The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text
Open accessAbstract
The inherent nature of social media content poses serious challenges to practical applications of sentiment analysis. We present VADER, a simple rule-based model for general sentiment analysis, and compare its effectiveness to eleven typical state-of-practice benchmarks including LIWC, ANEW, the General Inquirer, SentiWordNet, and machine learning oriented techniques relying on Naive Bayes, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, we first construct and empirically validate a gold-standard list of lexical features (along with their associated sentiment intensity measures) which are specifically attuned to sentiment in microblog-like contexts. We then combine these lexical features with consideration for five general rules that embody grammatical and syntactical conventions for expressing and emphasizing sentiment intensity. Interestingly, using our parsimonious rule-based model to assess the sentiment of tweets, we find that VADER outperforms individual human raters (F1 Classification Accuracy = 0.96 and 0.84, respectively), and generalizes more favorably across contexts than any of our benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the VADER (Hutto and Gilbert, 2014) delivered the best results in the multi-class classification case.”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additional consistency checks were performed using the established VADER lexicon (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014), providing further assurance against algorithmic biases and misclassifications.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Comment-level sentiment is measured using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) [14], a rule-based sentiment analysis tool validated for social media text.”
From OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“VADER is chosen for its rule-based, deterministic character: the same text always produces the same score.”
From DMF: A Deterministic Memory Framework for Conversational AI Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Emotional valences, measured with tools such as the LIWC, VADER 51 LabMT, or NRC emotion lexicon were often associated with PTSD symptoms or severity.”
From Linguistic markers for identifying post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning (VADER) is a method that has provided promising results on Twitter data (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The VADER sentiment lexicon is composed of more than 7,000 items, along with their associated sentiment intensity measures, validated by humans and specifically adapted to sentiment in microblog-like contexts, such as Twitter (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We also conducted robustness checks with other sentiment classification tools95–98, which show broad agreement with the RoBERTa results (Supplementary Sections 5 and 6).”
From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [95]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Responses skew positive, with most students expressing net-positive sentiment about AI's effect on learning and a minority expressing negative sentiment.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Panel B shows that students who express more positive views about AI's effect on learning use AI somewhat more for academic work during the semester ( ˆ β = 0 . 107, p = 0 . 096).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A regression of AI use on the sentiment score yields a positive but statistically insignificant coefficient ( ˆ β = 0 . 041, p = 0 . 647).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Sentiment is weakly related to both measures.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016 · Cited by 3,995
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,307
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,647
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3]3. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0. In Proc. of LREC-10.
- [5]5. Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2012). SenticNet 2. In Proc. AAAI IFAI RSC-12.
- [6]6. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2010). SenticNet. In Proc. of AAAI SCK-10.
- [18]18. Kamps, J., Mokken, R. J., Marx, M., & de Rijke, M. (2004). Us- ing WordNet to measure semantic orientation. In Proc. LREC-04.
- [31]31. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and Fast -But is it Good?. In Proc. EMNLP-08.
- [33]33. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- [34]34. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Re- search. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- [36]36. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter:. In Proc. ICWSM-10.
- [38]38. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system…real-time Twitter sentiment analysis. ACL-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,026
CoAID: COVID-19 Healthcare Misinformation DatasetPreprint
Cui, L., & Lee, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00885 · Cited by 252
Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systems
Henderson, P., Sinha, K., Gontier, N., Ke, N. R., Fried, G., Lowe, R., & Pineau, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278777 · Cited by 166
An Army of Me: Sockpuppets in Online Discussion Communities
Kumar, S., Cheng, J., Leskovec, J., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052677 · Cited by 178
From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science
Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., List, J., Puryear, C., Drabble, R., & Lindquist, K. A. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211004899 · Cited by 203
Understanding cultural differences and extreme attitudes in the 2021 OECD Trust Survey
Smid, S. (2023) · OECD working papers on public governance · doi:10.1787/ef25d883-en · Cited by 166
Election result prediction using Twitter sentiment analysis
Ramteke, J., Shah, S. P., Godhia, D., & Shaikh, A. (2016) · International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1109/inventive.2016.7823280 · Cited by 165
Temperature and temperament: Evidence from Twitter
Baylis, P. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104161 · Cited by 169
ArtEmis: Affective Language for Visual Art
Achlioptas, P., Ovsjanikov, M., Haydarov, K., Elhoseiny, M., & Guibas, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01140 · Cited by 161
Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook
She, C., & Michelon, G. (2018) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2018.09.004 · Cited by 160
Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion
Crossley, S. A., Paquette, L., Dascălu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Baker, R. S. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2883851.2883931 · Cited by 166
SemEval-2017 Task 5: Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis on Financial Microblogs and News
Cortis, K., Freitas, A., Daudert, T., Huerlimann, M., Zarrouk, M., Handschuh, S., & Davis, B. (2017) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2089 · Cited by 159
Przegalińska, A., Triantoro, T., Kovbasiuk, A., Ciechanowski, L., Freeman, R. B., & Sowa, K. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102853 · Cited by 223
A comparative assessment of sentiment analysis and star ratings for consumer reviews
Al‐Natour, S., & Turetken, O. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102132 · Cited by 158
Using a stacked residual LSTM model for sentiment intensity prediction
Wang, J., Peng, B., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.049 · Cited by 158
A deep neural network based multi-task learning approach to hate speech detection
Kapil, P., & Ekbal, A. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106458 · Cited by 166
Leveraging Twitter data to understand public sentiment for the COVID‐19 outbreak in Singapore
Ridhwan, K. M., & Hargreaves, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100021 · Cited by 160
Towards Interpretable Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models
Yang, K., Ji, S., Zhang, T., Xie, Q., Kuang, Z., & Ananiadou, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.370 · Cited by 155
Twitter Sentiment Analysis via Bi-sense Emoji Embedding and Attention-based LSTM
Chen, Y., Yuan, J., You, Q., & Luo, J. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3240508.3240533 · Cited by 166
Khoo, L. S., McNaney, R., Lim, M. K., & McNaney, R. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24020348 · Cited by 194
Fusion of EEG response and sentiment analysis of products review to predict customer satisfaction
Kumar, S., Yadava, M., & Roy, P. P. (2018) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.001 · Cited by 158
An Effective BERT-Based Pipeline for Twitter Sentiment Analysis: A Case Study in Italian
Pota, M., Ventura, M., Catelli, R., & Esposito, M. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21010133 · Cited by 169
Hu, T., Wang, S., Luo, W. P., Zhang, M., Huang, X., Yan, Y., Liu, R., Ly, K., Kacker, V., She, B., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30854 · Cited by 150
Tourism demand forecasting using tourist-generated online review data
Hu, M., Li, H., Song, H., Li, X., & Law, R. (2022) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104490 · Cited by 157
AI feel you: customer experience assessment via chatbot interviews
Sidaoui, K., Jaakkola, M., & Burton, J. (2020) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2019-0341 · Cited by 170
“How was your meal?” Examining customer experience using Google maps reviews
Mathayomchan, B., & Taecharungroj, V. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102641 · Cited by 151
A semantic similarity-based perspective of affect lexicons for sentiment analysis
Araque, Ó., Zhu, G., & Iglesias, C. Á. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.005 · Cited by 155
Cotfas, L., Delcea, C., Roxin, I., Ioanăş, C., Gherai, D. S., & Tajariol, F. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3059821 · Cited by 149
Understanding service attributes of robot hotels: A sentiment analysis of customer online reviews
Luo, J. M., Vu, H. Q., Li, G., & Law, R. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103032 · Cited by 162
Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment
Hangartner, D., Gennaro, G., Alasiri, S., Bahrich, N., Bornhoft, A., Boucher, J., Demirci, B. B., Derksen, L., Hall, A., Jochum, M., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116310118 · Cited by 144
SentiCR: A customized sentiment analysis tool for code review interactions
Ahmed, T., Bosu, A., Iqbal, A., & Rahimi, S. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase.2017.8115623 · Cited by 150
Comparing pre-trained language models for Spanish hate speech detection
Plaza-del-Arco, F. M., Molina-González, M. D., López, L. A. U., & Valdivia, M. T. M. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114120 · Cited by 162
Senti-N-Gram: An n-gram lexicon for sentiment analysis
Dey, A., Jenamani, M., & Thakkar, J. J. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.004 · Cited by 142
The Interplay Between Online Reviews and Physician Demand: An Empirical Investigation
Xu, Y., Armony, M., & Ghose, A. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3879 · Cited by 142
Cookson, J., Lu, R.-J., Mullins, W., & Niessner, M. (2024) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103870 · Cited by 60
Extracting brand information from social networks: Integrating image, text, and social tagging data
Klostermann, J., Plumeyer, A., Böger, D., & Decker, R. (2018) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.08.002 · Cited by 152
Fuzzy logic applied to opinion mining: A review
Serrano-Guerrero, J., Romero, F. P., & Olivas, J. A. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107018 · Cited by 141
Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science
Feuerriegel, S., Maarouf, A., Bär, D., Geissler, D., Schweisthal, J., Pröllochs, N., Robertson, C. E., Rathje, S., Hartmann, J., Mohammad, S. M., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z · Cited by 140
ECONOMETRICS MEETS SENTIMENT: AN OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS
Algaba, A., Ardia, D., Bluteau, K., Borms, S., & Boudt, K. (2020) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12370 · Cited by 141
Financial Incentives Dampen Altruism in Online Prosocial Contributions: A Study of Online Reviews
Qiao, D., Lee, S., Whinston, A. B., & Wei, Q. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0949 · Cited by 150
Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API
Pfeffer, J., Mayer, K., & Morstatter, F. (2018) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0178-0 · Cited by 135
Towards trustworthy LLMs: a review on debiasing and dehallucinating in large language models
Lin, Z., Guan, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10896-y · Cited by 141
Addressing age-related bias in sentiment analysis,
Diaz, M., Johnson, I., Lazar, A., Piper, A. M., & Gergle, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173986 · Cited by 138
How Readability Shapes Social Media Engagement
Pancer, E., Chandler, V., Poole, M., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1073 · Cited by 149
SAME: Sentiment-Aware Multi-Modal Embedding for Detecting Fake News
Cui, L.-M., Wang, S., & Lee, D. (2019) · International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1145/3341161.3342894 · Cited by 142
A systematic review of digital transformation technologies in museum exhibition
Li, J., Zheng, X., Watanabe, I., & Ochiai, Y. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108407 · Cited by 136
A comparative study of machine translation for multilingual sentence-level sentiment analysis
Araújo, M., Pereira, A. C. M., & Benevenuto, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.031 · Cited by 136
Investigating COVID-19 News Across Four Nations: A Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Approach
Ghasiya, P., & Okamura, K. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3062875 · Cited by 143
Lexicon-Based vs. Bert-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study in Italian
Catelli, R., Pelosi, S., & Esposito, M. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11030374 · Cited by 153
Islam, M. S., Kabir, M. N., Ghani, N. A., Zamli, K. Z., Zulkifli, N. S. A., Rahman, M. M., & Moni, M. A. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10651-9 · Cited by 194
Irony detection via sentiment-based transfer learning
Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Chan, J., & Rosso, P. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.04.006 · Cited by 139
Ginger Cannot Cure Cancer: Battling Fake Health News with a Comprehensive Data Repository
Dai, E., Sun, Y., & Wang, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7350 · Cited by 140
YouTube marketing: how marketers' video optimization practices influence video views
Tafesse, W. (2020) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-10-2019-0406 · Cited by 148
Sentiment Analysis for Software Engineering: How Far Can Pre-trained Transformer Models Go?
Zhang, T., Xu, B., Thung, F., Haryono, S. A., Lo, D., & Jiang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) · doi:10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00017 · Cited by 129
Consensus vote models for detecting and filtering neutrality in sentiment analysis
Valdivia, A., Luzón, M. V., Cambria, E., & Herrera, F. (2018) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.03.007 · Cited by 130
Sadiq, S., Umer, M., Ullah, S., Mirjalili, S., Rupapara, V., & Nappi, M. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115111 · Cited by 143
Making Text Count: Economic Forecasting Using Newspaper Text
Kalamara, E., Turrell, A., Redl, C., Kapetanios, G., & Kapadia, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2907 · Cited by 140
Individuals with depression express more distorted thinking on social media
Bathina, K. C., ten Thij, M., Lorenzo‐Luaces, L., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01050-7 · Cited by 146
Sentiment analysis and topic modeling for COVID-19 vaccine discussions
Yin, H., Song, X., Yang, S., & Li, J. (2022) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-022-01029-y · Cited by 125
Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challenges
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.330 · Cited by 131
Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements
Shu, K., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2020) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_1 · Cited by 149
Thinking Skills Don’t Protect Service Workers from Replacement by Artificial Intelligence
Vorobeva, D., Fassi, Y. E., Pinto, D. C., Hildebrand, D. F. N., Herter, M. M., & Mattila, A. S. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221104312 · Cited by 136
All-in-One: Emotion, Sentiment and Intensity Prediction Using a Multi-Task Ensemble Framework
Akhtar, M. S., Ghosal, D., Ekbal, A., Bhattacharyya, P., & Kurohashi, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2019.2926724 · Cited by 124
Quantifying Online News Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Text Mining Study and Resource
Krawczyk, K., Chełkowski, T., Mishra, S., Xifara, D., Gibert, B., Laydon, D. J., Flaxman, S. R., Mellan, T. A., Schwämmle, V., Röttger, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28253 · Cited by 135
Islam, S., & Zibran, M. F. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.030 · Cited by 121
Social and geographical disparities in Twitter use during Hurricane Harvey
Zou, L., Lam, N., Shams, S., Cai, H., Meyer, M. A., Yang, S., Lee, K., Park, S., & Reams, M. A. (2018) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1545878 · Cited by 119
Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Models
Cheng, M., Durmus, E., & Jurafsky, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.84 · Cited by 235
A Multilayer Perceptron based Ensemble Technique for Fine-grained Financial Sentiment Analysis
Akhtar, M. S., Abhishek, K., Ghosal, D., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1057 · Cited by 123
Aldous, K. K., An, J., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3208 · Cited by 118
CNN-based multivariate data analysis for bitcoin trend prediction
Cavalli, S., & Amoretti, M. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107065 · Cited by 123
Explainable artificial intelligence for education and training
Fiok, K., Farahani, F. V., Karwowski, W., & Ahram, T. (2021) · The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology · doi:10.1177/15485129211028651 · Cited by 137
Schöne, J. P., Parkinson, B., & Goldenberg, A. (2021) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7 · Cited by 127
Using ChatGPT for human–computer interaction research: a primer
Tabone, W., & de Winter, J. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.231053 · Cited by 140
Survey on bimodal speech emotion recognition from acoustic and linguistic information fusion
Atmaja, B. T., Sasou, A., & Akagi, M. (2022) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2022.03.002 · Cited by 124
Laban, G., Kappas, A., Morrison, V., & Cross, E. S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01076-z · Cited by 119
Wang, Q., Saha, K., Gregori, E., Joyner, D., & Goel, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445645 · Cited by 120
Multilingual evaluation of pre-processing for BERT-based sentiment analysis of tweets
Pota, M., Ventura, M., Fujita, H., & Esposito, M. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115119 · Cited by 123
Garrido-Muñoz, I., Montejo-Ráez, A., Martínez-Santiago, F., & Ureña-López, L. A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11073184 · Cited by 123
Mariani, M. M., & Borghi, M. (2023) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2160027 · Cited by 157
Joung, J., & Kim, H. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102641 · Cited by 127
Sasangohar, F., Dhala, A. F., Zheng, F., Ahmadi, N., Kash, B. A., & Masud, F. N. (2020) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011604 · Cited by 119
Raghu Raman, R., Sairam, B. C. S. C., Veena, G., Vachharajani, H., & Nedungadi, P. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10581-5 · Cited by 112
Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data
Alam, K. N., Khan, M. S., Dhruba, A. R., Khan, M. M., Al‐Amri, J. F., Masud, M., & Rawashdeh, M. (2021) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2021/4321131 · Cited by 121
RetractedMukhtar, N., Khan, M. A., & Chiragh, N. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.08.003 · Cited by 111
Brindley, P., Cameron, R. W. F., TONYALOĞLU, E. E., Jørgensen, A., & Maheswaran, R. (2019) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.015 · Cited by 115
Sentiment Lexicon Expansion using Word2vec and fastText for Sentiment Prediction in Tamil texts
Thavareesan, S., & Mahesan, S. (2020) · Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) · doi:10.1109/mercon50084.2020.9185369 · Cited by 111
Schedl, M., Knees, P., McFee, B., Bogdanov, D., & Kaminskas, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_13 · Cited by 114
Becken, S., Stantić, B., Chen, J., Alaei, A., & Connolly, R. M. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.007 · Cited by 110
From conflicts and confusion to doubts: Examining review inconsistency for fake review detection
Shan, G., Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113513 · Cited by 117
A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation
Tay, L. Q., Hurlstone, M. J., Kurz, T., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12551 · Cited by 114
Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for DanishPreprint
Sigurbergsson, G. I., & Derczynski, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.04531 · Cited by 109
AI Technologies for Social Emotional Learning: Recent Research and Future Directions
Sethi, S. S., & Jain, K. (2024) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-03-2024-0073 · Cited by 111
Robust Visual-Textual Sentiment Analysis
You, Q., Cao, L., Jin, H., & Luo, J. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2964284.2964288 · Cited by 109
Mining non-functional requirements from App store reviews
Jha, N. N., & Mahmoud, A. (2019) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09716-7 · Cited by 106
Mirzaalian, F., & Halpenny, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100598 · Cited by 106
Sentiment analysis techniques in recent works
Madhoushi, Z., Hamdan, A. R., & Zainudin, S. (2015) · Science and Information Conference · doi:10.1109/sai.2015.7237157 · Cited by 107
Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images
Won, D., STEINERT-THRELKELD, Z., & Joo, J. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123282 · Cited by 111
Credibility-Based Fake News Detection
Sitaula, N., Mohan, C. K., Grygiel, J., Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2020) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_9 · Cited by 105
Augmented Textual Features-Based Stock Market Prediction
Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., & Awad, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976725 · Cited by 113
Maqbool, J., Aggarwal, P., Kaur, R., Mittal, A. K., & Ganaie, I. A. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.086 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 216-225
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2099813784
- Semantic Scholar
- bcdc102c04fb0e7d4652e8bcc7edd2983bb9576d
- Cited by
- 6,087
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 676 · 2025: 846 · 2024: 877 · 2023: 885 · 2022: 731 · 2021: 714 · 2020: 526 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 245 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 50.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, VADER, rule-based sentiment analysis, social media text, tweets, lexical features, sentiment intensity, microblogging, human raters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
