Cited by 1,092Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionTopic Modeling

Attention on Attention for Image Captioning

Open access
Huang, Lun, Wang, Wenmin, Chen, Jie, Wei, Xiao-Yong·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Attention mechanisms are widely used in current encoder/decoder frameworks of image captioning, where a weighted average on encoded vectors is generated at each time step to guide the caption decoding process. However, the decoder has little idea of whether or how well the attended vector and the given attention query are related, which could make the decoder give misled results. In this paper, we propose an Attention on Attention (AoA) module, which extends the conventional attention mechanisms to determine the relevance between attention results and queries. AoA first generates an information vector and an attention gate using the attention result and the current context, then adds another attention by applying element-wise multiplication to them and finally obtains the attended information, the expected useful knowledge. We apply AoA to both the encoder and the decoder of our image captioning model, which we name as AoA Network (AoANet). Experiments show that AoANet outperforms all previously published methods and achieves a new state-of-the-art performance of 129.8 CIDEr-D score on MS COCO Karpathy offline test split and 129.6 CIDEr-D (C40) score on the official online testing server. Code is available at https://github.com/husthuaan/AoANet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00473

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DropToken reduces training complexity via random dropping a portion of video and audio tokens from input sequence during training.

    “DropToken [174] reduces the training complexity via random dropping a portion of the video and audio tokens from input sequence during training.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [174]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Wang, W., Chen, J., & Wei, X.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
4633-4642
OpenAlex
W2986670728
Cited by
1,092
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 197 · 2023: 228 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 188 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
38.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U-1613209, 61972217, 61872256)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
image captioning, attention mechanism, attention gate, encoder-decoder architecture, MS COCO

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review