Cited by 343Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Dual-level Collaborative Transformer for Image Captioning

Open access
Luo, Yunpeng, Ji, Jiayi, Sun, Xiaoshuai, Cao, Liujuan, Wu, Yongjian, Huang, Feiyue, Lin, Chia-Wen, Ji, Rongrong·2021·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Descriptive region features extracted by object detection networks have played an important role in the recent advancements of image captioning. However, they are still criticized for the lack of contextual information and fine-grained details, which in contrast are the merits of traditional grid features. In this paper, we introduce a novel Dual-Level Collaborative Transformer (DLCT) network to realize the complementary advantages of the two features. Concretely, in DLCT, these two features are first processed by a novel Dual-way Self Attenion (DWSA) to mine their intrinsic properties, where a Comprehensive Relation Attention component is also introduced to embed the geometric information. In addition, we propose a Locality-Constrained Cross Attention module to address the semantic noises caused by the direct fusion of these two features, where a geometric alignment graph is constructed to accurately align and reinforce region and grid features. To validate our model, we conduct extensive experiments on the highly competitive MS-COCO dataset, and achieve new state-of-the-art performance on both local and online test sets, i.e., 133.8% CIDEr on Karpathy split and 135.4% CIDEr on the official split.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v35i3.16328

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Masked Language Modelling in the text domain has been applied to audio and image, e.g., Masked Acoustic Modelling and Masked Image Region Prediction.

    “For instance, Masked Language Modelling (MLM) in the text domain has been applied to audio and image, e.g., Masked Acoustic Modelling [180], [200], Masked Image Region Prediction [190]”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [190]

  • Down-stream task-agnostic pretraining is optional, not necessary, and down-stream task specific pretraining is widely studied.

    “In practices of multimodal Transformers, the aforementioned down-stream task -agnostic pretraining is optional, not necessary, and down-stream task specific pretraining is also widely studied [150], [190], [208], [211].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [190]

  • Murahari et al. present a visual dialogue oriented approach to leverage pretraining on general vision-language datasets.

    “Murahari et al. [190] present a visual dialogue oriented approach to leverage pretraining on general vision-language datasets.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [190]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Papineni, K.; Roukos, S.; Ward, T.; and Zhu, W.-J. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine trans- lation. In ACL, 311-318.
  2. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, Ł.; and Polosukhin, I. 2017. At- tention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 5998-6008.
  3. Yao, T.; Pan, Y.; Li, Y.; and Mei, T. 2018. Exploring visual relationship for image captioning. In ECCV, 684-699.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, Y., Ji, J., Sun, X., Cao, L., Wu, Y., Huang, F., Lin, C.-W., & Ji, R.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2021-05-18
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
2286-2293
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W3174377922
Cited by
343
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 12
FWCI
20.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62072387, 62025603, U1705262, 62072389, 61802324, No. 62025603, 61772443, 62002305, No.61702136, No. 62002305, No.61802324, 62072386, 61702136, No.U1705262)
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2019B1515120049, 2019B1515120049)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
image captioning, regional characteristics, grid features, cross-attention, feature fusion, contextual information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review