Cited by 1Speech and Audio ProcessingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Harnessing GANs for Zero-Shot Learning of New Classes in Visual Speech Recognition

Open access
Kumar, Yaman, Sahrawat, Dhruva, Maheshwari, Shubham, Mahata, Debanjan, Stent, Amanda, Yin, Yifang, Ratn Shah, Rajiv, Zimmermann, Roger·2020·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Visual Speech Recognition (VSR) is the process of recognizing or interpreting speech by watching the lip movements of the speaker. Recent machine learning based approaches model VSR as a classification problem; however, the scarcity of training data leads to error-prone systems with very low accuracies in predicting unseen classes. To solve this problem, we present a novel approach to zero-shot learning by generating new classes using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and show how the addition of unseen class samples increases the accuracy of a VSR system by a significant margin of 27% and allows it to handle speaker-independent out-of-vocabulary phrases. We also show that our models are language agnostic and therefore capable of seamlessly generating, using English training data, videos for a new language (Hindi). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to show empirical evidence of the use of GANs for generating training samples of unseen classes in the domain of VSR, hence facilitating zero-shot learning. We make the added videos for new classes publicly available along with our code1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5649

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such methods tend to use generative adversarial network models to synthesize and reconstruct visual features of unseen classes, resulting in high accuracy classification and ensuring a balance between seen and unseen class labels.

    “Such methods tend to use GAN models to synthesize and reconstruct the visual features of the unseen classes, resulting in high accuracy classification and ensuring a balance between seen and unseen class labels [136, 137].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [Amplayo et al. 2018] Amplayo, R. K.; Kim, J.; Sung, S.; and Hwang, S.-w. 2018. Cold-start aware user and product attention for sentiment classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05507 . · arXiv
  2. [Chung et al. 2017] Chung, J. S.; Senior, A. W.; Vinyals, O.; and Zisserman, A. 2017. Lip reading sentences in the wild. In Proceedings of CVPR .
  3. [Goodfellow et al. 2014] Goodfellow, I.; Pouget-Abadie, J.; Mirza, M.; Xu, B.; Warde-Farley, D.; Ozair, S.; Courville, A.; and Bengio, Y. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2672-2680.
  4. [Kumar et al. 2018a] Kumar, Y.; Aggarwal, M.; Nawal, P.; Satoh, S.; Shah, R. R.; and Zimmermann, R. 2018a. Harnessing AI for speech reconstruction using multi-view silent video feed. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference .
  5. [Socher et al. 2013] Socher, R.; Ganjoo, M.; Manning, C. D.; and Ng, A. 2013. Zero-shot learning through cross-modal transfer. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 935-943.
  6. [Vinyals et al. 2016] Vinyals, O.; Blundell, C.; Lillicrap, T.; Wierstra, D.; et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 3630-3638.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, Y., Sahrawat, D., Maheshwari, S., Mahata, D., Stent, A., Yin, Y., Ratn Shah, R., & Zimmermann, R.
Affiliations
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Bloomberg (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
34
Issue
03
Pages
2645-2652
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2986416418
Cited by
1
References
33
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
visual speech recognition, zero-shot learning, generative adversarial networks, lip reading, speaker-independent recognition, Hindi speech recognition, synthetic training data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review