The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text
Open accessAbstract
The inherent nature of social media content poses serious challenges to practical applications of sentiment analysis. We present VADER, a simple rule-based model for general sentiment analysis, and compare its effectiveness to eleven typical state-of-practice benchmarks including LIWC, ANEW, the General Inquirer, SentiWordNet, and machine learning oriented techniques relying on Naive Bayes, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, we first construct and empirically validate a gold-standard list of lexical features (along with their associated sentiment intensity measures) which are specifically attuned to sentiment in microblog-like contexts. We then combine these lexical features with consideration for five general rules that embody grammatical and syntactical conventions for expressing and emphasizing sentiment intensity. Interestingly, using our parsimonious rule-based model to assess the sentiment of tweets, we find that VADER outperforms individual human raters (F1 Classification Accuracy = 0.96 and 0.84, respectively), and generalizes more favorably across contexts than any of our benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the VADER (Hutto and Gilbert, 2014) delivered the best results in the multi-class classification case.”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additional consistency checks were performed using the established VADER lexicon (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014), providing further assurance against algorithmic biases and misclassifications.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Comment-level sentiment is measured using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) [14], a rule-based sentiment analysis tool validated for social media text.”
From OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“VADER is chosen for its rule-based, deterministic character: the same text always produces the same score.”
From DMF: A Deterministic Memory Framework for Conversational AI Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Emotional valences, measured with tools such as the LIWC, VADER 51 LabMT, or NRC emotion lexicon were often associated with PTSD symptoms or severity.”
From Linguistic markers for identifying post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning (VADER) is a method that has provided promising results on Twitter data (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The VADER sentiment lexicon is composed of more than 7,000 items, along with their associated sentiment intensity measures, validated by humans and specifically adapted to sentiment in microblog-like contexts, such as Twitter (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We also conducted robustness checks with other sentiment classification tools95–98, which show broad agreement with the RoBERTa results (Supplementary Sections 5 and 6).”
From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [95]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Responses skew positive, with most students expressing net-positive sentiment about AI's effect on learning and a minority expressing negative sentiment.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Panel B shows that students who express more positive views about AI's effect on learning use AI somewhat more for academic work during the semester ( ˆ β = 0 . 107, p = 0 . 096).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A regression of AI use on the sentiment score yields a positive but statistically insignificant coefficient ( ˆ β = 0 . 041, p = 0 . 647).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Sentiment is weakly related to both measures.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016 · Cited by 3,995
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,307
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,647
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3]3. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0. In Proc. of LREC-10.
- [5]5. Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2012). SenticNet 2. In Proc. AAAI IFAI RSC-12.
- [6]6. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2010). SenticNet. In Proc. of AAAI SCK-10.
- [18]18. Kamps, J., Mokken, R. J., Marx, M., & de Rijke, M. (2004). Us- ing WordNet to measure semantic orientation. In Proc. LREC-04.
- [31]31. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and Fast -But is it Good?. In Proc. EMNLP-08.
- [33]33. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- [34]34. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Re- search. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- [36]36. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter:. In Proc. ICWSM-10.
- [38]38. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system…real-time Twitter sentiment analysis. ACL-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,026
Zubair, M., Ali, J., Alhussein, M. A., Hassan, S., Aurangzeb, K., & Umair, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367129 · Cited by 35
Franke, L., Liang, H., Farzanehpour, S., Brantly, A., Davis, J. C., & Brown, C. (2024) · International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/3674805.3686692 · Cited by 34
“To perform sentiment analysis, we use three state-of-the-art models: Liu-Hu [56], VADER [58], and SentiArt [63].”
Zhao, R., Romero, O. J., & Rudnicky, A. I. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3267851.3267880 · Cited by 35
Analyzing the Traits and Anomalies of Political Discussions on Reddit
Guimarães, A., Balalau, O., Terolli, E., & Weikum, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3222 · Cited by 35
Ziems, C., Vigfússon, Ý., & Morstatter, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7345 · Cited by 37
ScenarioSA: A Dyadic Conversational Database for Interactive Sentiment Analysis
Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Wang, P., Li, X., Rong, L., & Song, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2994147 · Cited by 35
Onyenwe, I., Nwagbo, S. N. C., Mbeledogu, N. N., & Onyedinma, E. (2020) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-020-00667-2 · Cited by 35
Discovering and Categorising Language Biases in Reddit
Ferrer, X., van Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., & Criado, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18048 · Cited by 36
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?
Jacobs, A. M., Herrmann, J. B., Lauer, G., Lüdtke, J., & Schroeder, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746 · Cited by 35
Declining well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic reveals US social inequities
Bathina, K. C., ten Thij, M., Valdez, D., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254114 · Cited by 35
A global-scale analysis of the sharing economy model – an AirBnB case study
Giovanni Quattrone, A., Kusek, N., & Capra, L. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00349-3 · Cited by 35
Pattnaik, N., Li, S., & Nurse, J. R. C. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.103008 · Cited by 42
de Andrade, C. M. V., Belém, F. M., da Cunha, W. L. M., França, C., Viegas, F. A. R., da Rocha, L. C. D., & Gonçalves, M. A. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103336 · Cited by 43
Weitzel, L., Prati, R. C., & Aguiar, R. F. (2016) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30319-2_3 · Cited by 40
Sentiment dynamics in social media news channels
Kumar, N., Nagalla, R., Marwah, T., & Singh, M. (2018) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2018.10.004 · Cited by 35
Low, D. M., Rumker, L., Talkar, T., Torous, J. B., Cecchi, G., & Ghosh, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xvwcy · Cited by 35
A bias-variance analysis of state-of-the-art random forest text classifiers
Salles, T., da Rocha, L. C. D., & Gonçalves, M. A. (2020) · Advances in Data Analysis and Classification · doi:10.1007/s11634-020-00409-4 · Cited by 34
Paul, S., & Das, S. (2022) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-06-2021-0307 · Cited by 34
Favourability towards natural gas relates to funding source of university energy centres
Almond, D. V., Du, X., & Papp, A. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01521-3 · Cited by 34
Sentiment analysis using fuzzy logic: A comprehensive literature review
Vashishtha, S., Gupta, V., & Mittal, M. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1509 · Cited by 34
George, O. A., & Ramos, C. M. Q. (2024) · International Journal of Spa and Wellness · doi:10.1080/24721735.2024.2352979 · Cited by 34
“The Vader algorithm (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014) was taken into consideration as a technique for sentiment analysis.”
Browne, T. O., Abedin, M., & Chowdhury, M. J. M. (2024) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-024-00868-2 · Cited by 34
Stance detection: a practical guide to classifying political beliefs in text
Burnham, M. (2024) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2024.35 · Cited by 44
Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Social Multimedia
You, Q. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2964284.2971475 · Cited by 34
Mansar, Y., Gatti, L., Ferradans, S., Guerini, M., & Staiano, J. (2017) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2138 · Cited by 34
Identification of Hate Speech in Social Media
Ruwandika, N. D. T., & Weerasinghe, A. R. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter.2018.8615517 · Cited by 34
Sentiment analysis: dynamic and temporal clustering of product reviews
AL-Sharuee, M. T., Liu, F., & Pratama, M. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01668-6 · Cited by 34
COVID-19 Pandemic: Identifying Key Issues Using Social Media and Natural Language Processing
Oyebode, O., Ndulue, C., Mulchandani, D., Suruliraj, B., Adib, A. A. Z., Orji, F. A., Milios, E., Matwin, S., & Orji, R. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-021-00111-w · Cited by 38
An Ensemble Method for Radicalization and Hate Speech Detection Online Empowered by Sentic Computing
Araque, Ó., & Iglesias, C. Á. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09845-6 · Cited by 34
Chan, C., Bajjalieh, J., Auvil, L. S., Weßler, H., Althaus, S. L., Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., & Jungblut, M. (2021) · Computational Communication Research · doi:10.5117/ccr2021.1.001.chan · Cited by 38
Dhakal, S., Zhang, L., & Lv, X. (2021) · Natural Hazards Review · doi:10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000512 · Cited by 34
TRANSFAKE: Multi-task Transformer for Multimodal Enhanced Fake News Detection
Jing, Q., Yao, D., Fan, X., Wang, B., Tan, H., Bu, X., & Bi, J. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533433 · Cited by 35
Muritala, B. A., Hernández‐Lara, A. B., Rebull, M. V. S., & Perera-Lluna, A. (2022) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100948 · Cited by 36
Ahmed, C., ElKorany, A., & Elsayed, E. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-022-00756-y · Cited by 41
Smart, B., Watt, J., Benedetti, S., Mitchell, L., & Roughan, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_3 · Cited by 42
Asadabadi, M. R., Saberi, M., Sadghiani, N. S., Zwikael, O., & Chang, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-03-2021-0143 · Cited by 33
Melchiorre, A. B., Penz, D., Ganhör, C., Lesota, O., Fragoso, V., Fritzl, F., Parada‐Cabaleiro, E., Schubert, F., & Schedl, M. (2023) · International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s13735-023-00275-8 · Cited by 33
Examining shifts in public discourse on electric mobility adoption through Twitter data
Balla, S. N., Pani, A., Sahu, P. K., & González-Feliu, J. (2023) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103843 · Cited by 41
A Practical Guide to Conversation Research: How to Study What People Say to Each Other
Yeomans, M., Boland, F. K., Collins, H. K., Abi-Esber, N., & Brooks, A. W. (2023) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459231183919 · Cited by 44
Suraworachet, W., Seon, J., & Cukurova, M. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636905 · Cited by 44
Yu, J. H., Chauhan, D., Iqbal, R. A., & Yeoh, E. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10425-2 · Cited by 43
“Using the Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) Hutto and Gilbert (2014) tool, we assessed the emotional valence of the literature.”
nBERT: Harnessing NLP for Emotion Recognition in Psychotherapy to Transform Mental Health Care
Rasool, A., Aslam, S., Hussain, N., Imtiaz, S., & Riaz, W. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16040301 · Cited by 34
DocETL: Agentic Query Rewriting and Evaluation for Complex Document Processing
Shankar, S., Chambers, T., Shah, T., Parameswaran, A., & Wu, E. (2025) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3746405.3746426 · Cited by 147
“…(1) Baseline : This pipeline includes a map operation to identify the event type and summary of the incident, a resolve operation to deduplicate event types (synthesized by DocETL, akin to the baseline in Section 5.1), and a reduce operation to summarize the incident summaries for each event type.”
InfluentialExploring characteristics of suspended users and network stability on Twitter
Wei, W., Joseph, K., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M. (2016) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0358-5 · Cited by 36
Results of the fifth edition of the BioASQ Challenge
Nentidis, A., Bougiatiotis, K., Krithara, A., Παλιούρας, Γ., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-2306 · Cited by 36
A Comparison of Dictionary Building Methods for Sentiment Analysis in Software Engineering Text
Islam, M. R., & Zibran, M. F. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2017.67 · Cited by 33
Becken, S., Connolly, R. M., Chen, J., & Stantić, B. (2019) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.05.001 · Cited by 34
News Recommender System Considering Temporal Dynamics and News Taxonomy
Raza, S., & Ding, C. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9005459 · Cited by 33
Combining textual features to detect cyberbullying in social media posts
Fortunatus, M., Anthony, P., & Charters, S. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.063 · Cited by 33
Condolence and Empathy in Online Communities
Zhou, N., & Jurgens, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.45 · Cited by 36
Analyzing Patient Stories on Social Media Using Text Analytics
Zakkar, M. A., & Lizotte, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-021-00097-5 · Cited by 33
Lawyers are Dishonest? Quantifying Representational Harms in Commonsense Knowledge Resources
Mehrabi, N., Zhou, P., Morstatter, F., Pujara, J., Ren, X., & Galstyan, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.410 · Cited by 35
The impact of COVID-19 on tourism: Analysis of online reviews in the airlines sector
Rita, P., Moro, S., & Cavalcanti, G. M. B. (2022) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102277 · Cited by 33
Emotional reactions to robot colleagues in a role-playing experiment
Savela, N., Oksanen, A., Pellert, M., & García, D. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102361 · Cited by 37
Box‐Steffensmeier, J. M., & Moses, L. M. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2898 · Cited by 33
Lexicon-Based Methods vs. BERT for Text Sentiment Analysis
Kotelnikova, A., Paschenko, D., Bochenina, K., & Котельников, Е. В. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16500-9_7 · Cited by 36
Comparative Analysis of Lexicon and Machine Learning Approach for Sentiment Analysis
Srivastava, R., Bharti, P. K., & Verma, P. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130312 · Cited by 33
Text-based automatic personality prediction: a bibliographic review
Feizi-Derakhshi, A.-R., Feizi‐Derakhshi, M., Ramezani, M., Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., Akan, T., Ranjbar-Khadivi, M., Zafarani-Moattar, E., & Jahanbakhsh-Nagadeh, Z. (2022) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-022-00178-4 · Cited by 38
The sentiment of a virtual rock concert
Slater, M., Cabriera, C., Şenel, G., Banakou, D., Beacco, A., Oliva, R., & Gallego, J. (2022) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-022-00685-9 · Cited by 35
The Perception of Health Professionals in Bangladesh toward the Digitalization of the Health Sector
Hossain, M. S., Syeed, M. M. M., Fatema, K., & Uddin, M. F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192013695 · Cited by 33
Srinivas, S., & Ramachandiran, S. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-05162-9 · Cited by 45
MiMuSA—mimicking human language understanding for fine-grained multi-class sentiment analysis
Wang, Z., Hu, Z., Ho, S.-B., Cambria, E., & Tan, A. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08576-z · Cited by 33
How New Ideas Diffuse in Science
Cheng, M., Smith, D. S., Ren, X., Cao, H., Smith, S., & McFarland, D. A. (2023) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224231166955 · Cited by 32
How to Make Influencer Advertising Engaging on Instagram: Emotional Storytelling in Sponsored Posts
Gross, J., Cui, Z., & von Wangenheim, F. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2023.2211579 · Cited by 52
Constance: modeling annotation contexts to improve stance classification
Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Hobbs, W., Lazer, D., & Tsur, O. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1116 · Cited by 33
MixedEmotions: An Open-Source Toolbox for Multimodal Emotion Analysis
Buitelaar, P., Wood, I. D., Negi, S., Arčan, M., McCrae, J. P., Abele, A., Robin, C., Andryushechkin, V., Ziad, H., Sagha, H., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2018.2798287 · Cited by 36
Cross-language sentiment analysis of European Twitter messages duringthe COVID-19 pandemicPreprint
Kruspe, A., Häberle, M., Kuhn, I., & Zhu, X. X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.12172 · Cited by 55
The language of opinion change on social media under the lens of communicative action
Monti, C., Aiello, L. M., De Francisci Morales, G., & Bonchi, F. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21720-4 · Cited by 32
SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational Systems
Dinan, E., Abercrombie, G., Bergman, A., Spruit, S., Hovy, D., Boureau, Y.-L., & Rieser, V. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.284 · Cited by 32
Lampropoulos, G., Ferdig, R. E., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4468181 · Cited by 33
(Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics
Jacobs, A. M. (2018) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.18002.jac · Cited by 34
Geoinformation Harvesting From Social Media Data: A community remote sensing approach
Zhu, X. X., Wang, Y., Kochupillai, M., Werner, M., Häberle, M., Hoffmann, E. J., Taubenböck, H., Tuia, D., Levering, A., Jacobs, N., et al. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2022.3219584 · Cited by 42
Characterizing and Predicting Social Correction on Twitter
Ma, Y., He, B., Subrahmanian, N., & Kumar, S. (2023) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3578503.3583610 · Cited by 34
Liu, J., Leu, J., & Holst, S. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1403 · Cited by 36
Gündüz, U., & Demirel, S. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-023-09745-x · Cited by 36
Mahmoudi, A., Jemielniak, D., & Ciechanowski, L. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3353692 · Cited by 32
Uncovering Concerns of Citizens Through Machine Learning and Social Network Sentiment Analysis
Kumi, S., Snow, C. C., Lomotey, R. K., & Deters, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3426329 · Cited by 32
Silver Lining in the Fake News Cloud: Can Large Language Models Help Detect Misinformation?
Kumar, R., Goddu, B., Saha, S., & Jatowt, A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3440248 · Cited by 32
“The next steps involve sentiment and emotion annotation using VADER [46] for sentiment analysis and DistilRoBERTa-base [47] for emotion detection.”
Sentiment Analysis of Economic Text: A Lexicon-based Approach
Barbaglia, L., Consoli, S., Manzan, S., Pezzoli, L. T., & Tosetti, E. (2022) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13264 · Cited by 33
“They then assign a sentiment score to each word based on the frequency of co-occurrence of the word and the sentiment categories (positive, neutral, and negative) of the sentences obtained using the Vader algorithm proposed by Hutto and Gilbert (2014).”
FEEL: Featured Event Embedding Learning
Lee, I.-T., & Goldwasser, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11936 · Cited by 32
WLV at SemEval-2018 Task 3: Dissecting Tweets in Search of Irony
Rohanian, O., Taslimipoor, S., Evans, R., & Mitkov, R. (2018) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1090 · Cited by 32
Fan, M., Wu, K., Zhao, J., Li, Y., Wei, W., & Truong, K. N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934797 · Cited by 32
Benefits and pitfalls of using tweets to assess destination sentiment
Becken, S., Alaei, A., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-09-2017-0090 · Cited by 32
Sanagar, S., & Gupta, D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3005242 · Cited by 32
Sentiment and Emotion in Social Media COVID-19 Conversations: SAB-LSTM Approach
Kumar, D. A., & Chinnalagu, A. (2020) · International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) · doi:10.1109/smart50582.2020.9337098 · Cited by 32
Yuan, F., Yang, Y., Li, Q., & Mostafavi, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3137651 · Cited by 32
Placebo Selection in Survey Experiments: An Agnostic Approach
Porter, E. V., & Velez, Y. R. (2021) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2021.16 · Cited by 31
Lu, X., Sun, L., Xie, Z., & Li, D. (2022) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/25697 · Cited by 36
Yoon, S.-H., Park, G.-Y., & Kim, H. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102067 · Cited by 32
Mariani, M. M., Borghi, M., & Laker, B. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122296 · Cited by 39
Predicting math performance using natural language processing tools
Crossley, S. A., Liu, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2017) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3027385.3027399 · Cited by 32
A Socio-linguistic Model for Cyberbullying Detection
Tomkins, S., Getoor, L. C., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508294 · Cited by 33
A Multi-task Ensemble Framework for Emotion, Sentiment and Intensity PredictionPreprint
Akhtar, M. S., Ghosal, D., Ekbal, A., Bhattacharyya, P., & Kurohashi, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.01216 · Cited by 37
Dahooie, J. H., Raafat, R., Qorbani, A. R., & Daim, T. U. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3326663 · Cited by 32
Funkhouser, C. J., Trivedi, E., Li, L. Y., Helgren, F., Zhang, E., Sritharan, A., Cherner, R., Pagliaccio, D., Durham, K., Kyler, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13931 · Cited by 32
Twitter users perceptions of AI-based e-learning technologies
Stracqualursi, L., & Agati, P. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56284-y · Cited by 46
Xu, Z., Fang, Q., Huang, Y., & Xie, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302502 · Cited by 40
Han, P., Chen, H., Rasool, A., Jiang, Q., & Yang, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125515 · Cited by 31
Seabe, P. L., Moutsinga, C. R. B., & Pindza, E. (2025) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-025-01463-6 · Cited by 38
“Sentiment polarity was computed using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER), a lexicon-based algorithm designed specifically for analyzing informal text and social media, including cryptocurrency-related discussions (Hutto and Gilbert 2014b).”
InfluentialSteering the Craft: UI Elements and Visualizations for Supporting Progressive Visual Analytics
Badam, S. K., Elmqvist, N., & Fekete, J. (2017) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.13205 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 216-225
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2099813784
- Semantic Scholar
- bcdc102c04fb0e7d4652e8bcc7edd2983bb9576d
- Cited by
- 6,087
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 676 · 2025: 846 · 2024: 877 · 2023: 885 · 2022: 731 · 2021: 714 · 2020: 526 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 245 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 50.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, VADER, rule-based sentiment analysis, social media text, tweets, lexical features, sentiment intensity, microblogging, human raters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
