The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text
Open accessAbstract
The inherent nature of social media content poses serious challenges to practical applications of sentiment analysis. We present VADER, a simple rule-based model for general sentiment analysis, and compare its effectiveness to eleven typical state-of-practice benchmarks including LIWC, ANEW, the General Inquirer, SentiWordNet, and machine learning oriented techniques relying on Naive Bayes, Maximum Entropy, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, we first construct and empirically validate a gold-standard list of lexical features (along with their associated sentiment intensity measures) which are specifically attuned to sentiment in microblog-like contexts. We then combine these lexical features with consideration for five general rules that embody grammatical and syntactical conventions for expressing and emphasizing sentiment intensity. Interestingly, using our parsimonious rule-based model to assess the sentiment of tweets, we find that VADER outperforms individual human raters (F1 Classification Accuracy = 0.96 and 0.84, respectively), and generalizes more favorably across contexts than any of our benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, the VADER (Hutto and Gilbert, 2014) delivered the best results in the multi-class classification case.”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Additional consistency checks were performed using the established VADER lexicon (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014), providing further assurance against algorithmic biases and misclassifications.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Comment-level sentiment is measured using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) [14], a rule-based sentiment analysis tool validated for social media text.”
From OpenClaw AI Agents as Informal Learners at Moltbook: Characterizing an Emergent Learning Community at Scale (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“VADER is chosen for its rule-based, deterministic character: the same text always produces the same score.”
From DMF: A Deterministic Memory Framework for Conversational AI Agents (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Emotional valences, measured with tools such as the LIWC, VADER 51 LabMT, or NRC emotion lexicon were often associated with PTSD symptoms or severity.”
From Linguistic markers for identifying post-traumatic stress disorder and associated symptoms: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning (VADER) is a method that has provided promising results on Twitter data (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The VADER sentiment lexicon is composed of more than 7,000 items, along with their associated sentiment intensity measures, validated by humans and specifically adapted to sentiment in microblog-like contexts, such as Twitter (Hutto & Gilbert, 2014).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Hutto & Gilbert, 2014
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We also conducted robustness checks with other sentiment classification tools95–98, which show broad agreement with the RoBERTa results (Supplementary Sections 5 and 6).”
From Generative language models exhibit social identity biases (2024) · cites this paper as [95]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Responses skew positive, with most students expressing net-positive sentiment about AI's effect on learning and a minority expressing negative sentiment.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Panel B shows that students who express more positive views about AI's effect on learning use AI somewhat more for academic work during the semester ( ˆ β = 0 . 107, p = 0 . 096).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A regression of AI use on the sentiment score yields a positive but statistically insignificant coefficient ( ˆ β = 0 . 041, p = 0 . 647).”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Sentiment is weakly related to both measures.”
From Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutto and Gilbert, 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073 · Cited by 7,793
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016 · Cited by 3,995
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,307
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,647
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [3]3. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0. In Proc. of LREC-10.
- [5]5. Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2012). SenticNet 2. In Proc. AAAI IFAI RSC-12.
- [6]6. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2010). SenticNet. In Proc. of AAAI SCK-10.
- [18]18. Kamps, J., Mokken, R. J., Marx, M., & de Rijke, M. (2004). Us- ing WordNet to measure semantic orientation. In Proc. LREC-04.
- [31]31. Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and Fast -But is it Good?. In Proc. EMNLP-08.
- [33]33. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- [34]34. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Re- search. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- [36]36. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter:. In Proc. ICWSM-10.
- [38]38. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system…real-time Twitter sentiment analysis. ACL-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955 · Cited by 2,610
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2020.0062 · Cited by 1,362
A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6 · Cited by 869
Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919873106 · Cited by 742
Transformer models for text-based emotion detection: a review of BERT-based approaches
Acheampong, F. A., Nunoo‐Mensah, H., & Chen, W. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09958-2 · Cited by 720
Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data
Alaei, A. R., Becken, S., & Stantic, B. (2019) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517747753 · Cited by 622
A survey of multimodal sentiment analysis
Soleymani, M., García, D., Jou, B., Schuller, B. W., Chang, S., & Pantić, M. (2017) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2017.08.003 · Cited by 647
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Edge Weight Prediction in Weighted Signed Networks
Kumar, S., Spezzano, F., Subrahmanian, V. S., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0033 · Cited by 542
Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142390 · Cited by 528
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.12950 · Cited by 531
“The VADER produces sentiment scores between -1 and 1, where a positive (negative) score indicates a positive (negative) sentiment towards the population mentioned in the prompt.”
MethodCheng, J., Bernstein, M. S., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998213 · Cited by 499
Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review
Zhang, T., Schoene, A. M., Ji, S., & Ananiadou, S. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00589-7 · Cited by 476
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods
Ribeiro, F. N., Araújo, M., Gonçalves, P., André Gonçalves, M., & Benevenuto, F. (2016) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1 · Cited by 468
Shapiro, A. H., Sudhof, M., & Wilson, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.053 · Cited by 477
SenticNet 6: Ensemble Application of Symbolic and Subsymbolic AI for Sentiment Analysis
Cambria, E., Li, Y., Xing, F., Poria, S., & Kwok, K. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412003 · Cited by 462
Social media big data analytics: A survey
Ghani, N. B. A., Hamid, S. B., Hashem, M., & Ahmed, E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.039 · Cited by 468
The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation
Sheng, E., Chang, K.-W., Natarajan, P., & Peng, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1339 · Cited by 537
“Moreover, we calculate Spearman’s correlation between 1) sentiment annotations and regard an-6 notations, 2) VADER predictions and sentiment annotations, and 3) VADER predictions and regard annotations in Table 5.”
MethodInfluentialSerial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success
Butticè, V., Colombo, M. G., & Wright, M. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12271 · Cited by 442
Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey
Fang, F., Ventre, C., Basios, M., Kanthan, L., Martínez‐Rego, D., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2022) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00321-6 · Cited by 422
The predictive power of public Twitter sentiment for forecasting cryptocurrency prices
Kraaijeveld, O., & Smedt, J. D. (2020) · Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101188 · Cited by 415
Comparing automated text classification methods
Hartmann, J., Huppertz, J., Schamp, C., & Heitmann, M. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.009 · Cited by 399
More than a Feeling: Accuracy and Application of Sentiment Analysis
Hartmann, J., Heitmann, M., Siebert, C., & Schamp, C. (2023) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.05.005 · Cited by 356
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Zampieri, M., Nakov, P., Rosenthal, S., Atanasova, P., Karadzhov, G., Mubarak, H., Derczynski, L., Pitenis, Z., & Çöltekin, Ç. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.188 · Cited by 400
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159729 · Cited by 381
Incorporating stock prices and news sentiments for stock market prediction: A case of Hong Kong
Li, X., Wu, P., & Wang, W. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102212 · Cited by 402
Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text
Fast, E., Chen, B., & Bernstein, M. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858535 · Cited by 413
A Comprehensive Study on Lexicon Based Approaches for Sentiment Analysis
Bonta, V., Kumaresh, N., & Janardhan, N. (2019) · Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.51983/ajcst-2019.8.s2.2037 · Cited by 275
Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208839120 · Cited by 342
Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web
Kumar, S., Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186141 · Cited by 375
Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Current Challenges and New Directions in Sentiment Analysis Research
Poria, S., Hazarika, D., Majumder, N., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3038167 · Cited by 362
Althoff, T., Clark, K., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00111 · Cited by 322
Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009 · Cited by 348
The impact of sentiment and attention measures on stock market volatility
Audrino, F., Sigrist, F., & Ballinari, D. (2019) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.010 · Cited by 314
Unsupervised Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Generative Approach
Yang, S., Shu, K., Wang, S., Gu, R., Wu, F., & Liu, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015644 · Cited by 313
Rustam, F., Khalid, M., Aslam, W., Rupapara, V., Mehmood, A., & Choi, G. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245909 · Cited by 336
Automatic cyberbullying detection: A systematic review
Rosa, H., Pereira, N., Ribeiro, R., Ferreira, P. C., Carvalho, J. P., Oliveira, S., Coheur, L., Paulino, P., Veiga Simão, A. M., & Trancoso, I. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.021 · Cited by 307
Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus
Dodge, J., Sap, M., Marasović, A., Agnew, W., Ilharco, G., Groeneveld, D., Mitchell, M., & Gardner, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 306
Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classification
González-Carvajal, S., & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.13012 · Cited by 466
Image–text sentiment analysis via deep multimodal attentive fusion
Huang, F., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Xu, J. J., & Li, Z. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.01.019 · Cited by 310
Transformer based Deep Intelligent Contextual Embedding for Twitter sentiment analysis
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Musiał, K., & Imran, M. A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.06.050 · Cited by 311
Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets
Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A. P., & Li, Z. (2019) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8 · Cited by 316
Trotzek, M., Koitka, S., & Friedrich, C. M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2885515 · Cited by 312
SemEval-2018 Task 3: Irony Detection in English Tweets
Hee, C. V., Lefever, E., & Hoste, V. (2018) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1005 · Cited by 312
Predicting Fluctuations in Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on User Comments and Replies
Kim, Y., Kim, J. G., Kim, W., Im, J., Kim, T. H., Kang, S.-J., & Kim, C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161197 · Cited by 303
Hussain, A., Tahir, A., Hussain, Z., Sheikh, Z., Gogate, M., Dashtipour, K. K., Ali, A., & Sheikh, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26627 · Cited by 299
Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive LanguagePreprint
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M. W., & Weber, I. G. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04009 · Cited by 284
A survey of state-of-the-art approaches for emotion recognition in text
Alswaidan, N., & Menaï, M. E. B. (2020) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01449-0 · Cited by 292
Price Movement Prediction of Cryptocurrencies Using Sentiment Analysis and Machine Learning
Valencia, F., Gómez-Espinosa, A., & Valdés-Aguirre, B. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21060589 · Cited by 295
Valdez, D., ten Thij, M., Bathina, K. C., Rutter, L. A., & Bollen, J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21418 · Cited by 275
The future of service: The power of emotion in human-robot interaction
Chuah, S. H., & Yu, J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102551 · Cited by 279
A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks
Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114006 · Cited by 290
Using VADER sentiment and SVM for predicting customer response sentiment
Borg, A., & Boldt, M. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113746 · Cited by 251
Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships
Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D. J., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K. E. C., Naaman, M., Hancock, J. T., & Jung, M. F. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9 · Cited by 380
A novel LSTM–CNN–grid search-based deep neural network for sentiment analysis
Priyadarshini, I., & Cotton, C. (2021) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-021-03838-w · Cited by 253
Akhtar, M. S., Ekbal, A., & Cambria, E. (2020) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2019.2954667 · Cited by 246
A novel ensemble deep learning model for stock prediction based on stock prices and news
Li, Y., & Pan, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00279-9 · Cited by 247
Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection
Alonso, M. Á., Vilares, D., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, J. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111348 · Cited by 267
Mao, R., Liu, Q., He, K., Li, W., & Cambria, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2022.3204972 · Cited by 263
Topics, trends, and sentiments of tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic: Temporal infoveillance study
Chandrasekaran, R., Mehta, V., Valkunde, T., & Moustakas, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22624 · Cited by 214
ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations
Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6 · Cited by 242
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z · Cited by 251
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter
Yousefinaghani, S., Dara, R. A., Mubareka, S., Papadopoulos, A., & Sharif, S. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059 · Cited by 236
Moore, F. C., Obradovich, N., Lehner, F., & Baylis, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1816541116 · Cited by 237
Timed intervention in COVID-19 and panic buying
Prentice, C., Chen, J., & Stantic, B. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102203 · Cited by 230
Mining Twitter Data for Improved Understanding of Disaster Resilience
Zou, L., Lam, N., Cai, H., & Qiang, Y. (2018) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897 · Cited by 243
Alharbi, A. S. M., & de Doncker, E. (2018) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.001 · Cited by 228
Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using Tweet Volumes and Sentiment Analysis
Abraham, J., Higdon, D., Nelson, J. B., & Ibarra, J. G. (2018) · SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · Cited by 223
Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Good
Wang, X., Shi, W., Kim, R., Oh, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, J., & Yu, Z. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1566 · Cited by 222
Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.26 · Cited by 233
A Survey of Text Representation and Embedding Techniques in NLP
Patil, R., Boit, S., Gudivada, V. N., & Nandigam, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3266377 · Cited by 276
Sentiment Analysis in Health and Well-Being: Systematic Review
Žunić, A., Corcoran, P., & Spasić, . (2019) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/16023 · Cited by 239
Comparison of text preprocessing methods
Chai, C. P. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000213 · Cited by 303
Hierarchical Propagation Networks for Fake News Detection: Investigation and Exploitation
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7329 · Cited by 229
Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter
Pereira-Kohatsu, J. C., Quijano-Sánchez, L., Liberatore, F., & Camacho‐Collados, M. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19214654 · Cited by 233
Kumar, A., Srinivasan, K., Cheng, W.-H., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102141 · Cited by 219
Sentiment analysis and opinion mining on educational data: A survey
Shaik, T., Tao, X., Dann, C., Xie, H., Li, Y., & Galligan, L. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2022.100003 · Cited by 215
Stochastic Neural Networks for Cryptocurrency Price Prediction
Patel, J., Kalariya, V., Parmar, P., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990659 · Cited by 217
Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions
Yin, W., & Zubiaga, A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.598 · Cited by 238
Son, L. H., Kumar, A., Sangwan, S. R., Arora, A., Nayyar, A., & Abdel-Basset, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899260 · Cited by 206
Hopp, F. R., Fisher, J. T., Cornell, D., Huskey, R., & Weber, R. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01433-0 · Cited by 236
Exposures and behavioural responses to wildfire smoke
Burke, M., Heft‐Neal, S., Li, J., Driscoll, A., Baylis, P., Stigler, M., Weill, J., Burney, J. A., Wen, J., Childs, M. L., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01396-6 · Cited by 218
Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.01286 · Cited by 334
Movie Recommendation System Using Sentiment Analysis From Microblogging Data
Kumar, S., De, K., & Roy, P. P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2993585 · Cited by 204
You, Q., Luo, J., Jin, H., & Yang, J. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/2835776.2835779 · Cited by 199
A Survey of Sentiment Analysis from Social Media Data
Chakraborty, K., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bag, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2956957 · Cited by 207
Refining Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis
Yu, L.-C., Wang, J., Lai, K.-H. R., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1056 · Cited by 195
Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation
Eslami, S. P., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.06.012 · Cited by 201
Qi, Y., & Shabrina, Z. (2023) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-023-01030-x · Cited by 253
Fuzzy rule based unsupervised sentiment analysis from social media posts
Vashishtha, S., & Susan, S. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112834 · Cited by 196
A Complete VADER-Based Sentiment Analysis of Bitcoin (BTC) Tweets during the Era of COVID-19
Pano, T., & Kashef, R. F. (2020) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc4040033 · Cited by 189
Predicting mild cognitive impairment from spontaneous spoken utterances
Asgari, M., Kaye, J., & Dodge, H. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.01.006 · Cited by 185
Pataranutaporn, P., Liu, R., Finn, E., & Maes, P. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00720-7 · Cited by 192
Sentiment analysis for software engineering
Lin, B., Zampetti, F., Bavota, G., Penta, M. D., Lanza, M., & Oliveto, R. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3180155.3180195 · Cited by 187
Stock Price Forecasting with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Shahi, T. B., Shrestha, A., Neupane, A., & Guo, W. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8091441 · Cited by 183
Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes
Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2 · Cited by 183
Aljedaani, W., Rustam, F., Mkaouer, M. W., Ghallab, A., Rupapara, V., Washington, P. B., Lee, E., & Ashraf, I. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109780 · Cited by 176
Financial Sentiment Analysis: Techniques and Applications
Du, K., Xing, F., Mao, R., & Cambria, E. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649451 · Cited by 215
Refining Word Embeddings Using Intensity Scores for Sentiment Analysis
Yu, L.-C., Wang, J., Lai, K.-H. R., & Zhang, X. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2788182 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 216-225
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2099813784
- Semantic Scholar
- bcdc102c04fb0e7d4652e8bcc7edd2983bb9576d
- Cited by
- 6,087
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 676 · 2025: 846 · 2024: 877 · 2023: 885 · 2022: 731 · 2021: 714 · 2020: 526 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 245 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 50.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- sentiment analysis, VADER, rule-based sentiment analysis, social media text, tweets, lexical features, sentiment intensity, microblogging, human raters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
