Cited by 143Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Adaptive Quantitative Trading: An Imitative Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

Open access
Liu, Yang, Liu, Qi, Zhao, Hongke, Pan, Zhen, Liu, Chuanren·2020·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

In recent years, considerable efforts have been devoted to developing AI techniques for finance research and applications. For instance, AI techniques (e.g., machine learning) can help traders in quantitative trading (QT) by automating two tasks: market condition recognition and trading strategies execution. However, existing methods in QT face challenges such as representing noisy high-frequent financial data and finding the balance between exploration and exploitation of the trading agent with AI techniques. To address the challenges, we propose an adaptive trading model, namely iRDPG, to automatically develop QT strategies by an intelligent trading agent. Our model is enhanced by deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and imitation learning techniques. Specifically, considering the noisy financial data, we formulate the QT process as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP). Also, we introduce imitation learning to leverage classical trading strategies useful to balance between exploration and exploitation. For better simulation, we train our trading agent in the real financial market using minute-frequent data. Experimental results demonstrate that our model can extract robust market features and be adaptive in different markets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5587

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Magdon-Ismail, M., and Atiya, A. F. 2004. Maximum drawdown. Risk Magazine 17(10):99-102.
  2. Pruitt, G., and Hill, J. R. 2012. Building Winning Trading Systems with Tradestation,+ Website , volume 542. John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Liu, Q., Zhao, H., Pan, Z., & Liu, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
34
Issue
02
Pages
2128-2135
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2997874851
Cited by
141
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
FWCI
24.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61922073, 71790594, U1605251, 61672483)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
quantitative trading, deep reinforcement learning, imitation learning, partially observable Markov decision processes, exploration-exploitation balance, high-frequency financial data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review