier functions, safety-critical control, continuous control, model-based control, policy exploration, sample efficiency, inverted pendulum, vehicle-to-vehicle communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review