The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology
Abstract
New and improved glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops continue to be rapidly developed. These crops confer greater crop safety to multiple glyphosate applications, higher rates, and wider application timings. Many of these crops will also have glyphosate resistance stacked with traits that confer resistance to herbicides with other modes of actions to expand the utility of existing herbicides and to increase the number of mixture options that can delay the evolution of GR weeds. Some breeding stacks of herbicide resistance traits are currently available, but the trend in the future will be to combine resistance genes in molecular stacks. The first example of such a molecular stack has a new metabolically based mechanism to inactivate glyphosate combined with an active site-based resistance for herbicides that inhibit acetolactate synthase (ALS). This stack confers resistance to glyphosate and all five classes of ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Other molecular stacks will include glyphosate resistance with resistance to auxin herbicides and herbicides that inhibit acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) and 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD). Scientists are also studying a number of other herbicide resistance transgenes. Some of these new transgenes will be used to make new multiple herbicide-resistant crops that offer growers more herbicide options to meet their changing weed management needs and to help sustain the efficacy of glyphosate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years?
Duke, S. O. (2012) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.2333 · Cited by 559
Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management
Green, J. M., & Owen, M. D. K. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101286h · Cited by 301
Self-citationMeftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Glyphosate: too much of a good thing?
Cuhra, M., Bøhn, T., & Cuhra, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00028 · Cited by 106
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2480 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, J. M.
- Venue
- Weed Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-117
- ISSN
- 0043-1745 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2759
- OpenAlex
- W1975339792
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1614/ws-08-030.1
- The paper
- Green, J. M. (2009). Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology. Weed Science. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-08-030.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.